Generosa (Just a passing thought)

[bladtinzu]

So according to the below she really doesn't want the hassle of being a full time escort..

Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

She made her conditions perfectly clear to me.

She doesn't want to give her own number out.
She doesn't want to deal with screening, scheduling or booking hotels.
She doesn't want to escort on a regular basis.

So my thought for today (being that it is time to change up SB's) was how about a SD/SB type of deal?

No screening, only one guy has the number, no booking hotels, and a supplemental income which is guaranteed every month.

Just a thought ya know..

[Guest030317]

LOL!

[Ginger Doll]

More heckling & pushing from Blad?? I'm shocked.

Please don't quote me from a thread started by me, and closed at my request due to harassment of this very nature...

[bladtinzu]

Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

More heckling & pushing from Blad?? I'm shocked.

Please don't quote me from a thread started by me, and closed at my request due to harassment of this very nature...

Still with the egotistical slanted view one is heckling you? One has to be of true importance for that to happen. One day you will get there. Till then it was just an idea/question. Wasn't like I was offering 10k a month and screwing up the SB market in the state now was it?

And said thread is still open in public view so take your demands and shove them.

Or have your boy delete it from public view.

[Ginger Doll]

Ignore. Because Rolaids isn't the only way to spell 'relief.'

[bladtinzu]

So the older more senior high mileage one blocked me?

This day just got way better!!

[Ginger Doll]

An added tidbit of pertinent information...

Bladtard has my phone number. He's never contacted me about Generosa privately. Not once.

So, my take on it is that the issue on display isn't really the issue...

I think Bladtard just likes to leave a trail of public drama & angst wherever he goes.

Could Bladtard possibly be overcompensating for something? A much smaller 'issue,' perhaps?

[bladtinzu]

Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

An added tidbit of pertinent information...

Bladtard has my phone number. He's never contacted me about Generosa privately. Not once.

So, my take on it is that the issue on display isn't really the issue...

I think Bladtard just likes to leave a trail of public drama & angst wherever he goes.

Could Bladtard possibly be overcompensating for something? A much smaller 'issue,' perhaps?

Humm Never huh? I think I have postable proof which proved the high mileage nose in everyone's business hooktard wrong.

Off to get clearance to do exactly that.

Plus she is just pissy I won't see her due to having small tits and an attraction for drama.

[Danielle Reid]

Originally Posted by bladtinzu

Still with the egotistical slanted view one is heckling you? One has to be of true importance for that to happen. One day you will get there. Till then it was just an idea/question. Wasn't like I was offering 10k a month and screwing up the SB market in the state now was it?

And said thread is still open in public view so take your demands and shove them.

Or have your boy delete it from public view.

For some reason I'm attracted to assholes (I have the mental scars to prove it ) How come we never met?

[urhuckleberry]

A refresher course: Forum guidelines

#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.

Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

#31 - Often times in the hobby arena, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected.


Huck

[bladtinzu]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

A refresher course: Forum guidelines

#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.

Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

#31 - Often times in the hobby arena, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected.


Huck

Need to make sure your boss/girl know this clearly. Unless attacked first I am ok. But when attacked I defend myself.

[bladtinzu]

Originally Posted by MaryBeth

For some reason I'm attracted to assholes (I have the mental scars to prove it ) How come we never met?

Don't know..

[Danielle Reid]

Originally Posted by bladtinzu

Don't know..

Hmm...what a mystery. Unless you're not interested.

[Wakeup]

While you're quoting guidelines huck...

#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

This is the only place in the guidelines that even comes close to mentioning that moderators can lock threads if the OP asks them to...however, this section in no way gives them the right to lock a thread ONLY because the OP asks them to.

Go talk to your buddies in modTARDville before I make an issue out of it for you...

[bladtinzu]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

While you're quoting guidelines huck...

Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

This is the only place in the guidelines that even comes close to mentioning that moderators can lock threads if the OP asks them to...however, this section in no way gives them the right to lock a thread ONLY because the OP asks them to.

Go talk to your buddies in modTARDville before I make an issue out of it for you...

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=888418&page=2

humm... In this case 4 hours was not met. Done in less than 2.

But then again his boss told him to do is so..