Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61317
gman4453378
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48842
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2013, 02:42 AM   #1
SEE3772
Valued Poster
 
SEE3772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 14, 2011
Location: Key Largo
Posts: 1,384
Encounters: 7
Default EPA Draft Stirs Fears Of Radically Relaxed Radiation Guidelines


Gina McCarthy, US President Barack Obama's nominee to run the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) oversaw the revision of the Protective Action Guide Manual

The acting EPA director on Friday signed a revised version of the EPA’s Protective Action Guide for radiological incidents, which critics say radically relaxes the safety guidelines agencies follow in the wake of a nuclear-reactor meltdown, dirty-bomb attack, or other unexpected release of radiation.

Although the document is a draft published for public comment, it takes effect as an “interim use” guideline. And according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), that means agencies responding to radiation emergencies may permit many more civilian fatalities.

“In soil, the PAGs allow long-term public exposure to radiation in amounts as high as 2,000 millirems,” PEER advocacy director Kirsten Stade said in a press release. “This would, in effect, increase a longstanding 1 in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period.”

The non-binding document does not relax EPA’s standards, the agency has said in response to the criticism. But it directs agencies responding to radiation releases to standards at other agencies that are less stringent than EPA. Douglas Guarino has the scoop at NextGov, a publication that follows technology and government:

The new version of the guide released Friday does not include such dramatically relaxed guidelines in its text, but directs the reader to similar recommendations made by other federal agencies and international organizations in various documents. It suggests that they might be worth considering in circumstances where complying with [EPA's] own enforceable drinking water regulations is deemed impractical….

For example, the new EPA guide refers to International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines that suggest intervention is not necessary until drinking water is contaminated with radioactive iodine 131 at a concentration of 81,000 picocuries per liter. This is 27,000 times less stringent than the EPA rule of 3 picocuries per liter.

via EPA Relaxes Public Health Guidelines For Radiological Attacks, Accidents – Nextgov.com.

That EPA rule was designed for a lifetime of exposure, the IAEA guideline for short-term exposure.

The document was signed Friday by acting EPA Administrator Bob Perciasepe, but it developed under the Bush Administration and was revised under the supervision of Obama’s nominee for the top EPA post, Gina McCarthy, who has headed EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation since 2009. McCarthy faces a confirmation hearing before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Thursday.

EPA spokeswoman Julia Valentine told the Global Security Newswire that the agency “is not weakening cleanup standards,” but “building a bridge between managing the effects of a catastrophe and meeting existing environmental standards.” EPA updated the document to bring the science to current standards and to give agencies more guidance and flexibility in the wake of a catastrophe than a reiteration of EPA’s standards.

In a notice published Friday, Perciasepe states:

The 2013 PAG Manual is not a legally binding regulation or standard and does not supersede any environmental laws; PAGs are not intended to define “safe” or “unsafe” levels of exposure or contamination. This guidance does not address or impact site cleanups occurring under other statutory authorities such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Superfund program, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) decommissioning program, or other federal or state cleanup programs. As indicated by the use of non-mandatory language such as “may,” “should” and “can,” the 2013 Manual only provides recommendations and does not confer any legal rights or impose any legally binding requirements upon any member of the public, states, or any other federal agency. Rather, the 2013 PAG Manual recommends projected radiation doses at which specific actions may be warranted in order to reduce or avoid that dose. The 2013 PAG Manual is designed to provide flexibility to be more or less restrictive as deemed appropriate by decision makers based on the unique characteristics of the incident and the local situation.

The full draft “PAG Manual” is available here (pdf).

Source: Forbes


Safety: Jaczko Calls for Phaseout in US, Says Plants Aren't Safe

Friday, March 29, 2013

Summary

Former Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Gregory Jaczko says that the current fleet of operating plants in the US should be phased out because regulators can't guarantee against an accident causing widespread land contamination. In two key decisions last week Jaczko said the agency "damaged significantly" its international reputation for upholding safety and he accused the five commissioners of "just rolling the dice" in dealing with severe accidents.

Source: Nuclear Intelligence Weekly



Study: 28% Increase In Thyroid Problems In Babies Born After Fukushima In Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon And Washington
SEE3772 is offline   Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 11:39 PM   #2
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Isn't science amazing? We are now able to withstand more radiation than ever before! Incredible! Thank you, Mr. President!

[sarcasm alert]
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 01:57 AM   #3
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Read the report on the radioactive apartment building in Taiwan before you scream about radiation again.

This was an accidental large-scale human test of what we thought we knew about the effects of radiation exposure.

Figure 1 in the report tells most of the story quite graphically.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Everything we thought we knew may well be VERY wrong.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 02:12 AM   #4
LordBeaverbrook
Valued Poster
 
LordBeaverbrook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 4, 2011
Location: Bishkent, Kyrzbekistan
Posts: 1,439
Encounters: 18
Default

Jesus Christ, you people want less/no regulation but you bitch when someone, especially Obama, allegedly relaxes regulations. Gives renewed meaning to "damned if you do, damned if you don't"

Isn't radiation a scary word? Turns out we bathe in radiation of one sort or another every day (and most nights). As long as it isn't ionizing radiation, we CAN withstand more (or at least as much which is a hell of a lot) than every before. If most of you. especially you COG, had a clue about anything scientific it might be evidence you had a brain (then again maybe not). Watch out for vampires and zombies too!!!!!
LordBeaverbrook is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 02:16 AM   #5
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Kim Jong Un better not nuke us else he's gonna be in troublllllleee with new EPA bitch! What happened to the old EPA bitch? Oh, that's right she resigned but not in disgrace thanks to a complicit media.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 08:49 AM   #6
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by austxjr View Post
Isn't radiation a scary word? Turns out we bathe in radiation of one sort or another every day (and most nights). As long as it isn't ionizing radiation, we CAN withstand more (or at least as much which is a hell of a lot) than every before.
You too, dude.

Read the far-east fuckup report. That's the most accurate way I can characterize what happened. Someone fucked up ROYALLY, and, as a result, we got a large-scale human trial on the effects of long-term low-level ionizing radiation exposure.

Read the report for the details. They're all in there.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 04:19 PM   #7
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder View Post
Everything we thought we knew may well be VERY wrong.
that can be applied to just about any topic.
JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 04:36 PM   #8
SEE3772
Valued Poster
 
SEE3772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 14, 2011
Location: Key Largo
Posts: 1,384
Encounters: 7
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCRZxorkF3c
SEE3772 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 06:00 PM   #9
bojulay
Valued Poster
 
bojulay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 30, 2011
Location: I can see FTW from here
Posts: 5,611
Encounters: 8
Default

Doesn't Biden's hair seem to be glowing just a little bit.

Or is that just his brain trying to throw off the stupid.


ha ha ha ha
bojulay is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 06:06 PM   #10
bojulay
Valued Poster
 
bojulay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 30, 2011
Location: I can see FTW from here
Posts: 5,611
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE3772 View Post
Ann is radioactively hot.
bojulay is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 09:58 PM   #11
cptjohnstone
Valued Poster
 
cptjohnstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 3,631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojulay View Post
Ann is radioactively hot.
but these Fox reporters are even hotter, how could anybody not watch Fox

http://www.foxnewsgirls.com/Fox_News...l#.UWobRbXvtQ0
cptjohnstone is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 11:04 PM   #12
JCM800
Ambassador
 
JCM800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
Encounters: 29
Default Julie Banderas

Quote:
Originally Posted by cptjohnstone View Post
but these Fox reporters are even hotter, how could anybody not watch Fox

http://www.foxnewsgirls.com/Fox_News...l#.UWobRbXvtQ0
agreed

Attachment 209158
JCM800 is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 09:56 AM   #13
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800 View Post
that can be applied to just about any topic.
You too.

Read the paper.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved