Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
HRC was cleared to see those 150,000 emails. Only two sentences out of 150,000 emails were marked classified. Trumps staffer did not have any clearance to see classified information.
|
let me get back to ya on that ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Why would a staffer in Trump's Political Action Committee have scanned classified docs on her laptop?
|
seems someone doesn't want to cite a source. could it be it was an aide to Trump during his presidency? not a staffer at any PAC's? hmmm
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nichola...h=1f5156f31079
Trump Lawyers Turned Over More Classified Materials And A Laptop To DOJ, Reports Say
Key Facts
Handovers to the DOJ included an aide’s laptop, documents marked classified found at Mar-A-Lago and an empty folder titled “Classified Evening Briefings,” CNN reported, citing multiple unnamed sources.
An
aide to Trump put digital copies of the documents on a thumb drive and then uploaded them to the laptop, not knowing they were classified, according to CNN.
It’s not clear what information the documents might have contained.
A Trump campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from
Forbes.
per Forbes citing CNN, it was a aide. no mention of PAC's
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
HRC was cleared to see those 150,000 emails. Only two sentences out of 150,000 emails were marked classified. Trumps staffer did not have any clearance to see classified information.
|
was Clinton authorized to send those emails to her private (and insecure) email server?
was Clinton authorized to erase emails that had been subpoenaed?
now where did you find that statement? Seems the FBI has a different count.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-relea...-e-mail-system
"For example,
seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails)."
"None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail."
"Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it"
how do you or anyone else at this point know that the aide was not cleared at the time to see any classified material?
Why Did a Staffer in a Trump PAC Have Classified Docs On Her Laptop?
