Quote:
Originally Posted by wellendowed1911
Ok barring some drastic change it looks like the GOP nomination is for Romney or Perry to lose -although anything can happen- but do you see any of the other people running as possible VP selections? For example if Romney wins could you see him choosing Cain or Bachman as a running mate? Or would a Perry/Paul or a Perry/Huntsman ticket do well?
I honestly think the only ones I could see accepting a VP nod is either Huntsman/Santorum- I think all the other ones have too big of an ego to play second fiddle. I honestly think whoever wins will choose a well known VP as running mate like Christie or Rubio- I doubt very seriously we will have a Sarah Palin type surprise.
|
Perry's ship is sinking! The boat is listing and he's taking on water fast. Thats one of the few things the mainstream media has gotten right about Rick Perry. Each debate he has participated in it's only gotten worse and worse, and he's one of the two getting the most speaking time besides Romney. Perry's definitely not quick witted.
I don't think Romney would choose Cain or Bachman as a VP. It's pretty evident that Romney is going to be a pro Wall St. fat cat and pro banker bail out type of guy. I can't see any GOP candidate choosing Rick Perry as a VP. Rick Perry is turning out to be political poison on the grand stage even though the establishment republicans would love to welcome Perry to the White House.
One things for sure, you will never see a Perry/Paul ticket! That will never happen. The elites that run this country don't want to see Ron Paul win. The people that are pro BIG government don't want to see Ron Paul win either. The only GOP candidate that is going to choose Ron Paul as their VP is Governor Johnson and he's not going to get the nomination. Santorum is not going to get the nomination either because he is pro war and wants the country in another conflict which is highly unpopular right now. All you have to do is listen to Santorum talk in these debates to find that out. I don't think Newt's going to get it either. Bachman no way Jose. The establishment knows that Bachman would not fare well against Obama. They want someone who can win against Obama.
Huntsman said he would take Cain as his VP but I don't trust Cain because I believe he was a board member of one of the branches of the federal reserve. Cain is status quo all the way, keep things as they are, no change. The difference between Cain and Obama is that Cain is a true black man 100%, Obama is not. This is coming from the perspective of someone who is not black, I'm just putting that out there. If it came down to Cain and Obama I would choose Cain, but I no that he is not going to solve our problems. Why? Because Herman Cain is RICH, thats why! Rich people think differently from you and I. If you've ever seen that movie "Platoon" by Oliver Stone there's an important quote by King (Keith David),
"Shiiit, you gotta be rich in the first place to think like that. Ever'body know, the poor are always being fucked over by the rich. Always have, always will." There's a lot of truth in that line!
The achilles heel for Herman Cain is that he's never been a politician. However, I do think he is handling himself quite well for never being a politician. Second, most Americans view Obama as black, the majority of white voters are not going to put another black man in the white house so soon unless he's a Ron Paul type truly for the people. Even though Obama does stand a chance for reelection since he is the incumbent. Third, Cain's not getting promoted by the GOP establishment like Perry and Romney are. I'll give Cain some credit though because he threw his hat in the ring as a businessman unlike Donald Trump.
I agree with you on Sarah Palin, she's out of the equation.