Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer
"Father of the Year"? Maybe.
"Husband of the Year"? Now, that's a different story.
|
Not necessarily, some wives just want to be left alone sexually so if Hillary was like that, then other than neutering himself, Bill was maybe giving her what she really wanted. Now getting caught and embarrassing her pretty much puts him out of "Husband of the Year" running, but if our society weren't so screwed up she shouldn't have been embarrassed about him getting some if she didn't want any.
What I don't get (not having been married) is women who get a guy to marry her and then not only want to start changing him, but expect his libido to match hers when she is no longer interested in sex. I see this with a lot of my friends who do get married. After the kids and sometimes before the woman just has no interest in sex. Yet it is "unfaithful" to go outside the marriage (most) but the relationship is no longer sexual at all. Now that is just f@#$%^d up. The husband is then supposed to cut them off or what?
Of all places I don't see this as one to cast stones at Bill getting a little in the Oval office even from the TeaWipes. I do think it is bad to "get some" from an intern when you are in a more powerful position, but then if that is the case, the President is in a more powerful position than almost any woman so he (unless the President were a she) would never "get some".
Bill Clinton named 'Father of the Year'
