Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
I'm calling bullshit on WTFuckingliar. He is back-pedaling to cover his gay ass. This is more than just "speculation":
If anyone needs to be reprimanded here, it's fagboy!
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Not only did you backpedal - now you're flip-flopping again! If you KNOW something is true, there is no room for speculating about whether or not it MIGHT be true.
I know for a fact it is true, that is why I speculated about it on the open board!
You told COG you knew he received a warning. True You were definitive and didn't speculate about it. True Then after JCM posted, you backpedaled and said you were just speculating. I said that speculation sure struck a nerve. I called bullshit, so now you're back to saying you know again. Oh , I know. Now if you want to speculate how I know, go ahead.
If COG didn't get a warning, then you are a liar to say you know he did. He did get a warning , so I'm no liar. If he received a warning and admitted it to you privately, He admitted nothing to me privately but he has in fact admitted to all in his posting that he received a warning then you are a POS and an immature jackass to proclaim it publicly you are calling me immature while calling me names and rub his nose in it. If you two will quit shitting in the forum, I'll quit rubbing your noses in it Either way, you deserve to be reprimanded.
.
Oh we are back to you thinking I need to be reprimanded, in this forum for what? Rubbing COG nose in a turd he shit?
That's a "concept" that is foreign to WTF ... facts vs opinions.
BTW: He doesn't change the handle, he just erroneously restates the post.
And since he thinks he is brilliant, it must be intentional.
I speculated that I knew it to be a fact!
You can not change the handle, you can change the post if noted. Those are the facts, just ask COGay! He got a warning for not following those facts and has been crying about me knowing that fact ever since! Shit lustyladyboy been crying too, almost forgot that queenie.
If a member receives an official ECCIE warning or infraction ...that info is only known by staff and by the member on the receiving end of it (...unless that member decides to disclose the info).
Ok JCM, the ball is in your court....
WTFuckhead is stirring up shit. He is running a victory lap here based on something you told us is supposed to be known only to you and the receiving party. COG didn't disclose anything and you didn't either.
Could you please find out if WTFagboy is hacking into everyone's Private Messages on this board? This is a serious security issue!
He needs to explain himself to a mod and STFU to everyone else.
You might as well have stayed logged in as IB for this one. Sounds just like that turd. You, once again like IB, fail to recognize the third option; he was bluffing. I bet you're a terrible card player. You bluff to see a person's reaction. He may or may not know about receiving a warning, but he certainly raised your hackles. And the fact that you are going on about it, you're tipping your hand even more.
"...tipping your hand..." Well that's something you know a LOT about and you're REAL good at woomby ! You "tip your hand" all day down at Talleywackers when jerking guys off at the gloryholes !
WTFuckhead is stirring up shit. He is running a victory lap here based on something you told us is supposed to be known only to you and the receiving party. COG didn't disclose anything and you didn't either.
COGay, just tell lustyladyboy how I know...
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
He needs to explain himself to a mod and STFU to everyone else..
And if I don't STFU or explain myself to a Mod, wtf you gonna do?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Could you please find out if WTFagboy is hacking into everyone's Private Messages on this board? This is a serious security issue!
It's funny how unglued WPF has become. Ranting about a possible warning I allegedly received. I have never been banned, have you, WPF? I have never received any points. Have you, WPF? Then why are you so excited about the possibility of me receiving a warning?
If I had received a warning, it would have been worth it. Just to watch your meltdown. You are truly an unstable, psychotic, cunty bitch. With an agenda.
You are at least three moves behind old man, lustylady hasn't even left the starting block on this subject. Get that girl a tampon...she is a cramping up!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
It's funny how unglued WTF has become.Unglued.........I was hoping we could change posters names but then you got a warning saying you can't do it.
Ranting about a possible warning I allegedly received. possible warning? allegedly received? You received a warning , period. I have never been banned, have you, WPF? WPF has never been banned. I have never received any points. Have you, WPF? WPF has never received any points Then why are you so excited about the possibility of me receiving a warning? lustladyboy is the one excited. He is so excited to find out how .....his voice has risen to the level of soprano in a all girl choir
If I had received a warning If, there is no if, it would have been worth it. Good and the proper tense is was, because you have received it. Just to watch your meltdown. Laughdown You are truly an unstable, psychotic, cunty bitch. With an agenda. I already told you my agenda was to see if we could change the names when quoting, the warning you received tells me all I need to know.
So who told you I received a warning, WTF?
I'm sorry COGay, I am not at liberty to disclose that information.
And if I don't STFU or explain myself to a Mod, wtf you gonna do?
Probably go back to talking about how similar you are to Dr. Josef Mengele. I mean, that's why you started this incredibly petty diversion in the first place, right? Every time you looked in the mirror you saw the evil doctor.... shit, that would give me the creepers too!
Planned Parenthood, engulfed in a scandal following the release of two undercover videos, is the largest abortion provider in the United States.
On its website, the organization compliments Margaret Sanger as one of the pro-choice movement’s “great heroes.” Sanger started the American Birth Control League in 1921; it became part of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.
Planned Parenthood praises Sanger for “providing contraception and other health services” and “advancing access to family planning in the United States and around the world.”
In addition to Planned Parenthood, Sanger also founded the Birth Control Review, a journal about contraception and population control.
Here are 13 things Sanger said during her lifetime.
1) She proposed allowing Congress to solve “population problems” by appointing a “Parliament of Population.”
“Directors representing the various branches of science [in the Parliament would] … direct and control the population through birth rates and immigration, and direct its distribution over the country according to national needs consistent with taste, fitness and interest of the individuals.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
2) Sanger called the various methods of population control, including abortion, “defending the unborn against their own disabilities.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
3) Sanger believed that the United States should “keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, Insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
4) Sanger advocated “a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
5) People whom Sanger considered unfit, she wrote, should be sent to “farm lands and homesteads” where “they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
6) She was an advocate of a proposal called the “American Baby Code.”
“The results desired are obviously selective births,” she wrote.
According to Sanger, the code would “protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.” —“America Needs a Code for Babies,” March 27, 1934, Margaret Sanger Papers, Library of Congress, 128:0312B
7) While advocating for the American Baby Code, she argued that marriage licenses should provide couples with the right to only “a common household” but not parenthood. In fact, couples should have to obtain a permit to become parents:
Article 3. A marriage license shall in itself give husband and wife only the right to a common household and not the right to parenthood.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.
Article 5. Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
“All that sounds highly revolutionary, and it might be impossible to put the scheme into practice,” Sanger wrote.
She added: “What is social planning without a quota?” —“America Needs a Code for Babies,” March 27, 1934, Margaret Sanger Papers, Library of Congress, 128:0312B
8) She believed that large families were detrimental to society.
“The most serious evil of our times is that of encouraging the bringing into the world of large families. The most immoral practice of the day is breeding too many children,” she wrote.
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” she continued. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 5: The Wickedness of Creating Large Families
9) She argued that motherhood must be “efficient.”
“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 18: The Goal
10) Population control, she wrote, would bring about the “materials of a new race.”
“If we are to develop in America a new race with a racial soul, we must keep the birth rate within the scope of our ability to understand as well as to educate. We must not encourage reproduction beyond our capacity to assimilate our numbers so as to make the coming generation into such physically fit, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are the ideal of a democracy,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 3: The Materials of the New Race
11) Sanger wrote that an excess in population must be reduced.
“War, famine, poverty and oppression of the workers will continue while woman makes life cheap,” she wrote.
Mothers, “at whatever cost, she must emerge from her ignorance and assume her responsibility.” —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 1: Woman’s Error and Her Debt
12) “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” Sanger wrote. —Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble on Dec., 10, 1939
13) In an interview with Mike Wallace in 1957, Sanger said, “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world, that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically.”
“Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin—that people can—can commit,” she said.
Ah, but your misnomer, WTF, has been banned. Hasn't he? And received points, hasn't he? And he is a cunty bitch with an agenda, in a huge meltdown mode. Aren't you?
And you can tell me who told you. I'll keep it a secret.
Me? No ban. No points. Ever. Go fuck yourself, psycho bitch.
Probably go back to talking about how similar you are to Dr. Josef Mengele. I mean, that's why you started this incredibly petty diversion in the first place, right? Every time you looked in the mirror you saw the evil doctor.... shit, that would give me the creepers too!
Did you shave off your mustache, fagboy?
.
I'm glad to see you have quit crying about how unfair it is that I know for a fact that COGay got a warning.
Either way, you deserve to be reprimanded.
Reprimanded forwhat?... making you and COG cry?
.....I was hoping we could change posters names but then you got a warning saying you can't do it.
