Should There Be A Hobbyist Review Section?

[jdkees]

Maybe there is and I just don't know it (or have access to it). Personally, I think it would be great to have myself reviewed by the providers I review. Not simply to get a counterpoint on the things I say, but to hopefully get some honest constructive criticism. I'm comfortable enough and confident enough in my own skin that a few criticisms won't kill me, but the right kinds might give me some ideas to work on my game a little.

Don't get me wrong, ladies: it really does give me the warm fuzzies when you say nice things to me in a sesh. And if you're really enjoying yourself at the time, more the better. But take this as an open invite to any provider who ever sees me to give me pointers before, during, or after festivities where you think there's room for improvement. Just don't make me cry... I never bring enough tissues.

Anyone else think this is a good idea? Is this something we could request to test out?

[Chica Chaser]

A lot of fragile male egos would not be able to handle those honest reviews.

[threepeckeredbillygoat]

I would love to see an honest review a lady did on a dude. In full with all the tiny dick and hairy back and saggy balled details about how he can't even eat pussy worth a shit. Bwahaha that would be hilarious.

[jdkees]

I can deal with a review that lets me know I should do a few more sit-ups. It would be totally accurate. It's actually why I'm trying to work out more (so I stop looking like chunk).

[Guest112916]

No.

The day a provider pays me for my time then she can review me. This site is for men to share their experience with others so they can make a well informed choice on who they spend their hard earned money on. We review Hookers. Hookers do not review us except in their own private area where they help each other on who may be a bad apple. So, if she wants to pay me, she can review me.

I charge $300 per hour but I won't fuck you for the hour. For the 1st 20-30 min we will talk and break the ice. No need to tap out in the 1st 5 min. Then we will shower for 15 min, then some foreplay for 10. Now the magic happens. 5 min of mish or K9. I prefer K9 like the other guys because if we don't see your face we can go into another world in our minds and get thru this quickly. If we are lucky I will not cum in 1 min or within 10 strokes and may or may not fake my "O".

See, I'm a bargain. Quality, not quantity. If you write a bad review of me I'll give you a bad reference to all the guys who contact me for a reference.

[jdkees]

Aww, it looks like someone needs a new form to fill out for their reviews.




I've never had that happen to me with a provider here. Maybe you should stay away from BP.

[Gbfsl]

I don't think the majority of hobbiest, myself included, pay a provider to be brutally honest with us about our performance. While in a session, do we want to know what the provider likes and how she likes it....for me, yes. But after a session, do we want to be rated on our actual performance....for me, no.

Most of us pay a lady to give us a GFE or PSE experience with over the top IOP and make us beleive we are the best thing that ever happened to them since sliced bread in our ability to satisfy them sexually. It is a fantasy we are paying for; it is a fantasy world we are playing in; I don't want it ruined by all of a sudden throwing honesty into the picture.

There are many ladies only and other "secret" or "private" forums where providers can talk about us in whatever manner they choose. But don't put it out there for the whole world to see.

I love my fantasy world just the way it is. Do not try to make it real.

:-)

[jdkees]

Well, that seems a much more fair way to put it, Gbfsl. I can understand that.

I don't mind a bit of honesty though. I wonder if I could request a review?

[Reverseheadstock]

I am sure that information is shared in some way or another. Water cooler talk, pm's, emails, those super secret 20 girl sleepovers with pillow fights and lingerie swapping and feathers falling in slow motion... I googled where those are held for years but never found shit.

[Prolongus]

Post #2 pretty much says it all. That and Von's. You pay a girl $300 and she posts shit about your physique, lack sexual attraction, performance issues, etc.? But you did show up on time, lol. Uh...no...not a good idea and a sure client business-killer for the Providers who would (honestly) review us.

There's a thread about this in the National Forum as well; over 60 posts:
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1329681

[Guest110416]

Originally Posted by Von Spieler

No.

The day a provider pays me for my time then she can review me. This site is for men to share their experience with others so they can make a well informed choice on who they spend their hard earned money on. We review Hookers. Hookers do not review us except in their own private area where they help each other on who may be a bad apple. So, if she wants to pay me, she can review me.

I charge $300 per hour but I won't fuck you for the hour. For the 1st 20-30 min we will talk and break the ice. No need to tap out in the 1st 5 min. Then we will shower for 15 min, then some foreplay for 10. Now the magic happens. 5 min of mish or K9. I prefer K9 like the other guys because if we don't see your face we can go into another world in our minds and get thru this quickly. If we are lucky I will not cum in 1 min or within 10 strokes and may or may not fake my "O".

See, I'm a bargain. Quality, not quantity. If you write a bad review of me I'll give you a bad reference to all the guys who contact me for a reference.

Originally Posted by Gbfsl

I don't think the majority of hobbiest, myself included, pay a provider to be brutally honest with us about our performance. While in a session, do we want to know what the provider likes and how she likes it....for me, yes. But after a session, do we want to be rated on our actual performance....for me, no.

Most of us pay a lady to give us a GFE or PSE experience with over the top IOP and make us beleive we are the best thing that ever happened to them since sliced bread in our ability to satisfy them sexually. It is a fantasy we are paying for; it is a fantasy world we are playing in; I don't want it ruined by all of a sudden throwing honesty into the picture.

There are many ladies only and other "secret" or "private" forums where providers can talk about us in whatever manner they choose. But don't put it out there for the whole world to see.

I love my fantasy world just the way it is. Do not try to make it real.

:-)

Those posts are spot on so reviews of hobbyists by providers should never happen (openly).

[Angel Ryder]

No.

[Fawlty]

I think it is a great idea! What better way to get the maket price for providers cut in half for those hoes that can drum up enough business to survive, that is - at least if they tell the truth in the reviews, lol.

[L.A.]

I might have a little dick.
I might be 20 pounds overweight.
I might lay there like a zombie.
I might be balding.

But during my hour I'm the most well endowed, in-shape, best kisser, hairy headed, and best fuck beast on the planet. That's how I should feel when I leave. The truth of me BCD? No thanks.
I see escorts to escape reality....don't need to see it in writing.

I also don't see how writing a review on a client would benefit the escort in any way. If she's honest it will probably kill her business.

[cheatercheater]

No
It probably doesn't matter to her, and certainly not to me, how well or poor I performed. It's all about me in a session and how well she did what she was paid to do. as long as I show up on time, my ass is clean, and I have the donation, she is already happy with me. I don't need her to embellish a review to stroke my ego. In the end, what Von said!

I would get tired of reading the same stuff over and over.
"He's fat but seems to be working on it"
"He has a small to very small dick"
"He licked a long time but I really wasn't into him"
"At least he was on time and had the right donation"


Pay the girl an extra half hour and have her critique you face to face immediately after the session.