Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > Main Discussion Forum - National
test
Main Discussion Forum - National General discussions, but not limited to your local scene. (For staff assistance, contact your local moderator, or see the "Emails to the Staff" post in the Questions for the Staff forum in each city)

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 389
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 273
George Spelvin 258
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70647
biomed162176
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453188
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48290
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41212
CryptKicker37164
Mokoa36490
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2012, 12:56 PM   #1
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default There are Probably Some Prominent People on This List

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49403906...ience_monitor/

Which is why there is so much outrage.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 02:21 PM   #2
NinaBrooke
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 59709
Join Date: Dec 14, 2010
Location: stars
Posts: 3,680
Default

of course.... No one has a problem though with "outing" the ladies name and putting it in press. So why the fuzz??
NinaBrooke is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 04:54 PM   #3
Bobave
Valued Poster
 
Bobave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 16, 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,179
Encounters: 9
Default Don't do the crime if you can't do the time

Wright didn't drag those guys into her place for sex. She's isn't the one who put the wives and children into this awkward spot, the husbands/fathers were. If there's blame, that's where it falls. Bunch of damned pussies wanting to pewl and whine now because they got caught. Here's a quote from one John -

One of the alleged johns, identified as “John Doe 1,” stated in court paperwork that public shaming would ruin his life. “I am a productive member of society, I have children, and my family and reputation will be irreparably harmed if my name is revealed pursuant to the so-called ‘list.’”


What, that didn't occur to him before he dipped his wick? Own it, dipshit. Or don't follow the hobby. It doesn't matter whether the laws are the way they should be, he knew the rules he was playing under. Weak-kneed POS. Wright sure as hell isn't escaping the scarlet letter, why should he?"
Bobave is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 05:47 PM   #4
awl4knot
Valued Poster
 
awl4knot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 24, 2009
Location: South of the Kennebec
Posts: 1,767
Encounters: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninasastri View Post
of course.... No one has a problem though with "outing" the ladies name and putting it in press. So why the fuzz??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobave View Post
Wright didn't drag those guys into her place for sex. She's isn't the one who put the wives and children into this awkward spot, the husbands/fathers were. If there's blame, that's where it falls. Bunch of damned pussies wanting to pewl and whine now because they got caught. Here's a quote from one John -

One of the alleged johns, identified as “John Doe 1,” stated in court paperwork that public shaming would ruin his life. “I am a productive member of society, I have children, and my family and reputation will be irreparably harmed if my name is revealed pursuant to the so-called ‘list.’”


What, that didn't occur to him before he dipped his wick? Own it, dipshit. Or don't follow the hobby. It doesn't matter whether the laws are the way they should be, he knew the rules he was playing under. Weak-kneed POS. Wright sure as hell isn't escaping the scarlet letter, why should he?"
My, my aren't we a callous group of hard-asses? This isn't a matter of "pewling." It's about prosecutorial misconduct. Here's the distinction, and it's a big one. The lady is formally charged and that is a matter of public record. She is presumed innocent and she'll have the right to defend herself in court.

The people who are on the list have not been charged with a crime, so their identities should remain private until either they are charged or they are named as witnesses in a formal pleading of some sort. Even more than the alleged escort, they are presumed to be innocent. There is no justification for the prosecution to "out" them based on some computer list.

And this is what makes it worse. The prosecution can't prove that anyone of the persons on the list engaged in prostitution unless the escort agrees to testify against them, and the prosecutor knows this. Additionally, he/she can't force the "johns" to testify since they have the right to not incriminate themselves by admitting consorting with a prostitute. So the case against her is going no place beyond the police's initial investigation. So naming them is purely a vindictive act that serves no valid prosecutorial purpose. That's why the Maine Supreme Court may grant the petition.
awl4knot is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 07:06 PM   #5
bladtinzu
Valued Poster
 
bladtinzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2012
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,966
Encounters: 29
Default

Anyone taking bets she vanishes before a year's time???
bladtinzu is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 07:28 PM   #6
burkalini
Valued Poster
 
burkalini's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2010
Location: On the planet I think.
Posts: 8,728
Encounters: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobave View Post
Wright didn't drag those guys into her place for sex. She's isn't the one who put the wives and children into this awkward spot, the husbands/fathers were. If there's blame, that's where it falls. Bunch of damned pussies wanting to pewl and whine now because they got caught. Here's a quote from one John -

One of the alleged johns, identified as “John Doe 1,” stated in court paperwork that public shaming would ruin his life. “I am a productive member of society, I have children, and my family and reputation will be irreparably harmed if my name is revealed pursuant to the so-called ‘list.’”


What, that didn't occur to him before he dipped his wick? Own it, dipshit. Or don't follow the hobby. It doesn't matter whether the laws are the way they should be, he knew the rules he was playing under. Weak-kneed POS. Wright sure as hell isn't escaping the scarlet letter, why should he?"

Just to fan the fire a bit I am sure all of this is something you make absolute sure of when you see a provider. I am sure you would never be a pussy like this. Just verified single women only with no SO's. Glass house and all that shit. IJS.
burkalini is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 08:26 PM   #7
gimme_that
Valued Poster
 
gimme_that's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 4,504
Encounters: 9
Default

This should be merged with the too much info to screen thread. The hazards of using your real name.
gimme_that is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 10:52 PM   #8
camouflage
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 17, 2012
Location: Ajman
Posts: 530
Default

How many threads have we all seen here with ladies saying "Oh I never keep client names and/or records of visits"? What a load of crap.

How else would LE acquire the names of all these guys if she didn't keep records?

Clearly she turned over all that info in an effort to save her own ass and get the charges reduced.
camouflage is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 11:17 PM   #9
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

aren't names of the johns already publicly released in other places? not sure about the escorts, but I think they do for the streetwalker busts.

and there's the do-gooder vigilantes who out johns with a cam on a website and report his activities to the police.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 06:27 AM   #10
Jannisary
Valued Poster
 
Jannisary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 17, 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 644
Encounters: 28
Default

From articles I've read it sounds like the police think they have enough evidence to charge the "johns" with patronizing a prostitute. She kept detailed records about the guys and what they did and video recorded at least some of the sessions. The names are going to be "released" when the charges are filed. It doesn't sound like the police are just planning on making the list public, it is when the guys are charged with a crime their name becomes public.
Jannisary is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 07:03 AM   #11
pyramider
El Hombre de la Mancha
 
pyramider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 46,370
Encounters: 10
Default

Most of the guys are probably more worried about the tapes than being arrested. Who would want the world know you are a two pump chump?
pyramider is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 07:26 AM   #12
bladtinzu
Valued Poster
 
bladtinzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2012
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,966
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyramider View Post
Most of the guys are probably more worried about the tapes than being arrested. Who would want the world know you are a two pump chump?

Or take a strap on pounding from behind from some hooktard that keeps records..
bladtinzu is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 07:34 AM   #13
AdventureAdams
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 35460
Join Date: Jul 13, 2010
Location: Houston.
Posts: 2,577
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

I hope she doesn't go the way of the Washington Madam, it way it sucks for everyone involved. It's crazy how the government like to infiltrate the sex lives of our citizens, if there weren't any kids or people working against their will involved then this shouldn't be as big deal as the media makes it out to be.
AdventureAdams is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 03:00 PM   #14
Bobave
Valued Poster
 
Bobave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 16, 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,179
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burkalini View Post
Just to fan the fire a bit I am sure all of this is something you make absolute sure of when you see a provider. I am sure you would never be a pussy like this. Just verified single women only with no SO's. Glass house and all that shit. IJS.
No glass house here, asshole. If I get caught, I get caught. Yep, that includes my family knowing. We all know the risks. If we aren't willing to own it we shouldn't be playing.
Bobave is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 03:59 PM   #15
bladtinzu
Valued Poster
 
bladtinzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2012
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,966
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burkalini View Post
Just to fan the fire a bit I am sure all of this is something you make absolute sure of when you see a provider. I am sure you would never be a pussy like this. Just verified single women only with no SO's. Glass house and all that shit. IJS.

And to quote Dr. Dre from 1992... "Bitches ain't nothing but hoes and tricks"..
bladtinzu is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved