plus a million! (which is the age in years Foxy will be soon if the trolls have their way!)
Aoi elsewhere called the age obsession “
pretty amateur levels of trolling” and this latest thread again highlights that. Given that, and the good points about age being mainly a personal preference based on mood and context (though provider
youth is in general an evolution-based, perennial desideratum in this hobby as in life at large), I should probably emulate the more enlightened hobbyists and simply refrain from responding. Especially since the trolls aren't really concerned with facts or truth.
But because some few susceptible readers might still be misled, I’ll make this humble little effort once again.
We’ve
heard this same tired and absurd claim that OP makes, in exactly the same words no less (!), from a number of different handles now. The
staggering illogic and confrontational confidence of the enforced and smug ignorance – “the world is flat, the world is flat” – remains transparently fake and biased.
Exhibit A is how Foxy suddenly became her true age (early twenties) when she temporarily shifted spas for a day, and is now being ludicrously attacked again as somehow “old” now that she’s back at Blue. I won't single out the specific negative nanny hobbyists who first attacked her as old, then shamelessly
bumped her reviews at the temporary new place with high praise for her youth (!), because you can research them yourself to see the more outrageous instances if you wish.
There’s not even the semblance of intellectual or moral honesty here: everyone knows or should know that
a “thought experiment” (just like a supposedly “rational” economic theory in that ludicrous thread) gives way to actual experience, evidence, and facts.
As Kathleen Wilkes wrote in her 1988 book on the subject,
Real People: Personal Identity without Thought Experiments, when such facts are available, fiction and fantasy should be avoided. She rightly points out (right up front on page 2) that
in such circumstances such thought experiments are “both problematic and positively misleading.”
The
widespread fact-based testimony from many experienced hobbyists, in numerous reviews, ancient and current, should be sufficient to
refute the silly notion that one never finds genuinely young girls in AMPs. Just go to Blue at present, where
most of the girls are in their twenties, attractive, and Catholic as well. But these trolls would never let the facts get in the way of their agenda-driven theories!
Let’s let them continue to live in their imaginary world debating how many angels dance on the heads of pins in the manner of the medieval scholastic theologians.
The rest of us living in the real world can continue to enjoy the fruits of the true young angels at Blue, Lucky Haven, Luxury, NYNY, Rainbow, Lilly, and wherever else they may be found.
Thought Experiment on Ages
