Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 406
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
Starscream66 285
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 273
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70870
biomed164206
Yssup Rider61775
gman4453564
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48949
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37778
CryptKicker37281
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-02-2013, 12:45 AM   #76
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,775
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Yeah. I lied.
Now you're lying about that!

and BTW -- am I wrong, but aren't these horrendous tax increases just returning some people to the level of taxation they were at before the Bush tax cuts flushed it economy down the toilet?

and also BTW -- they didn't even deal with spending cuts, which trigger in two months unless some new deal is struck?

BTW -- wouldn't that make Whiny's math fuzzier than his ears?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 12:47 AM   #77
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Spending is the problem, not taxation. I sincerely doubt there will be any real spending cuts. Republicans will cave on that, too.
It's like being on an airplane that's gone into a dive. The passengers keep thinking the pilot's going pull out of the dive. Then it dawns on them he's going to take the plane into the ground at full speed and not even attempt to pull up. That's America. Obama is about to crash the system and he's doing it on purpose.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 12:47 AM   #78
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,775
Encounters: 67
Default

and BTW -- the House GOP punished Christie tonight by squashing the aid bill for Sandy. NO SOUP FOR YOUSE!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 12:49 AM   #79
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
and BTW -- the House GOP punished Christie tonight by squashing the aid bill for Sandy. NO SOUP FOR YOUSE!
It might do him some good to cut back on the soup.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 12:51 AM   #80
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
and BTW -- the House GOP punished Christie tonight by squashing the aid bill for Sandy. NO SOUP FOR YOUSE!
The word is "quash", idiot. Every post you show how stupid you are.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 12:54 AM   #81
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Those spending cuts won't materialize, in two months or two years.
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 01:01 AM   #82
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,775
Encounters: 67
Default

Hey joe hard, you continually accuse POTUS of intentionally trying to destroy America. Why don't you offer more than your paranoid pipe dreams to back that up? You're almost as tedious as the Unaliar.

Squash works, whiny. Look it up. So does abandon. So does piss on NJ. You're just grasping at straws. But at least you played the idiot card with me, which is your default comeback...

Predictable. Tedious. Untruthful. Self flagellant.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 05:04 AM   #83
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

FYI, here is a synopsis of the new law

--Income tax rates: Extends decade-old tax cuts on incomes up to $400,000 for individuals, $450,000 for couples. Earnings above those amounts would be taxed at a rate of 39.6 percent, up from the current 35 percent. Extends Clinton-era caps on itemized deductions and the phase-out of the personal exemption for individuals making more than $250,000 and couples earning more than $300,000.
--Estate tax: Estates would be taxed at a top rate of 40 percent, with the first $5 million in value exempted for individual estates and $10 million for family estates. In 2012, such estates were subject to a top rate of 35 percent.
--Capital gains, dividends: Taxes on capital gains and dividend income exceeding $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for families would increase from 15 percent to 20 percent.
--Alternative minimum tax: Permanently addresses the alternative minimum tax and indexes it for inflation to prevent nearly 30 million middle- and upper-middle income taxpayers from being hit with higher tax bills averaging almost $3,000. The tax was originally designed to ensure that the wealthy did not avoid owing taxes by using loopholes.
--Other tax changes: Extends for five years Obama-sought expansions of the child tax credit, the earned income tax credit, and an up-to-$2,500 tax credit for college tuition. Also extends for one year accelerated "bonus" depreciation of business investments in new property and equipment, a tax credit for research and development costs and a tax credit for renewable energy such as wind-generated electricity.
--Unemployment benefits: Extends jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed for one year.
--Cuts in Medicare reimbursements to doctors: Blocks a 27 percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors for one year. The cut is the product of an obsolete 1997 budget formula.
--Social Security payroll tax cut: Allows a 2-percentage-point cut in the payroll tax first enacted two years ago to lapse, which restores the payroll tax to 6.2 percent.
--Across-the-board cuts: Delays for two months $109 billion worth of across-the-board spending cuts set to start striking the Pentagon and domestic agencies this week. Cost of $24 billion is divided between spending cuts and new revenues from rule changes on converting traditional individual retirement accounts into Roth IRAs.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...fiscal-crisis/

Plus the requisite pork/payoffs, of course
Under the plan, the federal government would eat nearly $100 billion in forgone tax revenue over the next two years by extending special tax credits for select businesses that had been set to expire.
Including:
--$430 million for Hollywood through “special expensing rules” to encourage ----TV and film production in the United States. Producers can expense up to ---$15 million of costs for their projects.
--$331 million for railroads by allowing short-line and regional operators to claim a tax credit up to 50 percent of the cost to maintain tracks that they own or lease.
--$222 million for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands through returned excise taxes collected by the federal government on rum produced in the islands and imported to the mainland.
--$70 million for NASCAR by extending a “7-year cost recovery period for certain motorsports racing track facilities.”
--$59 million for algae growers through tax credits to encourage production of “cellulosic biofuel” at up to $1.01 per gallon.
--$4 million for electric motorcycle makers by expanding an existing green-energy tax credit for buyers of plug-in vehicles to include electric motorbikes.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...rum-producers/
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 10:52 AM   #84
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,341
Default

It's amazing to me that so many people seem to consider this some sort of victory. To what level of irresponsibility must Congress rise for some of you guys to register disapproval? Of course, these clowns abrogated their responsibilty back in the Summer of 2011 when they teed up this fiasco.

The spectacle of a bunch of sleep-deprived octogenarians in the Senate voting at 2 a.m. on New Year's Day is simply ridiculous beyond description.

And one thing that no one has mentioned (at least not in this thread) is that the "$600 billion" tax increase is unlikely to raise anywhere near that much revenue over the next 10 years. The further you go out on the tail of the income distribution, the more of the "anticipated revenue" simply pulls a disappearing act. That's due to some particulars of how our tax code works in practice. Of course, that doesn't really matter much to most politicians. This fraud is obviously much more about scoring a political victory than it is about enacting sound, sustainable economic policy.

And it was just the first episode in a series of political standoffs and crises. It's time to start teeing up the next one.

Expect plenty of chaos over the next year or two!
Texas Contrarian is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 11:27 AM   #85
TPJR
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Feb 10, 2010
Location: Lancaster,TX
Posts: 68
Encounters: 17
Default

There's a lot of blame that is rightfully aimed at Congress, but 1 thing people fail to realize is that "we the people" deserve probably as much blame as well. The fact is that these Congressmen and women didn't elect themselves into office; We did. This is what happens when people vote base on partisan demagogery and ignorance. This is the government we deserve.
TPJR is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 11:55 AM   #86
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TPJR View Post
There's a lot of blame that is rightfully aimed at Congress, but 1 thing people fail to realize is that "we the people" deserve probably as much blame as well. The fact is that these Congressmen and women didn't elect themselves into office; We did. This is what happens when people vote base on partisan demagogery and ignorance. This is the government we deserve.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 02:46 PM   #87
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight View Post
It's amazing to me that so many people seem to consider this some sort of victory. To what level of irresponsibility must Congress rise for some of you guys to register disapproval? Of course, these clowns abrogated their responsibilty back in the Summer of 2011 when they teed up this fiasco.

The spectacle of a bunch of sleep-deprived octogenarians in the Senate voting at 2 a.m. on New Year's Day is simply ridiculous beyond description.

And one thing that no one has mentioned (at least not in this thread) is that the "$600 billion" tax increase is unlikely to raise anywhere near that much revenue over the next 10 years. The further you go out on the tail of the income distribution, the more of the "anticipated revenue" simply pulls a disappearing act. That's due to some particulars of how our tax code works in practice. Of course, that doesn't really matter much to most politicians. This fraud is obviously much more about scoring a political victory than it is about enacting sound, sustainable economic policy.

And it was just the first episode in a series of political standoffs and crises. It's time to start teeing up the next one.

Expect plenty of chaos over the next year or two!
Cappy

Lets not worry though, they are going to get around to the real spending cuts...in a couple months. With a new congress.
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 02:51 PM   #88
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

This is in the "fiscal cliff" bill? Does NASCAR need corporate welfare? I guess so.

The "fiscal cliff" deal reached by the Senate and the White House on New Year's Eve, and passed in legislative form by the Senate early New Year's Day, includes many giveaways to special interests--including an extension of a perk enjoyed by "motorsports entertainment complexes" otherwise known as the "NASCAR tax credit."

The provision, under section 168(i)(15) of the federal tax code, allows speedways to write off their costs over seven years. Typically, such expensing occurs over a much longer period of time, from 15 to 39 years. The cost of the NASCAR tax credit to taxpayers has been estimated at some $40 million--over and above any tax incentives provided by state and local authorities.
Hollywood films also enjoy a tax incentive extension in the "fiscal cliff" deal. The 157-page bill may grow yet larger--and more lucrative for special interests--as the House adds amendments.


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-S...CAR-Tax-Credit
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 02:56 PM   #89
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

But wait! There's more!

The “fiscal cliff” compromise has been heralded as a saving grace for middle class taxpayers, their families and the unemployed.

But buried in the fine print of the 150-page deal are also some lesser-known New Year’s gifts to some of Washington’s favorite industries.
Under the plan, the federal government would eat nearly $100 billion in forgone tax revenue over the next two years by extending special tax credits for select businesses that had been set to expire.

While the provisions themselves are not new, and are often extended as part of major bills, their inclusion amidst a tumultuous year-end debate over deficits and debt did raise a few eyebrows.

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget listed the so-called “tax extenders” as a “bad” part of the fiscal cliff deal because their cost is not offset, “setting a bad precedent for future extensions.”

The mix of tax perks covering the next year, but with budget implications for the next two years includes everything from incentives for employers to hire veterans to incentives for employers to invest in mine safety. But it also includes these:

$430 million for Hollywood through “special expensing rules” to encourage TV and film production in the United States. Producers can expense up to $15 million of costs for their projects.

$331 million for railroads by allowing short-line and regional operators to claim a tax credit up to 50 percent of the cost to maintain tracks that they own or lease.

$222 million for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands through returned excise taxes collected by the federal government on rum produced in the islands and imported to the mainland.

$70 million for NASCAR by extending a “7-year cost recovery period for certain motorsports racing track facilities.”

$59 million for algae growers through tax credits to encourage production of “cellulosic biofuel” at up to $1.01 per gallon.

$4 million for electric motorcycle makers by expanding an existing green-energy tax credit for buyers of plug-in vehicles to include electric motorbikes.

*Note the price tags above reflect estimated forgone tax revenue if current credits – which have been due to expire – are extended for one year as included in the Senate bill, per Joint Committee on Taxation.


Are you kidding me? I thought this was about "responsible fiscal policy"?

Does Hollywood need a tax break? NASCAR? Rum producers? Algae growers? Seriously, algae growers? Electric motorcycle makers?

This is your Congress. Your tax dollars (and you children's and grandchildren's) at work. They should be ashamed.

They created the problem, then they congratulate each other when they "fix it." What a bunch of bullshitting liars.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...rum-producers/
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 02:59 PM   #90
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
This is in the "fiscal cliff" bill? Does NASCAR need corporate welfare? I guess so.

The "fiscal cliff" deal reached by the Senate and the White House on New Year's Eve, and passed in legislative form by the Senate early New Year's Day, includes many giveaways to special interests--including an extension of a perk enjoyed by "motorsports entertainment complexes" otherwise known as the "NASCAR tax credit."

The provision, under section 168(i)(15) of the federal tax code, allows speedways to write off their costs over seven years. Typically, such expensing occurs over a much longer period of time, from 15 to 39 years. The cost of the NASCAR tax credit to taxpayers has been estimated at some $40 million--over and above any tax incentives provided by state and local authorities.
Hollywood films also enjoy a tax incentive extension in the "fiscal cliff" deal. The 157-page bill may grow yet larger--and more lucrative for special interests--as the House adds amendments.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-S...CAR-Tax-Credit
I read all of this crap this morning, and it just makes your blood boil.
And I am a big NASCAR fan.
What in the hell are we doing subsidizing any for profit organization, much less one that reaps in millions.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved