DUMB DIMOCRATS DON'T REALIZE THAT OBAMA WILL BE FUCKING THE BLUE STATES WORSE...AND THE MIDDLE CLASS IN THOSE BLUE STATES ARE GOING TO BE FUCKED THE HARDEST....

[Whirlaway]

It is sad that the blue states have so many "low information" voters that they re-elected Obama.


T’S TIME TO STICK IT TO THE BLUE STATES

POSTED ON DECEMBER 7, 2012 BY JOHN HINDERAKER
www.Powerlineblog.com


After years of campaigning for higher taxes, it is beginning to dawn on liberal residents of blue states that the effects, for them, will not be pretty. Most of the nation’s “rich”–those earning over $250,000 a year, or, depending on President Obama’s mood, $175,000–live in the blue states. Moreover, the deductions that are likely slated for reduction or elimination, including state taxes and home mortgages, mostly benefit blue state residents. So the New York Times, a prime agitator for higher taxes, appears to be having second thoughts:

As they continue to wrangle over the year-end fiscal deadline, both Democrats and Republicans are considering caps on federal income-tax deductions.

That could be very bad news for residents of New York, New Jersey and other states and cities that rely heavily on their own income taxes. Such a cap would reduce the value of the deduction for state and local income taxes, which has been part of the federal tax code for a century (though the deduction has been diluted by the alternative minimum tax). That could substantially reduce middle-class disposable incomes in high-tax states, which, in turn, would put pressure on those states to cut taxes and the services they have long chosen to provide.

The Times doesn’t disguise the ideological basis for its sudden enthusiasm for tax preferences:

Over time, the deduction has become the equivalent of a subsidy from the federal government to states that believe in a strong and active government. That may infuriate conservatives in low-tax states like Texas, who hate subsidizing states with different views of government’s role, but it’s actually a good thing for the country.

Sure it is. But, hey, if you’re going to raise taxes on “the rich,” something’s gotta give. A lot of conservatives are now saying, let the stuck pig squeal, and let’s stick it to blue state liberals, good and hard. Who knows, maybe before long the Times will figure out that the “rich” disproportionately constitute its readers. Raising their taxes will reduce the discretionary income they have to spend on items like newspapers. It’s just another illustration of the adage that every cloud has a silver lining.

[Yssup Rider]

Powerline blog.

LMAO!

Whirlyturd, is there a right wing blogger who doesn't speak the truth?

[Whirlaway]

The powerline article was about a story in the NEW YORK TIMES dummy......................... .


But again, you show you are not up to the intellectual challenge of a debate on ideas and substance, just your typical vacant response.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Powerline blog.

LMAO!

Whirlyturd, is there a right wing blogger who doesn't speak the truth?

[Whirlaway]

OK; you don't like Powerline....here is the same analysis from Forbes...........

The Blue-State Suicide Pact: States Whose Citizens Stand To Lose The Most

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotk...-suicide-pact/

[Whirlaway]

From the Forbes story....

Ironically the new taxes will have relatively little effect on the detested Romney uber-class, who derive most of their income from capital gains, taxed at a much lower rate. They also have access to all manner of offshore dodges. Nor will it have much impact on Silicon Valley millionaires and billionaires, or the Hollywood moguls and urban land speculators who constitute the Democratic Party’s “good rich,” and enjoy many of the same privileges as their wealthy conservative counterparts.

The people whose wallets will be drained in the new war on “the rich” are high-earning, but hardly plutocratic professionals like engineers, doctors, lawyers, small business owners and the like. Once seen as the bastion of the middle class, and exemplars of upward mobility, these people are emerging as the modern day “kulaks,” the affluent peasants ruthlessly targeted by Stalin in the early 1930s.

[Yssup Rider]

well then you're safe.

Why don't you simply quote the original story from now on? Unless there's something you don't like about the story. I'd investigate, but I just washed my hair...

snick

[Randy4Candy]

OK, you band of whining, loser "geniuses," tell me again how paying a 4% higher tax rate on earnings ABOVE $250K (up to $249.99999999K still gets taxed at the Bush rate) is a "fucking?" Granted, it may not be on anyone's Top 10 Christmas list, but.....

Of course, we COULD go into reading for comprehension, but you Wingtards would have to read AND comprehend it - the usual Catch-22 when dealing with the mentally infirm.

[i'va biggen]

Obie wants to raise taxes on the 2% Romney would have raised it on the 47%

[Guest040616]

I see that Whirly has predicted a new "trending" line to amuse us!

Thanks Whirly, life would be boring without your entertainment!

[Whirlaway]

You obviously didn't read the analysis................Tell it to Governor Brown; you liberal retards think raising taxes will have no consequences on government services, safety nets, etc.....

DESPITE TAX INCREASE, CALIFORNIA STATE REVENUES IN FREEFALL

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...-OFF-THE-CLIFF

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

OK, you band of whining, loser "geniuses," tell me again how paying a 4% higher tax rate on earnings ABOVE $250K (up to $249.99999999K still gets taxed at the Bush rate) is a "fucking?" Granted, it may not be on anyone's Top 10 Christmas list, but.....

Of course, we COULD go into reading for comprehension, but you Wingtards would have to read AND comprehend it - the usual Catch-22 when dealing with the mentally infirm.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You obviously didn't read the analysis.

Just keep up your "trendings" Whirly! We wouldn't want you to get out of practice! Who knows by the 2016 election season you might actually predict an accurate "trending" line. I doubt it but I suppose it could occur!

Don't lose faith Whirly. Even if a blind hog "trends" long enough it will find an acorn occasionally.

[Whirlaway]

Feel free to jump into the dialogue with arguments of substance anytime BigTits.

[b2pop]

liberals do not know how to read or else they would have read the Constitution of the United States of America. Anyway I read the article and it makes sense to me because this government wants to crush the middle class.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Feel free to jump into the dialogue with arguments of substance anytime BigTits.

The truth hurts, doesn't it Whirly. Even when it is only "trending" truths!

[CJ7]

nobody pays taxes on the first 250K ... NOBODY.