Is Warren running out of funding?

[Unique_Carpenter]

Warren's fundraising noticeably down.
So how can she convince capitalists that they should support socialism?
Good luck with that.
The Dims chewing each other up is highly entertaining.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eli...ly-fundraising

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Warren's fundraising noticeably down.
So how can she convince capitalists that they should support socialism?
Good luck with that.
The Dims chewing each other up is highly entertaining.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eli...ly-fundraising

I love watching the fundraising bounce around between the Candidates. They will all be broke before the end of the primaries, while the Republican war chest grows in record numbers.

I think Warren could be done.

[oeb11]

Lizzie is campaigning on destroying capitalist corporations, yet demands campaign donations to support her socialism.

Corporate DPST donors are waking up to the fallacy of supporting Those who wish to destroy them.

Kind of a shame - the DPST's need to nominate a flaming Socialist like Bernie or Lizzie to get their tail handed to them resoundingly.

The lesson has been applied in previous elections - but the Dims just don't learn.

Their idiotology religiosity prevents any deviation from their DPST narrative.

Marxism -Leninism good= Capitalism bad.

It is their basis of their beliefs.

[bambino]

She better start contacting some billionaires. Maybe some Indian casinos.

[Unique_Carpenter]

As mentioned above, the dims fundraising is lacking.
Yes, spending it bashing each other.
Sadly entertaining.
And yup, not much left to go 1 on 1 in the finals.

[WTF]

The hate for Trump will drive the lefties to the polls like they were handing out free phones!

You boys sound like the Dems in 2015...rather cocky.

[Chung Tran]

of course, none of you that sport a broad smile at Warren's fundraising difficulty, would support public funding of elections. you are not about to give up that huge built-in advantage you have, slashing Corporate tax rates in return for major funding in your (Republican) campaigns.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by oeb11

Lizzie is campaigning on destroying capitalist corporations, yet demands campaign donations to support her socialism.

Corporate DPST donors are waking up to the fallacy of supporting Those who wish to destroy them.

Kind of a shame - the DPST's need to nominate a flaming Socialist like Bernie or Lizzie to get their tail handed to them resoundingly.

The lesson has been applied in previous elections - but the Dims just don't learn.

Their idiotology religiosity prevents any deviation from their DPST narrative.

Marxism -Leninism good= Capitalism bad.

It is their basis of their beliefs.

What a great business plan.....
Warren to rich contributors...”support me and I will tax you out of existence”
Rich contributors to Warren....”we would rather go with mayor Butt Plug”.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

of course, none of you that sport a broad smile at Warren's fundraising difficulty, would support public funding of elections. you are not about to give up that huge built-in advantage you have, slashing Corporate tax rates in return for major funding in your (Republican) campaigns.

Lots of rich liberals out there to counteract the current Republican advantage.

What good is earning money for a guy like Craig Hall if he can't buy his wife an Ambassadorship when Democrats are back in office?

Unfortunately for my wife, I can only afford to buy her an Ambassadorship to some shithole country she wouldn't want to go visit, let alone live there.

[oeb11]

CT - you are projecting and pretending to read the mind of others - characteristic of smug, supercilious DPST's!!!


I am sick and tired of continuous political campaigning - non-stop - the moment an election is over the campaigning starts for the next two years.



I am all in favor of limiting the campaign cycle, and funding federal political elections with a given amount for each candidate for Senate, house, POTUS and VP,
Unfortunately, as i remember, the Supreme Court declared campaign contributions free speech and such a scheme - which would limit a great deal of corruption from campaign ocntributions - legal or not- is unfeasible.

CT - why not start a thread and toss it out for constructive debate - rather than go the YR-HH and others route of name-calling and projection on the opinions of others. ?????


Of course, .....

[Chung Tran]

I don't place you in the group I labeled, who do not want public funding. you are not rich or far-right enough

I will start a thread if one of the REAL right-wing nut jobs posts that he is FOR public funding. I don't expect to have to exercise my fingers

[oeb11]

Thank you - CT
Still - the suggestion to start a thread stands.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by bambino

She better start contacting some billionaires. Maybe some Indian casinos.

Chief Needum Wampum.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by WTF

The hate for Trump will drive the lefties to the polls like they were handing out free phones!

You boys sound like the Dems in 2015...rather cocky.

Like the left is packing them in at ALL these rallies and the vast interest in the lame debates...GOTCHA!!
Trumps crowds are no fluke.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by WTF

The hate for Trump will drive the lefties to the polls like they were handing out free phones!

You boys sound like the Dems in 2015...rather cocky.

I think you raise legitimate concerns here. We do not need to get cocky and I wouldn't even say we are even in the lead - this election momentum could change at any moment.

The liberals are praying and hoping for an economic crash and millions of people thrown out of work and huge stock market losses and business failures so they can win the election. Bastards!