Quote:
Originally Posted by Doglegg
I like rolling things this way for these simple reasons -
1. Does the provider actually screen? A safe provider makes a safe hobbyist.
2. If our mutual needs don't mesh - activities, time/rate, then there will not be a number three.
3. If all above is agreed upon, time and date become less important, as my working schedule is not always to my timing. If #1 and #2 have already been met, then I know who to contact when our schedules are mutually beneficial.
4. If all of the above is achieved, then a first time meeting is more like old friends without all of the other awkwardness.
|
Agreed to 4.
HOWEVER (aaand here it comes, lol....waaaait for it
). All well and good, so long as the applicant isn't expecting a speedy turnaround. I prefer all out commitment from a potential client with the initiative to recon "activities/menu" first. Screening IS time consuming; emailing, etc, especially from a phone, can be extremely time-consuming in light of the fact that many of us have fulltime responsibilites requiring the bulk of our time and attention directed elsewhere. Be informed, I say, lol! (Vote "White Queen"
) Reviews, interestngly enough (worthy of note, shall We say), are a great deal more than soft porn
From a seasoned vet's perspective, I appreciate:
"Hi, my name is...I do such and such (when I'm not out trolling for cooch, lol). Age, physical description, applicable references, and approximate date/time/activity sought."
I can then respond with my particular screening criteria, if not already covered, and SCORE (on both ends, lol).
Tres efficient .
At any rate
, mein .02$...give or take a benji , heheheh...
TWQ