ROS comments: A bother or embarrassment for anyone?

[Sir Lancehernot]

This is sort of related to Dannie's query here: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=717983

For purposes of this discussion, we can generally dispense with the idea that our ROS comments in reviews remain just between the guys, and that any woman who wants to see what's written about her can do so, through at least two ways that I can think of, maybe more.

And even those ladies who choose not to go there must have some idea of the kind of details and writing style that show up in our (fictitious) reviews.

So I'm kind of curious what a lady thinks when she reads the ROS comments, or uses her imagination to guess what they might be, and comes up with graphic descriptions of how great a cocksucker she is (or is not), how tight her pussy and/or asshole is (or is not), how vocal she is, how she swallowed with a smile (or didn't), how she looked like a glazed donut afterwards, how much of an absolute slut she was BCD, etc.

I've been hobbying for more than 15 years and have watched (and, before that, read) more porn than I will ever admit to, and even I will have to admit that I'd probably blush a little if I knew I was being discussed in such terms. OTOH, I tend to get a little carried away when I review a good encounter, and I tend to describe them in terms that I'd never use to her face, and if it weren't for the illusion that ROS was private.

Does it in any way bother any of our lady friends? Guys, particularly if you enjoyed the session and the lady, do you have qualms about characterizing your activities as if you were bragging in a locker room?

[TinMan]

You do realize that by answering this question honestly, the ladies have to admit to breaking rules and subjecting themselves to possible sanctions?

From the guy's perspective, what the hell is there to brag about? The fact that I earn enough to pay for sex? We call it Illusion of Passion for a reason, y'know.

[Tiger Woods]

The ROS is all fiction. If you guys think anyone believes that you can go multiple rounds non-stop like a porn star you are delusional. Most of you pop as soon as she touches your dick but that would read poorly. I read ROS as an advertising favor so you can get special treatment on your next visit.

[Sir Lancehernot]

While I can understand penalties for actively soliciting ROS information from a member, when such information either is sent to a lady unsolicited, or is available freely elsewhere, I wouldn't have thought that penalties would attach. If that's the case, I was unaware of it.

If so, we can move the discussion to the purely hypothetical. Let's assume that detailed review information is available publicly on another site, written by a client who's not a member here. Or that a member of an e-mail group shared another member's review with her, neither one of them being members here.

The question is more "do your ears burn when you read or hear such things." It's not a "gotcha" question, nor is it concerned with the medium in which the information was conveyed.

[Tiger Woods]

It doesn't bother the providers, it's what they do.

Here's an example, recently a body rub girl was reviewed here and all the candid details were written out in the review. She acted as though she was horrified by the review and protested that the info was public....topless, L1, et al. She was concerned the review could be seen by people who may know her. Instead of going UTR, she was still advertising on BP the next day. Go figure.

A local LMT has been outed as being a past porn star, her reaction is it will get her more business.

They do it because they need the money, no other reason. Are they bothered by it? No.

[Prolongus]

I've never had a girl get upset about anything I've said in ROS. Things that I've said, like she's tight, blows great, doesn't spill a drop, calling her a Hose Monster, Punch Board, fuckbunny...just a few things off the top of my head...

I'm thinking as raw and tasteless some comments may seem, the girls may look at them as positives for business.

Where else can you say "Get over here, ya little Hose Monster!" and have the girl giggle?

[steviewinwood]

Who cares?

[samantha thom]

I don't like being reviewed and being described in such terms. I state this on my showcase too. When I first started, a few gentlemen proudly and voluntarily forwarded me what they wrote and I was shocked and embarassed about how the experience and my body and looks were described. It bothered me. Now I do not need any more reviews so I prefer to not be reviewed unless the client is not satisfied with me...then he will have every right to write negative review.
Also, there were a few incidents that the guy got carried away that my personal info were shared in ROS (job and family info). I knew this because the guy voluntarily e-mailed me his review of me. I was mad and asked the mods to delete.
In conclusion, no, I do not care to or like to read my reviews nor being reviewed.

[guest043013-2]

I once was working on a review of a certain provider who had RMT status as well. I tried to not be to explicit in my review, since she was an RMT. I sent it to her prior to posting it to make sure she was okay with it considering her status. She complained it was not explicit enough, the guys would be bored by it.

Go figure.