Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60894
gman4453291
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48644
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42553
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36974
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2024, 10:26 AM   #1
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default Labor Department Revises the Biden/Harris Job Numbers……..Down!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksa...vernment-says/

One of the Kamala Harris talking points, (ie, lies), is the touting of “job Growth”.

Well, it seems the big lie is now being turned around, by over 800,000 jobs.

The Swamp is trying its best to make Harris/Biden look good, but it is like pouring perfume on a pig. Sooner or later the truth will come out.

Of course, this is just another big lie being perpetrated by Kamala as she tries to rebrand. Lie after lie after lie. She is beginning to make Joe abide n look like an amateur

How does she keep track.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 11:03 AM   #2
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksa...vernment-says/

One of the Kamala Harris talking points, (ie, lies), is the touting of “job Growth”.

Well, it seems the big lie is now being turned around, by over 800,000 jobs.

The Swamp is trying its best to make Harris/Biden look good, but it is like pouring perfume on a pig. Sooner or later the truth will come out.

Of course, this is just another big lie being perpetrated by Kamala as she tries to rebrand. Lie after lie after lie. She is beginning to make Joe abide n look like an amateur

How does she keep track.
Quite a bit of an exaggeration here. The Bureau of Labor Statistics which compiles these figures regularly revises their numbers. No one here is deliberately lying to anyone.

Are the BLS Employment Numbers Right?
https://trerc.tamu.edu/blog/are-the-...numbers-right/

“While the payroll estimate is the most comprehensive and most precise employment measure we have, we should be aware that the headline number almost always changes. At best, the latest estimate is still a look in the rearview mirror.”
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 09:25 PM   #3
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,053
Default

... So the revision is 800,000 jobs LESS? ... ...

Crikey! ... I'd also say that's quite a BAD exaggeration.
By those who claimed all the "job growth"...

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 10:05 PM   #4
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... So the revision is 800,000 jobs LESS? ... ...

Crikey! ... I'd also say that's quite a BAD exaggeration.
By those who claimed all the "job growth"...

#### Salty
Got a problem with the numbers then talk to the Bureau of Labor Statistics which compiles the data. If you are going to criticize the process maybe you should try learning how the system works first.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 04:56 AM   #5
Unique_Carpenter
Chasing a Cowgirl
 
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 19, 2013
Location: West Kansas
Posts: 31,405
Encounters: 89
Default

Unique_Carpenter is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 07:37 AM   #6
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,146
Encounters: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Got a problem with the numbers then talk to the Bureau of Labor Statistics which compiles the data. If you are going to criticize the process maybe you should try learning how the system works first.
Most years revisions are 100,000 to 200,000 jobs plus or minus This is the largest revision in I think they said 30 years, might only be 20. So either intentional lie or gross incompetence. Either way they should be fired.
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 08:00 AM   #7
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmstud60 View Post
Most years revisions are 100,000 to 200,000 jobs plus or minus This is the largest revision in I think they said 30 years, might only be 20. So either intentional lie or gross incompetence. Either way they should be fired.
Try reading: MIXED STORY: WHAT THE REVISION TO THE JOBS DATA MEANS
https://cepr.net/mixed-story-what-th...bs-data-means/

It makes a compelling argument for bad data rather than bad intentions.
The BLS is a professional organization. I have serious doubts about intentional lying or gross incompetence.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 11:23 AM   #8
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,146
Encounters: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Try reading: MIXED STORY: WHAT THE REVISION TO THE JOBS DATA MEANS
https://cepr.net/mixed-story-what-th...bs-data-means/

It makes a compelling argument for bad data rather than bad intentions.
The BLS is a professional organization. I have serious doubts about intentional lying or gross incompetence.

looks like Marxist economist at a quick glance
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 12:17 PM   #9
TechPapi
BANNED
 
TechPapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 6, 2010
Location: Rent free in someone's head
Posts: 771
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmstud60 View Post
looks like Marxist economist at a quick glance

"quick glance"...MARXISM.

Would you mind taking a moment to point out the Marxism you gleaned from that glance of yours?


Note: A quick search shows that you (farmstud) have used the term "marxism or marxist nearly 60 times in the recent past. If I expanded that search to include socialism and communism it would likely comprise about 80% of your recent replies. Clearly that's your goto for anything now.


TechPapi is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 02:27 PM   #10
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,146
Encounters: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TechPapi View Post
"quick glance"...MARXISM.

Would you mind taking a moment to point out the Marxism you gleaned from that glance of yours?


Note: A quick search shows that you (farmstud) have used the term "marxism or marxist nearly 60 times in the recent past. If I expanded that search to include socialism and communism it would likely comprise about 80% of your recent replies. Clearly that's your goto for anything now.



LOL, well, what I said is the truth.
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 05:48 PM   #11
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TechPapi View Post
"quick glance"...MARXISM.

Would you mind taking a moment to point out the Marxism you gleaned from that glance of yours?


Note: A quick search shows that you (farmstud) have used the term "marxism or marxist nearly 60 times in the recent past. If I expanded that search to include socialism and communism it would likely comprise about 80% of your recent replies. Clearly that's your goto for anything now.


... How does this address the thread topic??

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 05:53 PM   #12
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Try reading: MIXED STORY: WHAT THE REVISION TO THE JOBS DATA MEANS
https://cepr.net/mixed-story-what-th...bs-data-means/

It makes a compelling argument for bad data rather than bad intentions.
The BLS is a professional organization. I have serious doubts about intentional lying or gross incompetence.
... Try Reading the posts here of Farmstud and Jackie.

... They make a compelling argument for BOTH outright lying
AND gross incompetence. ... Just sayin'

... Hmmmm... Please explain what "Intentional Lying" is.
Is that more or less worse than just plain Lying??

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 09:01 PM   #13
biomed1
Administrator
 
biomed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 63,220
Encounters: 32
Default Members Are Encouraged . . .

To Return To And Remain On The Original Topic . . .
Quote:
#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
biomed1 is offline   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 09:46 PM   #14
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... Try Reading the posts here of Farmstud and Jackie.

... They make a compelling argument for BOTH outright lying
AND gross incompetence. ... Just sayin'

... Hmmmm... Please explain what "Intentional Lying" is.
Is that more or less worse than just plain Lying??

#### Salty
Salty, The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses data provided to it by companies that file surveys of hiring firing and retention employment data. That data can be wrong but it’s still used anyway.

The staff of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is a professional outfit that does exactly what we want it to do. They produce the data about the economy as best they can in a completely objective way. And they use methods that are completely transparent.

This is what I mean by intentionally lying or misleading. If there is a discrepancy in the numbers it’s not because they are lying, misleading, or incompetent. It means that something in the data they are getting is throwing off the results. Maybe we need to let them correct it rather than assuming that it is some kind of liberal conspiracy or government dysfunction.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 09:51 PM   #15
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,053
Default

... As usual, that's a fair-minded view from you, mate.
And you'd surely 'ave a point IF maybe the revision by
the labour people was 60 or 70 thousand.

... But 800,000 is no doubt waaaay beyonde any reasonable or
rational numbers count to be off-by.

... Which is why I do agree with Jackie and Farmstud here.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved