When Being the Top Dog is Not a Good Thing

[Guest042715]

OK, So after my latest excursion my curiosity has gotten the better of me and i have to ask:

From the ladies stand point is being on top uncomfortable?

The latest was probably the 10th or 12th time in the last couple years i've been told no when i've asked someone to get on top. For me this is my go to when i'm finding it difficult to bring a date to a conclusion. The feel of a womens body on mine, breasts rubbing on my chest, hot breath on my neck and my hands full of ass and i'm done.

I've been told three or four times its bad knees and almost the same amount of bad backs and even more "I just dont like it"

I'm fine with what ever the reason but i'm just curious. It seems to me that it is basically the same postion as 69 or doggy. In fact it would almost seem better as you would have your weight on your partner and not on your knees or back.

In most reviews you just see MPCFS and never think that this is not one of them.

I can understand if a guy is maybe a little larger, both in body and in shlongness, but i'm neither.

Again just curious and will add to my list of "what do you do and not do questions"

Appreciate the insight - SES

[L.A.]

No CG=dealbreaker

A while back I saw a very popular provider and had a GREAT time untill she told me she had a bad back and didn't want to do CG. I didn't seek out a return visit.
Like any other position I'm sure it comes down to personal preference for each provider.
I would appreciate it very much if it was included in a review if a provider declined my favorite position.

[Guest091314]

I never knew how much I loved CG until lately, used to hate it. Its a tad difficult with a man with a large mid section but if he is strong I could always cross my legs on his chest as long as it wont hurt hurt him.

What I do love about it is if he grabs my ass to hint his desired pace.

[bigdog0311]

One reason is some guys have too small of a dick to do CG well, if at all, another is alot of guys are too fat to where CG would be an uncomfortable position to do for any length of time for her as she would have to keep holding their "fat rolls" up or keep sliding down and off, that is not fun and breaks the concentration of having a good time. Another factor is they may think guys are either ugly and/or just do not want to look at him and/or they are "go through the motions" providers in that they do not want you to see their face as they are off in "another world". Another factor to keep in mind is that doing CG means she has to "give" it is alot more "work" for her to do CG and RCG, than any other sex position, she may want to do as less work as possible, and just receive. I do not know why she would want to actually do most of the "work" to let the client relax some and enjoy the session, especially since, in most cases, she is getting paid multiple Ben Franklins, do you?

Many times, those are the reasons that providers say that K9 is their favorite position.

[Guest050619-1]

While I LOVE CG and RCG, my (current ATF's) inability to go very long (bad knee) in either of these positions is not a dealbreaker for me at all. The pressure it exerts on her knee has got to take it's toll after a while (especially if most other clients insist she perform this actitivity.) And since my fave position (mish) is hers, as well, that's just fine.....we both still have outstanding O's doing that (and she's not reaching for another painpill come the end of our time together).

[Guest020720]

Here ya go...

Honest Angie at your service.

Factors for why CG doesn't work for every guy I see:

1. His dick isn't big enough for me to "really" ride. I have a big ass. I am not a tiny little spinner girl. And Asain Cow girl is just not in my "bag of tricks" yet with my 36 " inseam legs and my 35 yr old "just starting to get back into shape body.
When I get going in CG I,
a) want it to stay in
b) want the condom to stay on
c) want to feel it (so I can keep up with a & b)

2. Some of you guys are just lazy ass fucks. I'm not going to ride you in CG for 45 fucking minutes. Are you kidding me? I do have a fucked up back. I see a specialist for this and have had 3 procedures to try and eliminate some of the pain and eliminate some of the medication. So, yeah - if you were expecting a full session of CG - maybe you should have mentioned that before you booked with me. I would have told you before I said, "sure, let's meet!" that I wasn't your girl if that's what you wanted. I have NO PROBLEM turning down a client if I feel I won't be able to provide what it is he is wanting.

I don't have ANY reviews that state "ANGIE RODE MY DICK FOR AN HOUR STRAIGHT". So, for the guys who walk in to see a provider and get all dick hurt that their girl isn't doing that for them - maybe they should double check their facts before they assume that kind of shit.

3. I may already be tired from holding your gut out of the way to get to your dick for a blow job...

I can only hold it up out of the way for so much longer to ride you in Cow Girl too...

I mean, really. I don't have Madonna's muscular arms or anything for Pete's sake. Some days you might just have to pick one if it's me you are seeing, and it's been proven I have phenomenal dick sucking skills. If I were a dude - I would choose the BBBJ vs CG if it were just the two....(but of course, other FS activities would be involved...I'm just saying, CG is NOT in my current strong suite when it comes to ALL dick sizes and body types).


***and honestly, the same thing can go for the smaller dicked guys who try to get at a girl in K9 who has a phat ass. We have to be a bit more careful and can't really go at it like other guys can. You've got to make sure you can get to it. LOL
It's not my fault God gave me all this junk in the trunk. Even when I was a lot thinner I had this phat ass. It's not that I want a giant dick to fuck me all the time. My perfect dick is average. Swear on it. But to the smaller dicked guys, don't be hating on us non-CG "loving" girls.

LOL

[darkchoc6]

Angie, that shit had me rolling. Thanks for cracking me the fuck up.

[Guest042715]

Bdog, I agree with the K9, most just don't want to look at my face. They see me and go "lets do doggy, Its my Favvvvvorite"

TNT, if you'll allow me one little conceit, none of those options apply to me No really!

I think we may be confusing it a little. I'm not so much talking CG as more of a reverse mish but with the legs kneeling on the side. I can see how this might hurt with bad knees but no more im thinking than some K9 postions.

all good reasons though.

[Daen1304]

Originally Posted by sinkerswim

Bdog, I agree with the K9, most just don't want to look at my face. They see me and go "lets do doggy, Its my Favvvvvorite"

TNT, if you'll allow me one little conceit, none of those options apply to me No really!

I think we may be confusing it a little. I'm not so much talking CG as more of a reverse mish but with the legs kneeling on the side. I can see how this might hurt with bad knees but no more im thinking than some K9 postions.

all good reasons though.

So as if they are straddling a sabien-type device?

I don't have a lot of input, but what if the girl has had a busy day? On top is a lot of work. I generally like to switch things up to try to share the effort myself. But if you really want to know how much effort is involved try stacking a couple of pillows, and try performing the maneuver on them to see how long you can keep up the motion. Probably would be a damn good cardio work out.

[eccienewbie]

Whoa! Don't spoil the illusion. When I hear comments about injuries and conditions from providers, I find myself thinking about Fred Garvin: Male Prostitute and his "rather elaborate series of trusses." Just tell us we're too fat and/or unattractive. That's hotter than comments about your own conditions. lol.

For the uninitiated http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7m...garvin-mal_fun ("truss" part starts at around the 4:45 mark)

[Oppa]

Funny that the AMP girls don't have any problems going cowgirl whether tall or short, thin or not as thin. Over the years, my AMP sessions have been probably 70% CG/RCG/ACG, 20% mish and 10% doggie. And no, I don't demand it of the provider. I actually offer to go mish or doggie quite often.

[bigdog0311]

Originally Posted by Oppa

Funny that the AMP girls don't have any problems going cowgirl whether tall or short, thin or not as thin. Over the years, my AMP sessions have been probably 70% CG/RCG/ACG, 20% mish and 10% doggie. And no, I don't demand it of the provider. I actually offer to go mish or doggie quite often.

The reason for the AMP analogy is pretty clear. The Korean/Asian girls, while they are also doing the "providing" for money, they have been brought up and have it etched in their brain that their jobs as females is to "take care of" their men. It kinda goes with my analogy in my first post in this thread.

[Oppa]

The reason for the AMP analogy is pretty clear. The Korean/Asian girls, while they are also doing the "providing" for money, they have been brought up and have it etched in their brain that their jobs as females is to "take care of" their men. It kinda goes with my analogy in my first post in this thread.

Agreed. Hence, that's why I love the Korean girls and am exclusively an AMP patron.

[gimme_that]

Its just pure lazyness plain and simple. I always ask about on top activities after screening. If she won't ride on top I know for a good remainder of the night Ill be doing all the work. I have to have my asian cg.

In my experiences its been more of the more mature providers who don't prefer this position, and ladies who are more especially curvey than others. I have had a few exceptions but its a must for me or I won't book her at all.

[L.A.]

So are there any providers reading this that are PRO cowgirls?
The amp girls probably can't be beat but who out there is really good at CG, ACG and RCG and RACG? I'm not talking about going 30 minutes straight just who really likes it and has good technique?