Blatant discrimination and outright cruelty to a POST-op TS provider, in Austin TX of all places?

[Still Looking]

[Still Looking]

Don't even thinck about it RB. Trust me.....

[JohnnyYanks]

Whale Wars redux?

[Hot to Trot Daphne]

I didn't read half the posts in this thread, so forgive me if I misstep. I'm sorry this has been a hurtful situation for you. However I do have a couple of comments...

If you are a TS, pre or post op, you were born a man, and I think that information (TS designation) should be readily available and visible in your sig line, showcase, or other highly visible place. Whether you or the law stamps that you are a woman, fact is you weren't born one, and I think anyone choosing to engage should be able to make the choice whether they're cool with that or not. I see some TS try to trick guys into thinking that they are a natural girl for whatever reason. Not cool and has gotten some people really hurt.

Other than that, you should be able to enjoy the same posting rights as every other provider here. Some of the guys here are interminably rude to the natural females here, so you're not going to be immune to that, but I ridiculing you because of your lifestyle is NOT cool.

just my .02

[Guest062114-5]

Texas laws regarding transgendered individuals are various and inconsistent, because it's an evolving matter. Issues regarding same sex marriage have further complicated the issue. In general, sex is usually determined by birth with a birth certificate. Gender can be changed legally on a driver's license and this is what generally determines how a person is treated legally. A post-op person should use the bathroom of their new gender, will be considered the new gender if incarcerated, etc.

While the area is an extremely gray area of the law and changing daily, I don't think it's fair to say that Texas is completely close minded in this area.

These are my thoughts off the top of my head, I didn't include citations because I didn't look any up. Because if I did...I'd have to charge Still Looking my hourly rate and I couldn't bear cutting into his hobby budget...actually, i think budget is a dirty word.

[Guest062114-5]

Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

I didn't read half the posts in this thread, so forgive me if I misstep. I'm sorry this has been a hurtful situation for you. However I do have a couple of comments...

If you are a TS, pre or post op, you were born a man, and I think that information (TS designation) should be readily available and visible in your sig line, showcase, or other highly visible place. Whether you or the law stamps that you are a woman, fact is you weren't born one, and I think anyone choosing to engage should be able to make the choice whether they're cool with that or not. I see some TS try to trick guys into thinking that they are a natural girl for whatever reason. Not cool and has gotten some people really hurt.

Other than that, you should be able to enjoy the same posting rights as every other provider here. Some of the guys here are interminably rude to the natural females here, so you're not going to be immune to that, but I ridiculing you because of your lifestyle is NOT cool.

just my .02

Just an FYI, it's stated in CAPs in her showcase. Has been from the start.

Me love you long time Daphne.

[Ansley]

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Texas laws regarding transgendered individuals are various and inconsistent,

I'm thinking at this point, the guys could care less about the law. A law won't change their perspective one iota.

[Guest062114-5]

Originally Posted by Ansley

I'm thinking at this point, the guys could care less about the law. A law won't change their perspective one iota.

It's only in response to the posts stating Texas doesn't recognize sex changes. It's in no way in relation to trying to convince anyone to change their personal views. That would be silly.

Actually, my personal opinion is that guys who see any type of TS are gay. But that doesn't change the law.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Just an FYI, it's stated in CAPs in her showcase. Has been from the start.

You are incorrect on that. He added that after initial pressure started to be applied by many citing his BackPage Ads. It's how the animosity began. His famous battle cry "What people don't know won't hurt them" began at that time as wel.


Regarding Texas State Law most recent case seems to have been decided in mid September 16th regarding a "Wife's" claim on insurance or estate and the state stayed with a consistency to ruling that no matter how paperwork or IDs are changed the true record of birth showing he was born a man invalidated the marriage and the monies went to his family.

TEXAS law seems pretty consistent. Cities and counties have tried enacting their own laws and the Attorney General is diving into that one it seems.

[Guest062114-5]

Originally Posted by Whispers

You are incorrect on that. He added that after initial pressure started to be applied by many citing his BackPage Ads. It's how the animosity began. His famous battle cry "What people don't know won't hurt them" began at that time as wel.


Regarding Texas State Law most recent case seems to have been decided in mid September 16th regarding a "Wife's" claim on insurance or estate and the state stayed with a consistency to ruling that no matter how paperwork or IDs are changed the true record of birth showing he was born a man invalidated the marriage and the monies went to his family.

TEXAS law seems pretty consistent. Cities and counties have tried enacting their own laws and the Attorney General is diving into that one it seems.

Actually, i believe that's because at the time the only acceptable way to determine sex for a marriage license was via birth certificate. Hence, the marriage was void and the transactions that followed also. It's the same in the case of a bigamist.

Perhaps you're talking sex and I'm talking gender.

And I agree that her initial WW post stated nothing about being a PO-TS. But she had already done sessions, has reviews and was verified when she posted her showcase. It said Post Op TS on that day. I know cuz she posted a threAD about it! LMAO

[Ansley]

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

I
Actually, my personal opinion is that guys who see any type of TS are gay.

I've never thought of labeling them gay, that's a pretty strong accusation. I've just thought of them being a lot kinkier and more experimental than me.

[Hot to Trot Daphne]

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Just an FYI, it's stated in CAPs in her showcase. Has been from the start.

Me love you long time Daphne.

As it should be... I you too.

Originally Posted by Ansley

I'm thinking at this point, the guys could care less about the law. A law won't change their perspective one iota.

This is just funny logic on a hooker site. Does the law change your perspective on hoing? other than not getting caught?

Originally Posted by Whispers

You are incorrect on that. He added that after initial pressure started to be applied by many citing his BackPage Ads. It's how the animosity began. His famous battle cry "What people don't know won't hurt them" began at that time as wel.

Now that would bring animosity, I knew it had to be something. There are many TS on this site that participate, post, and get dates as well as reviews here, but you can see in every one of their posts that they are a TS because it's in their sig line. No games, and no sneaky stuff. If a TS is going on the premise that "what people don't know won't hurt them" is just cruising for problems, here and in the real world.

[Ansley]

Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

This is just funny logic on a hooker site. Does the law change your perspective on hoing? other than not getting caught?

If by law she is now a woman, that isn't going to change a man's mind that she was once a man. At some point in this thread I got the impression that since it's the law, that men should be more accepting to the idea of seeing her.

My views on the laws of escorting really have nothing to do with this thread.

[RocKin BraNdy]

I never tried to hide anything, and ive clarified this a couple times already "what they dont know wont hurt them" is being taken out of context. It wasnt meant in the way they are throwing it around now at all. It was a response to them trying to scare business away saying guys who see me are faggots and providers wont see them, it was a statement simply meaning "well i aint gonna tell the other providers whos seen me" so that WONT hurt anyone, i think everyone agrees about being discreet right? That statement was not referring to guys knowing about me whatsoever.

QUOTE=Luxury Daphne;1054688915]As it should be... I you too.



This is just funny logic on a hooker site. Does the law change your perspective on hoing? other than not getting caught?



Now that would bring animosity, I knew it had to be something. There are many TS on this site that participate, post, and get dates as well as reviews here, but you can see in every one of their posts that they are a TS because it's in their sig line. No games, and no sneaky stuff. If a TS is going on the premise that "what people don't know won't hurt them" is just cruising for problems, here and in the real world.[/QUOTE]

[Hot to Trot Daphne]

Originally Posted by Ansley

If by law she is now a woman, that isn't going to change a man's mind that she was once a man. At some point in this thread I got the impression that since it's the law, that men should be more accepting to the idea of seeing her.

My views on the laws of escorting really have nothing to do with this thread.

No offense hon, I always chuckle when people bring up 'the law' in such an unlawful place. The fact is that what 'the law' says around here carries little to no weight, and wouldn't to me either if I had a dick and someone was trying to pass off a genetic male to me when I don't want one... the law has no account when it comes to personal preference, especially sex.

carry on.