ECCIE change on age for Verified Provider status

[Fancyinheels]

Just noticed a change for VP status, one of the things ECCIE may be doing in preparation of SESTA/FOSTA being signed into law.

Providers now have to be 21, not 18 as was the case up to just a few days ago. Here's the new deal:

Verified Provider Process for ECCIE - (Ladies please read) Ladies, you may post a weekly ad in this section once you have been upgraded to Verified Provider.

Submit your info to the staff at Houston@eccie.net

1. website address (your website or advertising site)
2. referral from another provider or hobbyist
3. links to reviews from recognized members (any site)

Any combination of the above requirements which will sufficiently establish you as a legit provider will be accepted.

In addition, you must submit proof to eccievp.verify@gmail.com that you are 21 or over to become a Verified Provider on Eccie. We require a photocopy of your Drivers License and/or state issued ID and your location. Your real name and address should be hidden, but your birth date and photo must be visible, along with your user name. We also need a close up picture of your face with you holding up the license or ID next to your face. Proof of age WILL be requested of ANYONE seeking VP status, regardless of their stated age. Please submit your information separately from the info you sent to your local staff for verification.

The verification process could take 72 hours.

Explains why some established young providers now have "age verification pending" on their avatars, and their Showcases are suddenly missing in action. We had quite a few who professed to be 18.

However, I am wondering WHY this change was made. To give more credence to this site as not being involved in the trafficking of minors? But I thought the legal age for pretty much every consent short of drinking Jameson in this country was 18?

Hmmm, just hit Google, and evidently a gal can't be a stripper in some states until she turns 21, depending on the type of establishment and the liquor license. Didn't know that before. Precedent?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

But I thought the legal age for pretty much every consent short of drinking Jameson in this country was 18?

Hmmm, just hit Google, and evidently a gal can't be a stripper in some states until she turns 21, depending on the type of establishment and the liquor license. Didn't know that before. Precedent?

The house makes it's own rules. And if you don't like it, . . .

[shinepro]

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Just noticed a change for VP status, one of the things ECCIE may be doing in preparation of SESTA/FOSTA being signed into law.

Providers now have to be 21, not 18 as was the case up to just a few days ago. Here's the new deal:

Verified Provider Process for ECCIE - (Ladies please read) Ladies, you may post a weekly ad in this section once you have been upgraded to Verified Provider.

Submit your info to the staff at Houston@eccie.net

1. website address (your website or advertising site)
2. referral from another provider or hobbyist
3. links to reviews from recognized members (any site)

Any combination of the above requirements which will sufficiently establish you as a legit provider will be accepted.

In addition, you must submit proof to eccievp.verify@gmail.com that you are 21 or over to become a Verified Provider on Eccie. We require a photocopy of your Drivers License and/or state issued ID and your location. Your real name and address should be hidden, but your birth date and photo must be visible, along with your user name. We also need a close up picture of your face with you holding up the license or ID next to your face. Proof of age WILL be requested of ANYONE seeking VP status, regardless of their stated age. Please submit your information separately from the info you sent to your local staff for verification.

The verification process could take 72 hours.

Explains why some established young providers now have "age verification pending" on their avatars, and their Showcases are suddenly missing in action. We had quite a few who professed to be 18.

However, I am wondering WHY this change was made. To give more credence to this site as not being involved in the trafficking of minors? But I thought the legal age for pretty much every consent short of drinking Jameson in this country was 18?

Hmmm, just hit Google, and evidently a gal can't be a stripper in some states until she turns 21, depending on the type of establishment and the liquor license. Didn't know that before. Precedent?

They are foooking doing what I guess everyone else, freaking out. I guess they feel safer saying 21. I don't get it. I was buying snapper with a beeper and a little knowledge. I really don't get the hysteria, but hey shine ain't very smard...

[shinepro]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

The house makes it's own rules. And if you don't like it, . . .

Oh foook, here comes da foooking peanud gallery WID his 4 cents. Where is my foooking Hennessy at....

[eccieuser9500]

Quoting the whole damn post?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by shinepro

but hey shine ain't very smard...

[NordicJag]

Originally Posted by shinepro

but hey shine ain't very smard...

BS

[shinepro]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Hey ecco uso, da foooking great shine haz a lot of supporters. You need a plate of oxtails, some Hennessy and a blak booty WID a fat ass. Too tense. Hey fanso red, great thoughtful post. Always classy boo boo.

[Fancyinheels]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

The house makes it's own rules. And if you don't like it, . . .

Too true. I didn't say I didn't like it. Haven't made up my mind yet, but totally immaterial as, yes, I'm just another peasant in the ECCIE village.

However, since there didn't seem to be any public admin announcement, I wanted to publicize the switch-up.

How necessary it was or effective it may be as a form of site protection remains to be seen. By regulation, stars in the porn industry only have to be 18, so 21 here seems arbitrary, but I understand the possible motivation. (Hmmm, will commercial pornography sites have to alter their ways like escort boards, I wonder? Both have denizens doing the deed for dinero. Always wondered why THAT was legal when prostitution wasn't?)

I feel bad for those young lassies already verified and established but who don't now meet the modified bar, as they have lost the ability to promote themselves as providers on the board. I believe that's called "collateral damage."

[eccieuser9500]

But then there's the notorious list.

[shinepro]

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Too true. I didn't say I didn't like it. Haven't made up my mind yet, but totally immaterial as, yes, I'm just another peasant in the ECCIE village.

However, since there didn't seem to be any public admin announcement, I wanted to publicize the switch-up.

How necessary it was or effective it may be as a form of site protection remains to be seen. By regulation, stars in the porn industry only have to be 18, so 21 here seems arbitrary, but I understand the possible motivation. (Hmmm, will commercial pornography sites have to alter their ways like escort boards, I wonder? Both have denizens doing the deed for dinero. Always wondered why THAT was legal when prostitution wasn't?)

I feel bad for those young lassies already verified and established who have now lost the ability to promote themselves as providers on the board. I believe that's called "collateral damage."

Fanso red I honestly think it's in der foooking best interest. Dis thang of ours fanso red is foooking treacherous. Like Yung tenderoni go to school, or try, work at Walmart, be broke but leave this shidd alone. It swallows the best of young 18 year old girls. I've seen it first hand red. It ain't pretty. Most are not mentally strong enough to handle dis shit and Shine wants da best for da ladies!

[threshold]

The No Girl under 21 rule just took effect...... Sad but true but i see why eccie did it.


There go all the 18 year old hotties....... But where there's a will.... there's a way..... Just have to know where to look.








...........

[Jarh3ad]

Damn. I was going to hit up Caseykk next on my TDL. Her profile / showcase is gone.

NOOOOOOoooo!!!

[Fancyinheels]

Originally Posted by threshold

The No Girl under 21 rule just took effect...... Sad but true but i see why eccie did it.


There go all the 18 year old hotties....... But where there's a will.... there's a way..... Just have to know where to look.

...........

Yes, many fellows will be disappointed that they have to search elsewhere for just-blossoming beauties.

I wonder what other adjustments are in store for ECCIE? And why admin seems so steadfastly silent on the many concerns raised by members? I realize that they are likely busy as bees behind closed doors prepping for the future, but with numerous threads now discussing SESTA/FOSTA spread throughout the board and obvious procedural changes being quietly implemented, wouldn't some statement by staff to reassure the populace be appropriate even before Trump signs the legislation into law?

Originally Posted by Jarh3ad

Damn. I was going to hit up Caseykk next on my TDL. Her profile / showcase is gone.

NOOOOOOoooo!!!

Yep, she was the first young verified provider whose Showcase I noticed had vanished, which led me to the new age restriction. Such a shame, as CaseyKK was gorgeous!

Similar thread in Main Discussion Forum - National: https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2353088

[shinepro]

I'm personally WID da powers to be not saying shit. I wouldn't either, I would let you'll speculate and say absolutely nothing. Why? They got the best game in town, why address this shit in any way. Where are we going? We are here and the girls are here until this shit implodes so what statement could they make to make this shit any better and be in their best interest. My opinion.