SAN ANTONIO'S SAY IT WITH A U-TUBE VIDEO THREAD!!:)

[a10bomb]

Originally Posted by Louigi

Right! And SL had sent me instructions a few days ago! I do have an excuse for being so absent minded - I turned 65 today and I've killed a lot of brain cells with fine brewskis!

Happy Birthday!! Louigi!!
Here's to killing a few more brain cells that is!!

[Guest101114]

Maybe you should be saying "I turned 65 today and I've killed fine brain cells with a lot of brewskis!" instead of "I turned 65 today and I've killed a lot of brain cells with fine brewskis!"

Jk jk hehe Happy birthday!!

[Netx9]

Originally Posted by Louigi

Right! And SL had sent me instructions a few days ago! I do have an excuse for being so absent minded - I turned 65 today and I've killed a lot of brain cells with fine brewskis!

[Guest032716]

[a10bomb]

Originally Posted by Whispers

You are proving to simply be a close minded lemming.

A Lemming I thought I was a WK!!!

But what a surprise Whispers is again accusing someone of something that is not true hmmmm sounds familiar. That's ok it seems the lemmings are a misunderstood creature as well:




From wikipedia:

Lemming behavior and appearance are markedly different from many other rodents, which are inconspicuously colored and try to conceal themselves from their predators. Lemmings, on the contrary, are conspicuously colored, and behave aggressively towards predators and even human observers. The lemming defense system is thought to be based on aposematism (warning display).

So lemming or WK at least I am still cute

[Precious_b]

I LOVE IT, A10!

Gotta watch the teeth on them Lemmings

Kinda reminds me of those old posters from the 70s. (Just insert lemming))

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Whispers

....

You are proving to simply be a close minded lemming.

While you consistently, in the past (and with postings I've made you've responded to) and i'm sure currently are doing, have sidestepped/ignored valid points that counter what you've said.

I'm not saying that is closed minded. But the frequency you've done it makes me think it was intentional, not accidental like I've passed it off as on your part.

To be honest, I haven't been looking to see if you are currently doing this since my interest really haven't been piqued by what you've posted of late.

Need to step up that game, sir

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

While you consistently, in the past (and with postings I've made you've responded to) and i'm sure currently are doing, have sidestepped/ignored valid points that counter what you've said.

I'm not saying that is closed minded. But the frequency you've done it makes me think it was intentional, not accidental like I've passed it off as on your part.

To be honest, I haven't been looking to see if you are currently doing this since my interest really haven't been piqued by what you've posted of late.

Need to step up that game, sir

I've been waiting onn someone to suggest the gameplan was not working. Thank-you precious.

If it IS a game than there has to be a winner one would think.

So what is the "game" here.

Well.... Some would same it was intended to get SG to step up, admit she was wrong and issue an apology to those she wronged initially.

Instead she tried to ignore and then attack. Some tend to think "time" heals".... Nope. This problem can wait for her for a week, a month or a year.....

In the meantime regarding the "game" Precious......

I think the game is fine.

Summary: SG has gone from a daily presence , multiple new threADs a month, and pretty much daily participation to withdrawing from the board as a result of the situation she created.

22 New ThreADs in last 3 months but only 4 in the last month
86 Posts in last 3 months but only 8 in the last month

From 9 new ThreAds a month to only 4? A decrease of 55%
From 43 a month to only 8? A decrease of 81%

Most importantly she went from a lady of good character that carried herself well on the boards rising above all the bullshit to a bitter old woman that could not get her way and blamed it on everyone else.

I would say the game is progressing fine.

Most do not seem capable of acknowledging that they are simply like the fans on the sidelines.... cheering on your favorites but having no real outcome on the game itself with the exception of a few that help points get made also


I did not look to take this approach with SG. She involved me in it and when she did not like my suggestion she chose to disparage andlater attack me seeking me out to let me know she had created more mischief.

I never ignore those that want my attention.

[Guest032716]

Back on topic

[Netx9]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Summary: SG has gone from a daily presence , multiple new threADs a month, and pretty much daily participation to withdrawing from the board as a result of the situation she created.

22 New ThreADs in last 3 months but only 4 in the last month
86 Posts in last 3 months but only 8 in the last month

From 9 new ThreAds a month to only 4? A decrease of 55%
From 43 a month to only 8? A decrease of 81%
this approach with SG.

Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy... Mighty big ego to assume you had anything to do with it... My guess, she's too busy answering emails, pms and requests and her business hasn't suffered one bit. Equating someone's board presence with their relevance and business success again fits your narrative and proves your point that you've affected her in some way... While also admitting that you like to browbeat and discourage someone from posting... Mighty ironic from someone who accuses others of asking questions that discourage board participation.

Excellent statistical analysis but, to stay on topic, I'd offer this....

[a10bomb]

Originally Posted by Netx9

Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy... Mighty big ego to assume you had anything to do with it... My guess, she's too busy answering emails, pms and requests and her business hasn't suffered one bit. Equating someone's board presence with their relevance and business success again fits your narrative and proves your point that you've affected her in some way... While also admitting that you like to browbeat and discourage someone from posting... Mighty ironic from someone who accuses others of asking questions that discourage board participation.

Excellent statistical analysis but, to stay on topic, I'd offer this....

Don't forget Netx9 he wants those that don't speak up to participate as long as you agree with him otherwise you are a WK or is it a lemming I can't remember

I guess Whispers really has:

[Guest032716]

Why my last name is Pacino

[Guest070316-1]

Since everyone is doing it here. Happy Birthday Louigi!! A song for our enjoyment. And yes...I do have...

[a10bomb]

[QUOTE=Louigi;1055100643]Why my last name is Pacino



One of my heroes...
Pacino that is...
Just a couple of my favorite scenes





And my favorite

[Slave Guinevere]

Originally Posted by Netx9

Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy... Mighty big ego to assume you had anything to do with it... My guess, she's too busy answering emails, pms and requests and her business hasn't suffered one bit. Equating someone's board presence with their relevance and business success again fits your narrative and proves your point that you've affected her in some way... While also admitting that you like to browbeat and discourage someone from posting... Mighty ironic from someone who accuses others of asking questions that discourage board participation.

Excellent statistical analysis but, to stay on topic, I'd offer this....

Netx9…

Sometimes you CALL AT THE MOST INOPPORTUNE TIMES…

Don't you LOVE IT when a PLAN all comes TOGETHER?


Your amused slave,

Guinevere


P.S.

I will be there very soon...