Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163644
Yssup Rider61244
gman4453346
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48797
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37398
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2013, 09:01 AM   #1
Stan.Dupp
Valued Poster
 
Stan.Dupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 27, 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 324
Default Judge rules that police officer will remain fired for tazing and elderly nursing home resident to death.

Courthouse News

Firing Proper for Use of Taser on Addled Senior
By JEFF D. GORMAN

(CN) - A police officer who repeatedly Tasered a naked nursing home patient with Alzheimer's disease was properly fired, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled.

Doug Martin, an officer in Peru, Ind., had been summoned to Miller's Merry Manor on June 17, 2012, after a nurse called 911 for help in transporting a patient who had hit his roommate, a nurse and a nursing assistant.

Martin and his partner, Officer Jeremy Brindle, entered the Alzheimer's ward to find 64-year-old James Howard sitting in a chair, wearing socks and nothing else. Howard refused the officers' command to lie on a gurney and advanced toward Brindle, who tried to handcuff Howard.

When Brindle lost control of one of Howard's wrists, Martin yelled "Taser" and deployed it on Howard's torso. Martin zapped Howard five times for a total of 31 seconds.

Howard's wife complained, and Martin was fired after a department investigation and a hearing before the city's Board of Public Works and Safety. The reasons for his termination were excessive force and conduct unbecoming an officer.

Martin took the case to the Miami Superior Court, which overturned Martin's firing, citing more than 100 "reasons that the decision should not be affirmed."

The city of Peru and its police department appealed the ruling, arguing that the trial court had substituted its opinion for that of the board.

In another reversal last week, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that Martin was properly fired, citing the testimony of Jon Jumper who trained Martin on the use of a Taser.

"Jumper testified that Martin had specifically been instructed - in the recertification presentation - on the increased risk of death or serious injury for exposure over 15 seconds, whether due to multiple applications or continuous cycling," Judge Lloyd Bailey wrote for a three-member panel.

"Intervals to achieve compliance were very short, with only a two-second interval between the third and fourth deployments. Moreover, it is noteworthy that Howard was handcuffed after the third Taser application," Bailey added
.
The panel chided the lower court for having "disregarded evidence favorable to (the board's) decision, credited the testimony of witnesses that the trial court did not personally hear, and misstated evidence regarding the scope of Martin's training. In short, the trial court reweighed the evidence and reassessed the credibility of witnesses."

------------------

Apparently there has been an increase in deaths that have resulted from improper use of tazers. Another article on police officers reprimanded for excessive use of tazers: http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/...db48cca4b.html
Stan.Dupp is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:03 AM   #2
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

So the tasering would have been acceptable if stopped after 15 seconds?
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:08 AM   #3
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
So the tasering would have been acceptable if stopped after 15 seconds?
Yes dumbass. Can't you read? Probably does not help the Cops case to taser them after having handcuffed him...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan.Dupp View Post
Courthouse News





"Jumper testified that Martin had specifically been instructed - in the recertification presentation - on the increased risk of death or serious injury for exposure over 15 seconds, whether due to multiple applications or continuous cycling," Judge Lloyd Bailey wrote for a three-member panel.

"Intervals to achieve compliance were very short, with only a two-second interval between the third and fourth deployments. Moreover, it is noteworthy that Howard was handcuffed after the third Taser application," Bailey added
.
.html
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:23 AM   #4
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
So the tasering would have been acceptable if stopped at 15 seconds?
According to his re-qual training as related by the Court (on appeal), apparently...

... there must be an opinion written somewhere, if not soon.

I'm glad some courts got involved in the decision making ....

.......................... the report seems a little fuzzy though ....
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:44 AM   #5
Stan.Dupp
Valued Poster
 
Stan.Dupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 27, 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 324
Default

This is one of the training manuals for police tazers in PDF format. Very straight forward. It shows the do's and don'ts of using these tazers. It is not recommended to do more than 15 seconds at a time, and also says the officer must first verify if a person if capable of complying and should avoid giving conflicting commands, must give the person time to regain control of their body after a shock so they can comply with commands. It says do not use ECD for verbal abuse or belligerence, do not use ECD for punishment. It even says further down not to target anywhere near the heart or in the chest area as to avoid heart complications. You can read the whole thing here: Taser.com
Stan.Dupp is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 12:54 PM   #6
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Fired???? What about being charged with assault? An assault that ended in death during the performance of his "duties".

Manslaugher should be the minimum result of this jackasses actions. They should also review their training policy to see if they were properly trained in the use of the Taser.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 01:29 PM   #7
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

JD, the reason I asked about the 15 seconds is because apparently everything that he did prior to exceeding the 15 seconds was by the book. Remember, he didn't go into that location looking for trouble - he was sent to do the hard job that the nurses and orderlies could not do. Yes, I think he went to far but firing is probably enough. He will have to live with what he did.
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 05:29 PM   #8
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
He will have to live with what he did.
And more than likely not rehired into a uniformed position.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 05:35 PM   #9
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
JD, the reason I asked about the 15 seconds is because apparently everything that he did prior to exceeding the 15 seconds was by the book. Remember, he didn't go into that location looking for trouble - he was sent to do the hard job that the nurses and orderlies could not do. Yes, I think he went to far but firing is probably enough. He will have to live with what he did.
In what circumstances would tazering an already handcuffed suspect ever be justified? And not a criminal act?
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 05:49 PM   #10
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chica Chaser View Post
In what circumstances would tazering an already handcuffed suspect ever be justified? And not a criminal act?
Your question "assumes" ...

.... the handcuffs were placed on the suspect with his hands behind his back ....

... doesn't it?

And I should probably say .... "his/her"
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 07:43 PM   #11
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chica Chaser View Post
In what circumstances would tazering an already handcuffed suspect ever be justified? And not a criminal act?
If the handcuffed person were a liberal, then I think it would be justified so they could get their mind right.
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 08:40 PM   #12
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default

JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 08:49 PM   #13
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
If the handcuffed person were a liberal, then I think it would be justified so they could get their mind right.


Tazering won't work on a tea party member you have to have feelings for it to be effective.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 09:42 PM   #14
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default Cool Hand Luke!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
If the handcuffed person were a liberal, then I think it would be justified so they could get their mind right.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 09:45 PM   #15
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
If the handcuffed person were a liberal, then I think it would be justified so they could get their mind right.
You haven't left yet? WTF is the holdup?

Time to get on the friggin' program!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved