Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
398 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70819 | biomed1 | 63644 | Yssup Rider | 61249 | gman44 | 53347 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48802 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37402 | CryptKicker | 37228 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
11-19-2012, 02:44 PM
|
#31
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
FACT JACK...backed up by both King and Graham, as well as the Chairman of the Intelligence Committee.
All 3 laid blame on the administration............
Read about it here.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hous...talking-points
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#32
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Other than spin, what sources do you have that says it wasn't the WH ?
Answer: None !
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:02 PM
|
#33
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Other than spin, what sources do you have that says it wasn't the WH ?
Answer: None !
|
Watch it again Whirlyturd, and listen this time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpu-C...ature=youtu.be
Quote:
“Basically it is still not clear how the final talking points emerged. (Petraeus) said it went through a long process involving many agencies including the Department of Justice, including the State Department and no one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points other than to say the original talking points prepared by the CIA were different from the ones that were finally put out,” said King.
|
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...azi-come-from/
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:10 PM
|
#34
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
You are doing a head fake MarxLover; typical of the left.
Talking points were approved by the CIA; but then they were changed......and most are now convinced that it was the WH who changed the talking points......
You're timeline is fictitious.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:11 PM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
You are doing a head fake MarxLover; typical of the left.
Talking points were approved by the CIA; but then they were changed......and most are now convinced that it was the WH who changed the talking points......
You're timeline is fictitious.
|
WRONG AGAIN WHIRLY
Quote:
“Basically it is still not clear how the final talking points emerged. (Petraeus) said it went through a long process involving many agencies including the Department of Justice, including the State Department and no one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points other than to say the original talking points prepared by the CIA were different from the ones that were finally put out,” said King.
|
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...azi-come-from/
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:11 PM
|
#36
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Sen. Saxbee: "At the hearing we had on Thursday and Friday, we had every leader of the intelligence community there, including folks from the State Department, the FBI -- everybody there was asked, 'Do you know who made these changes?' And nobody knew. The only entity that reviewed the talking points that was not there was the White House.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:14 PM
|
#37
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
The talking points that were approved were changed. FACT JACK.
And now most believe they were changed by the WH ! FACT JACK.
It is just a question of who at the White House. Likely political handlers from TeamObama Re-Election.
Look for the Obama White House to use Executive Privilege to protect themselves on this one.
Everything else you are writing is gorilla dust....you are trying to confuse for the purpose of obfuscation.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#38
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
And now most believe they were changed by the WH ! FACT JACK.
|
You have provided no proof of this. Till you do...NOT A FACT JACK.
Look up the word fact.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:20 PM
|
#39
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
watching the simpletons like whirlie shit, and fall face first in the plie over a nomonation that probably would have never happened in the first place is sad, and funny.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:23 PM
|
#40
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
The White House is the only party that hasn't testified to the very question you are convinced is settled................HAHAHAH AHAH ! But your faith in them is unquestionable....HAHAHAHAHA !
You are a dumb fool, following his master down the toilet of Marxism.....
Based on that fact alone it is a no-brainier that the Obama White House's hands are dirty on this one.
A few minutes ago you were maintaining that the Rice talking points were approved.......now you know otherwise, but are clining to the false hope that it wasn't Obama who made the changes.....HAHAHAHAH !!!
See the power of reason, facts and argument.
It is intimidating when you meet your superior isn't it Anti-American Marx ?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:25 PM
|
#41
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
The White House is the only party that hasn't testified to the very question you are convinced is settled................HAHAHAH AHAH ! But your faith in them is unquestionable....HAHAHAHAHA !
You are a dumb fool, following his master down the toilet of Marxism.....
Based on that fact alone it is a no-brainier that the Obama White House's hands are dirty on this one.
A few minutes ago you were maintaining that the Rice talking points were approved.......now you know otherwise, but are clining to the false hope that it wasn't Obama who made the changes.....HAHAHAHAH !!!
See the power of reason, facts and argument.
It is intimidating when you meet your superior isn't it Anti-American Marx ?
|
The day that your lying, wrong, false predicting ass is ever superior to anyone will be a sad day.
the white house??? What about the other agencies that touched it?
It's clear you have no interest in accepting the truth because you've made up your mind in your blind hatred of the president. I"m sorry you lost and he won. Get over it.
Quote:
“Basically it is still not clear how the final talking points emerged. (Petraeus) said it went through a long process involving many agencies including the Department of Justice, including the State Department and no one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points other than to say the original talking points prepared by the CIA were different from the ones that were finally put out,” said King.
|
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...azi-come-from/
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:28 PM
|
#42
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Again, you need to read and learn....As Saxbee said: "the committee asked every agency, except the White House".................. The only entity that reviewed the talking points that was not there was the White House.
I appreciate that this is a convoluted story line with a lot of players, complex timelines, and political shenanigans....it is likely above your pay grade to be able to understand, analyze, and critically discern..
Quote:
Originally Posted by markroxny
the white house??? What about the other agencies that touched it?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:31 PM
|
#43
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
|
That's not proof of anything Whirlyturd!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
"Now, with the allegation that the White House changed those talking points, that is false," Feinstein said. "There is only one thing that was changed, and I’ve checked into this. I believe it to be absolute fact. And that was the word 'consulate' was changed to 'mission'. That’s the only change that anyone in the White House made, and I have checked this out."
|
From your own post Whirlyturd!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#44
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Good you are admitting the crack is in the damn; Feinstein has admitted to minor WH changes to the talking points...it is only a matter of time before she will admit to the substantive changes that everyone knows, and the White House is hiding....
Why didn't the WH have someone testify at the committee MarxyWhoHatesAmericanPrinciple s ?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-19-2012, 03:36 PM
|
#45
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Again, you need to read and learn....As Saxbee said: "the committee asked every agency, except the White House"..................The only entity that reviewed the talking points that was not there was the White House.
I appreciate that this is a convoluted story line with a lot of players, complex timelines, and political shenanigans....it is likely above your pay grade to be able to understand, analyze, and critically discern..
|
fine ... dont nominate rice.
The End
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|