Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
396 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
279 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70795 | biomed1 | 63272 | Yssup Rider | 61003 | gman44 | 53295 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48665 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42669 | CryptKicker | 37220 | The_Waco_Kid | 37067 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
06-20-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Brian Terry's Mother Comments on Fast and Furious
This is a Facebook post by Josephine Terry, Brian Terry's mother, on the Obama Administration's decision to cover up, er, I mean, claim executive privilege on the Fast and Furious documents.
http://www.reagancoalition.com/artic...ry-mother.html
It sounds like she'd like the documents disclosed.
God Bless you, Mrs. Terry!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 04:40 AM
|
#2
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Sounds like she needs to get with Pat Tillman's mother and see what a fucked up government we have on both sides of the aisle.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 05:12 AM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
|
Why don't COF, Barleybrains, Whirly, or the other retards on the right ever mention such things?
Besides Tillman, I keep thinking about KBR electrocuting soldiers and civilians for profit and Halliburton supplying contaminated water to troops while Sean Hannity and Lush Bimbo scream about the President!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 12:00 PM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I'm appalled by that, too, Stevie, but that's not the issue before us. Try to pay attention. Or do you support our government giving guns to criminals and then covering it up?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 01:17 PM
|
#5
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I'm appalled by that, too, Stevie, but that's not the issue before us. Try to pay attention. Or do you support our government giving guns to criminals and then covering it up?
|
What I do not support is the selective outrage over each incident.
No different than turning the other cheek and saying nothing when say a white person commits a crime and then screaming bloody murder when you see a black person commit the same crime.
Makes you go Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 01:39 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
the cover up is protecting the undercover agents that had dealings with the boys on the other side of the border who just happen to be known as ruthless killers of men, women, children, family members and friends of anyone hat fucks with them
sure 1 death of a border patrol officer is a bad deal, but would everyone feel better if the AG and the Prez turned over all the paperwork to the fucksticks in congress and a few names made it back to Mexico and the friends and families of the undercover agents were put on a hit list, then executed by the Cartels gang members on this side of the border ???
thats the issue COF et al.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
That isn't even the reason they gave for the EP claim. They knew no one would buy that bullshit. I'm sure those names could be redacted. If they had asked Congress if those names could be redacted and the rest of the documents submitted, we wouldn't be here.
They are hiding criminal or embarrassing decisions made by the Administration. Holder should have been removed long ago.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 02:46 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
That isn't even the reason they gave for the EP claim. They knew no one would buy that bullshit. I'm sure those names could be redacted. If they had asked Congress if those names could be redacted and the rest of the documents submitted, we wouldn't be here.
They are hiding criminal or embarrassing decisions made by the Administration. Holder should have been removed long ago.
|
that your opinion
Im reasonably sure you wouldnt trust congress or any branch of this government to take your name off any documnetation if it meant your life or the lives of you family ... would you?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#9
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
They do it all the time. That isn't the issue. You know they're hiding something that we, by right, should know. That's called a coverup. And it's illegal.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 02:52 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
They do it all the time. That isn't the issue. You know they're hiding something that we, by right, should know. That's called a coverup. And it's illegal.
|
by right?
do tell what RIGHT YOU have to know the details of this or any undercover operation?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 03:00 PM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I have the right to know how lawless our chief law enforcement officer is. That's not protected by any privilege.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 03:15 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I have the right to know how lawless our chief law enforcement officer is. That's not protected by any privilege.
|
show me in the constitution exactly where it gives you the RIGHT to have privy to any undercover sting past or present
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#13
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
You are changing the subject once again. Since you can't understand what is being said, I will not respond. Try Hooked-On-Phonics or something. You are really having trouble with comprehension and understanding. I think you can get help at a local community college. Call them today.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 03:49 PM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You are changing the subject once again. Since you can't understand what is being said, I will not respond. Try Hooked-On-Phonics or something. You are really having trouble with comprehension and understanding. I think you can get help at a local community college. Call them today.
|
you clearly stated you have the right, I ask you to prove that you do have that RIGHT and you cahnge the subject entirely by deflecting to comprehension and understanding.
yeah well, go back and lay down .. if we need you we'll have whirlie whistle or something.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-21-2012, 03:58 PM
|
#15
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I'll respond to your question once you provide proof that you passed a reading comprehension course. Otherwise, it's a waste of time.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|