Legalization...

[no_romance_needed]

Curious as to how people here feel about the legalization of this 'hobby'? I would assume most people here are all for it, but maybe not?

[Guest070818-1]

No, no, NO!

Decriminalization is the word.

When things get legalized, they get taxed.

[dodger]

Originally Posted by Adrienne Baptiste

No, no, NO!

Decriminalization is the word.

When things get legalized, they get taxed.

wow ... well ... here is to contributing your fair share to my social security check

[Iaintliein]

Originally Posted by Adrienne Baptiste

No, no, NO!

Decriminalization is the word.

When things get legalized, they get taxed.

URL=http://s220.photobucket.com/user/iaintliein/media/Bingo-trollface.jpg.html]

[Iaintliein]

Originally Posted by dodger

wow ... well ... here is to contributing your fair share to my social security check

Businesses don't pay taxes, only their customers do.

[guest071618-1]

All 4 it...
why paid sex be illegal?
Guys go on date to get pussy... We spend more money on dates before getting pussy...
Both are same, just one go through process and time,,, other get right to it...
Make it legal,, I have no problem paying tax..

I guess AB like idea of charge clients tax then not pay tax.

[APerfectCircle]

Definitely legalize what happens between consenting adults. Then we should spend those resources to catch the bastards that engage in human trafficking and that turn out kids.

[TexTushHog]

Originally Posted by Iaintliein

Businesses don't pay taxes, only their customers do.

That's not true. The percentage of any additional tax borne by each depends on the elasticity of demand of the good or service.

[wellendowed1911]

Originally Posted by tonyromorocks

Definitely legalize what happens between consenting adults. Then we should spend those resources to catch the bastards that engage in human trafficking and that turn out kids.

I agree if you take out the pimps/trafficking/under age and it becomes an agreement between 2 consenting adults -problem solved. Whether people want to believe it or not, men who are in relationships are indirectly paying for pussy in one way or another.

[Guest110416]

Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

I agree if you take out the pimps/trafficking/under age and it becomes an agreement between 2 consenting adults -problem solved. Whether people want to believe it or not, men who are in relationships are indirectly paying for pussy in one way or another.

Exactly.

The unfortunate thing is, when you hobby and have an SO, you are paying for it twice. Which stands to reason, since most of the time, you have drama and YMMV especially BCD with your SO, when you pay a provider, well, my signature says it all.

[wellendowed1911]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

Exactly.

The unfortunate thing is, when you hobby and have an SO, you are paying for it twice. Which stands to reason, since most of the time, you have drama and YMMV especially BCD with your SO, when you pay a provider, well, my signature says it all.

Yes, your sig is on point- I have friends- mostly who are either married or in relationships say:" oh hell no- I would never pay for pussy-I already get pussy for free now...."

Oh they are so wrong- true every time they have sex with their girlfriend/wife they are not shelling out cash right before or after they have sex, but I know these guys- they pay some of their ladies bills/ they take them shopping, pay for their manicure/pedicure/massages /dining/then they go to concerts -they(the men) are paying for the tickets, food at the concession stands/parking etc... So in the long room they are truly paying for the pussy they just don't realize it!

Heck I hate a date last night with a lady in the RW- went to a comedy concert in Addison- tickets combined were $70- valet parking $10- $25 spent on drinks at the venue- after the show she was hungry- went to eat- that bill was 75 combined- we went back to my place and did our thing- and she's not a provider so obviously no money was exchange- so in reality can I really say I fucked her for free? Heck no, 180 was spent before any clothes came off.

[DarkeyKong]

It's usually ONLY about sex with a provider. But with an SO it's about far more than "just sex". Therefore, the comparison doesn't really stand. If you do only choose to compare the two based on sex, then yes the provider is infinitely of more value. But usually, with an SO, that's never the case.

[Nina the Dicknapper]

Originally Posted by eng

All 4 it...
why paid sex be illegal?
Guys go on date to get pussy... We spend more money on dates before getting pussy...
Both are same, just one go through process and time,,, other get right to it...
Make it legal,, I have no problem paying tax..

I guess AB like idea of charge clients tax then not pay tax.

+1

[Fort Worth Punk]

Originally Posted by TexTushHog

That's not true. The percentage of any additional tax borne by each depends on the elasticity of demand of the good or service.

Ultimately, however, a business which is not passing on taxes to their customers cannot stay in business. That would mean they are operating at a negative cash flow, and that cannot be maintained indefinitely.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Fort Worth Punk

Ultimately, however, a business which is not passing on taxes to their customers cannot stay in business. That would mean they are operating at a negative cash flow, and that cannot be maintained indefinitely.

You are not considering that they are just making less of a profit, and therefore take home less for themselves.

The best way to handle it would be to price government services at cost plus 20 percent when possible...and drastically cut military spending.