Why are URLs being moved to ROS?

[Sir Lancehernot]

There's a field in the open section of the review template for a URL, but I've noticed twice lately that the link has been moved to ROS. Wassup widdat?

Do URLs in non-review public postings require private tags?

If this is routine, seems like y'all could save yourself some work by deleting the URL field from the open section.

[slubby]

Originally Posted by Sir Lancehernot

There's a field in the open section of the review template for a URL, but I've noticed twice lately that the link has been moved to ROS. Wassup widdat?

Do URLs in non-review public postings require private tags?

If this is routine, seems like y'all could save yourself some work by deleting the URL field from the open section.

This is a total guess, so take it with a grain of salt, but...


I believe they are removing URL's from the publicly viewed area and putting them in the ROS "if" they are links to web pages that compete with Eccie.

[Sir Lancehernot]

Nope. A provider's (Bliss) personal website and a Fort Worth studio's (Red Table) website.

[slubby]

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Sorry I wasn't more clear earlier. The Eccie staff only allows URLS (for the publicly viewed area) to show Eccie or P411 links. All other URL's get moved to the ROS.