what is up with e.com reviews now??

[Guest011914-1]

ok i just got a call from another provider and was asking me about reviews and i checked and they are really limted? what is the deal? and why is no one from the site contacting us with brief updates on the changes? I understand they can't impede an ongoing investigation but someone can email us off the another computer and give us some info....and put some rumors to rest...any input?

[biomed1]

I was just on the E.Com site. They have removed the comments sections of the review "form". The review is posted immediately to the providers profile. There is a statement that this is due to changes they felt they needed to make, or words to that effect.

I looked around the site quite a bit, and it seems that VIP status for submitting reviews is a thing of the past. All references to obtaining VIP status reflect a payment schedule.

Time will tell what this really means.

Be Careful & Enjoy!

Biomed1

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by biomed1

I looked around the site quite a bit, and it seems that VIP status for submitting reviews is a thing of the past. All references to obtaining VIP status reflect a payment schedule.

Time will tell what this really means.

Be Careful & Enjoy!

Biomed1

IMHO, any kind of payment means exposure to your RL ID. Might as well undress in front of LE.

[tia travels]

It might be more fun to undress in front of you.

[MrGiz]

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

IMHO, any kind of payment means exposure to your RL ID. Might as well undress in front of LE.

Is there a law against joining a website.... any website?

Do you have any idea , how widespread your identity is, at this very moment?

Giz

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by MrGiz

Is there a law against joining a website.... any website?

Do you have any idea , how widespread your identity is, at this very moment?

Giz

huh???

[burkalini]

I think e.com is dead. The reviews are now down to being worthless. May they RIP

[MrGiz]

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

huh???

My point was.... If LE really, really, really wanted to know who Charlestudor2005 or MrGiz is.... we've both given away enough info a long time ago!!

Paying to join a legal website will do no further harm....

Giz's $.02

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by MrGiz

My point was.... If LE really, really, really wanted to know who Charlestudor2005 or MrGiz is.... we've both given away enough info a long time ago!!

Paying to join a legal website will do no further harm....

Giz's $.02

That's what I thought you meant. It's the fallacy of anonymity.

[Cpalmson]

Well, E.com can kiss my ass if they want me to pay for their now worthless service. Also, E,com girls (those that have profiles there), expect us guys to ask more questions in regards to services offered and donation rates. Without any useful reviews on E.com and their now policy of no discussion concerning rates, guys WILL ask for the info. So please don't get all bent out of shape when we do ask. When there is an information vacuum, questions get asked.

[Tiffany Cums]

I don't sign on to e.com anymore, not since the red flag was raised.

[naughtynatale]

I am with you Tiffany. I did have a friend use the Vanilla Visa with fake everything. It worked for now. But I am not using that site for now.

[Nina Rae]

This really sucks. (1) It was really easy to get business there (at least 70% for me) because of the way reviews were displayed, (2) Gents could see exactly what was on the menu, which cut out unnecessary conversation, and (3) they were just starting to add features I liked (i.e. available now). Grrrrr....

Most of my reviews were there, so boooo to having things move to the wild side with them too. It was the first place I ever posted an indy add! *sniff, sniff* RIP e.com. I'll miss you to pieces.

As for questions about the menu...P411 still exists (with indicators of what's ok and what's not) and is important to have, now more than ever.

[Blackhawk101]

Here is what I received-
You can't even see your on reviews.

Thank you for contacting us.

Because of certain changes we have deemed necessary to make to the website, we have removed the General and Specific Details sections from Reviews. When you read a review you will now only see the answers to questions listed on the review submission form that are for Escort Appearance, Visit Location, and Escort Review Rating.

We will no longer be awarding the Free VIP membership for a review submission.

If you have suggestions for additional questions you think would be a valid addition to the Review submission form please use the SUGGESTIONS link on the Members Console and send us your suggestions.

We apologize for the inconvenience.

Customer Service
Escorts.com

[ANONONE]

So in other words my "lifetime membership" that I purchased years ago is now worthless. All of my posted reviews on their once useful site are now just as worthless becuase they took a hacksaw to them.

Can ECOM be redeemed?

Hmmm. . .they want a check the box form that makes them (and I guess by extension, us) a bit more covered from prosecution/litigation. . . and they want us to do the legwork on design. . .

What would a CHECK THE BOX REVIEW look like?

1) Was her rate reasonable? [y] [n]
2) Did she at least appear to screen? [y] [n]
3) Was her communication timely and courteous? [y] [n]
4) Are her pictures accurate? [y] [n]
5) If this was an outcall, was she punctual? [y] [n]
6) If this was an incall, was the place safe and pleasant? [y] [n]
7) Is she a smoker? [y] [n]

Now it gets tricky. . .we would have to read between the lines with perhaps a vague list of qualities that can be rated by numbers:

8) How well did she put you at ease and help you relax? [1-10]
9) How well did she perform the desired tasks of the session [1-10]
10) How fit and active was she during the session? [1-10]
11) How was her demeanor during the session []rushed and mechanical []comfortable and casual []sleek and seductive
12) How would you rate her knowledge and ability to perform the desired tasks of your session? [1-10]

Ah fuck it. . .this is too much work for a dying site.

LONG LIVE ECCIE!