GOP to Norquist -- Kiss My Ass!

[Yssup Rider]

with the fiscal cliff coming quickly into view, Congressional Republicans are finally growing the balls to tell No Tax bully Grover Norquist to go fuck himself.

We'll see how his plays out in 2014 but it appears there's actually a chance that there might a deal made!

Norquist is scum. I can't believe he has cajoled so many dipshits to sign his pledge. But now...
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/grove...ry?id=17807568

[cptjohnstone]

he is not a dipshit?

[Yssup Rider]

No, he's too evil to be a dipshit. probably too smart too.

where do you stand on these promise breaking tax and spend Republicans?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

he is not a dipshit?

You're probably correct. Grover is not a dipshit. The members of Congress who are stupid enough to sign his pledge are the dipshits!

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by bigtex

You're probably correct. Grover is not a dipshit. The members of Congress who are stupid enough to sign his pledge are the dipshits!

+1

[CJ7]

Grover is a mupppet on sesame street ..

Big Bird is a muppet on sesame street


ironic eh?

[fetishfreak]

It is not a matter of whether tax increases will occur. That is a forgone conclusion at this point. It is a matter of whether any true spending cuts will occur that will be debated ad nauseum. In the end I feel it will be much like the email privacy bill, it will look nothing like what it is called.

They will probably call it something catchy like the Tax simplification and spending reduction act. Of course it will not simplify any tax code and will cut one tiny amount of funding from some politically agreeable program like the 2.6 million spent training Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job. However it will increase spending by 1000 times that amount in all the pork that will be necessary to get the votes on both sides of the aisle.

http://prognosis.med.wayne.edu/artic...-spread-of-hiv

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by fetishfreak

It is not a matter of whether tax increases will occur. That is a forgone conclusion at this point. It is a matter of whether any true spending cuts will occur that will be debated ad nauseum. In the end I feel it will be much like the email privacy bill, it will look nothing like what it is called.

They will probably call it something catchy like the Tax simplification and spending reduction act. Of course it will not simplify any tax code and will cut one tiny amount of funding from some politically agreeable program like the 2.6 million spent training Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job. However it will increase spending by 1000 times that amount in all the pork that will be necessary to get the votes on both sides of the aisle.

http://prognosis.med.wayne.edu/artic...-spread-of-hiv

I don't know about you but I think Dr. Xiaoming basically made himself a quick 2.6 Mil. just to party with a bunch of Ho's. Just saying.

[fetishfreak]

Makes you wonder if any secret service advanced teams were around.

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by fetishfreak

Makes you wonder if any secret service advanced teams were around.

Oh don't you know it. They wouldn't miss that gig for nothing, lol.

[Yssup Rider]

You boys are pathetic. where are you assholes going after you suck the life out of this cou try?

FAGS

[markroxny]

[CJ7]

poor Grovie

[markroxny]

Every day, more Republicans in Congress are backing away from Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquit’s anti-tax pledge. For more than 20 years, the pledge, which stipulates that those who sign will never — under any circumstance — vote to raise taxes while in Congress, has virtually been a requirement for Congressional Republicans. According to ATR, just 16 of the 234 House Republicans and 6 of the 45 Senate Republicans that comprise the 113th Congress did not sign the pledge. However, the pledge may not have the staying power it once did. As of this writing, more than a dozen House Republicans — including Majority Leader Eric Cantor — and 10 GOP senators have distanced themselves from the pledge to one degree or another. Here are just a few examples or what members had to say:

— Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH): “The only pledge that keeps me up at night is the pledge I owe to the people of New Hampshire and our country to work as hard as I can to make sure America doesn’t go bankrupt.”
– Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA): “I care more about my country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge . . . I don’t worry about that because I care too much about my country. I care a lot more about it than I do Grover Norquist.”
– Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN): “Well, I’m not obligated on the pledge. I made Tennesseans aware, I was just elected, that the only thing I’m honoring is the oath I take when I’m sworn in this January.”
– Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA): “When I go to the constituents, it’s not about that pledge. It’s about trying to solve problems.”
– Rep. Peter King (R-NY): “A pledge is good at the time you sign it . . . In 1941, I would have voted to declare war on Japan. But each Congress is a new Congress. And I don’t think you can have a rule that you’re never going to raise taxes or that you’re never going to lower taxes. I don’t want to rule anything out.”
– Rep. Timothy Johnson (R-IL): “I would never in a million years have considered this as some kind of a locked-in-granite pledge. Frankly, I didn’t even remember it. That shows you how obscure it was to me.”

Other Senators that have signed the pledge and distanced themselves from Norquist include Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE), and Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY). House Republicans also jumping ship include: Rep. John Boehner (R-OH), Rep. Chris Gibson (R-NY), Rep. Reid Ribble (R-WI), Rep. Tom Latham (R-IA), Rep. Rick Crawford (R-AR), Rep. Pat Meehan (R-PA), Rep. Jon Runyan (R-NJ), Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE), Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA), Rep. Charlie Bass (R-NH), Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK), Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID), Rep. John Kline (R-MN), Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-MN), Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-MN), Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE), Rep. Scott Rigell (R-VA), Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), Rep. Tom Reed (R-NY), Rep. Allen West (R-FL), Rep. Robert Dold (R-IL), and Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon (R-CA).

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...cans-norquist/