Taylorsky out in the open

[awesome0116]

wow

[John Boneher]

Originally Posted by Plastic Man

boneher you got a habit of obsessing lol
ya gots ta realize old jimmies consider average and even below average looking hooks hot pieces of ass compared to what they were forced to marry or what they might have got lucky enough to fuck for free before they started paying for it
lots of the ass that has historically been called amazing on here has only been amazing in how average it is and how much that average costs$$$

Plastic, I'm doing a double take as I'm typing this, but I agree with you!


Yeah I know I'm obsessing. I'm bored. Doing my taxes and figured wtf. We were talking about taylorsky VIOLATIONand her quality level. The only way to assess is by means of comparison. Anyone who thinks rb agency is a better value than taylorsky, I'd be curious to hear why.

I was obsessing over rb, but I realized that was silly. Way better out there. Period

If you'd rather discuss tax law, I'm all ears. No, seriously. I could use some help with saving some $

[John Boneher]

Originally Posted by pmiddlebrook1225

I believe it was you that called me lazy recently for this very approach.

For reasons I elucidated above, I changed my modus operandi. Not as much free time. I can see the justification... If it's good quality. Like Mirina, for example. I changed my perspective a little; hope that doesn't make you feel uncomfortable or something.

I do still feel it's lazy though. Nothing wrong with that. So is sitting on the couch rubbing one out to the Russian figure skaters, no? [the ladies, of course] just a hypothetical remark.

Bp is still the best. Lot of work though.

[sucrunchman]

I think it's funny that people equate proper grammar on a hooker website with business knowledge/job. Usually when people start picking on the grammar, it's cause they're all out of ammo and know they've lost. I'm guessing that's the case here as well.

[JohnnyCap]

Originally Posted by jackfengshui

FWIW, these are two interesting posts by Taylor Sky:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...8&postcount=32

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...3&postcount=38

Nice! I didn't take the extra step of looking at the thread(s) those posts came from, but they paint an interesting picture.

In the first, I detect a lady of quality rightfully fed up with some bullshit, though her 'friend' doesn't appear to represent her upscale side.

In the second, however, we get a fairly bitter rant unworthy of an upscale lady that completely justifies the financial analysis in the mens' lounge earlier today. Nothing justifies financial analysis that bad, but the door was certainly opened by the lady herself.

[sucrunchman]

I can't even imagine you could possibly have the time or energy to look up actual links. I get on here to raz all you morons. I guess I really do a good job if Im the reason you're going through so much trouble. Look up some more links for me son! Lmao

[Guest042416]

jack, she fucks good right??

[jackfengshui]

Originally Posted by bjwstw

jack, she fucks good right??

There are others in this thread who are more qualified to answer that.

[Guest042416]

lol I know just wanted to see if you climbed on her yet

[Plastic Man]

Originally Posted by sucrunchman

I can't even imagine you could possibly have the time or energy to look up actual links. I get on here to raz all you morons. I guess I really do a good job if Im the reason you're going through so much trouble. Look up some more links for me son! Lmao

lol
the hook reviews are all cross referenced and shit like the library of congress.
every bj catalogued and indexed for future research

[Taskmaster]

Originally Posted by jackfengshui

FWIW, these are two interesting posts by Taylor Sky:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...8&postcount=32

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...3&postcount=38

Exudes class.

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by John Boneher

We were talking about taylorsky iVIOLATIONand her quality level.

You were doing what?

[BBBJCIMNQNS]

What wakeup said, isn't talking about ML in the open a BANNABLE offense MODS?

[Wakeup]

We don't need banned members commenting on anything here...thanks though...

[BBBJCIMNQNS]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

We don't need banned members commenting on anything here...thanks though...

Are you referring to...........