Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The Sandbox - Upstate New YorkThe Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here
....on how long it takes a court to nullify Kathy's new law that says it is automatically illegal to carry a firearm into a private business unless they post a sign explicitly giving permission?
Clarence tried to warn her in advance in the majority opinion.
First he spoke of it being permissible to regulate carry in "sensitive places" such as "legislative assemblies, polling places, and courthouses." He then went on to say that "...courts can use analogies to those historical regulations of “sensitive places” to determine that modern regulations prohibiting the carry of firearms in new and analogous sensitive places are constitutionally permissible." But then he cautions that this definition cannot be expanded too "broadly."
This woman is an idiot that obviously hates gun-owners more than the Cuomos. But outlawing CCW in all private businesses that do not post notice specifically permitting it is so overly broad that I cannot believe that it will survive anything but the first level or so of a simple court challenge.
Some analysts are already saying that there are very few restrictions of this type that will have any hope of withstanding legal challenge. But this one, in particular, has got to go. Hochul needs an immediate lesson in exactly what this ruling means. And what is does NOT mean, i.e. she is not free to just come up with a whole different set of ways to circumvent the 2nd Amendment.
This could be a lot of fun, watchin her get slapped....
Yeah. Imagine shopping at....oh...maybe some place like Tops. And like the good law-abiding cuck that Kathy wants you to be, you leave yer piece at home. And THEN.....
but it will take 6 yrs to make a ruling in the top court....
Nah. I mean...you could be right. No guarantees. But I think much more likely is that a Federal judge completely shits on it, and soon. Even if not, SCOTUS can just vacate a lower court ruling and be done with this bullshit. This does not have to start all over.
Nah. I mean...you could be right. No guarantees. But I think much more likely is that a Federal judge completely shits on it, and soon. Even if not, SCOTUS can just vacate a lower court ruling and be done with this bullshit. This does not have to start all over.
....on how long it takes a court to nullify Kathy's new law that says it is automatically illegal to carry a firearm into a private business unless they post a sign explicitly giving permission?
Clarence tried to warn her in advance in the majority opinion.
I bet you wouldn't care about the "over/under" if one of your family members had his or her face blown off by a gun and you had to give a DNA sample in order to positively ID the dead body.
What's the over/under that Clarence is morally (and possibly illegally) corrupt and is using his position on the bench in order to better serve his wife.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GadgetGuy
Jokacz, why are you here?
The OP started a thread a while back saying he was supposedly moving away and wouldn't "bother" us anymore. That question is better asked of him.
I bet you wouldn't care about the "over/under" if one of your family members had his or her face blown off by a gun and you had to give a DNA sample in order to positively ID the dead body.
What's the over/under that Clarence is morally (and possibly illegally) corrupt and is using his position on the bench in order to better serve his wife.
The OP started a thread a while back saying he was supposedly moving away and wouldn't "bother" us anymore. That question is better asked of him.
what's the numbers legal vs illegal gun murders ????
moved.. who knows or cares. Not "bother" mmmm ahhhh thanks Op Sir
What's the over/under....
