Well Honey, You Darned Sure Couldn't Work For ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, .....

[Jackie S]

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/...nchor-resigns/

My suggestion would be,come on back and work for for Fox News. They are the only major news organization that doesn't, as you say, "whitewash" a Presidents misdeeds.

Most of our "main stream media" are just shills for The Obama Aministration and The Democrat National Committee. Just like you current employer is a shill for Putin.

[LexusLover]

May be John Kerry will hire her as his "marketing maid"!

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/...nchor-resigns/

My suggestion would be,come on back and work for for Fox News. They are the only major news organization that doesn't, as you say, "whitewash" a Presidents misdeeds.

Most of our "main stream media" are just shills for The Obama Aministration and The Democrat National Committee. Just like you current employer is a shill for Putin.

Then you are agreeing Fox whitewashes Putin's actions?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

My suggestion would be,come on back and work for for Fox News. They are the only major news organization that doesn't, as you say, "whitewash" a Presidents misdeeds.

Apparently you did not watch many FAUX News broadcasts in the days, weeks, months and years following GW's ill fated and ill advised, spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq.

[JD Barleycorn]

Maybe you missed it but we won in Iraq despite the democratic blocking efforts. Then again, it was all politics by Barack and Hillary. Now Barack lost the peace.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Maybe you missed it but we won in Iraq despite the democratic blocking efforts. Then again, it was all politics by Barack and Hillary. Now Barack lost the peace.

BT struggles with "winners and losers" .... but so does the Chronicle.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

BT struggles with "winners and losers"

There was no struggle at all! I understood from early on that Dubya was a light weight, who was destined to become:

"The most unpopular (and incompetent) President in Modern History".

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...odern-history/

It took most others a little longer to reach that conclusion but it finally became obvious to them, as well.

A very few struggled with the grim reality that The Shrub was incompetent and never crossed the threshold.

It is easy to recognize those who fall in that category, they are wearing the dunce hat!

[I B Hankering]

It doesn't hurt BigKoTex the BUTTer Bar ASShat to lie! Odumbo's average approval rate is lower than Nixon's and Bush 43's!

[Yssup Rider]

Of course, Corpy, that wasn't his claim.

But why let that get in the way, you self-loathing gay fuck doll wannabe?

[Guest040616]

From CNN:

New poll numbers show bad news for President Bush.

WASHINGTON (CNN) - A new poll suggests that George W. Bush is the most unpopular president in modern American history.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Thursday indicates that 71 percent of the American public disapprove of how Bush his handling his job as president.

"No president has ever had a higher disapproval rating in any CNN or Gallup poll; in fact, this is the first time that any president's disapproval rating has cracked the 70 percent mark," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

"Bush's approval rating, which stands at 28 percent in our new poll, remains better than the all-time lows set by Harry Truman and Richard Nixon (22 percent and 24 percent, respectively) but even those two presidents never got a disapproval rating in the 70s," Holland added. "The previous all-time record in CNN or Gallup polling was set by Truman, 66 percent disapproval in January 1952."

CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider adds, "He is more unpopular than Richard Nixon was just before he resigned from the presidency in August 1974." President Nixon's disapproval rating in August 1974 stood at 67 percent.

The poll also indicates that support for the war in Iraq has never been lower. Thirty percent of those questioned favored the war while 68 percent opposed the conflict.
"Americans are growing more pessimistic about the war," Holland said. "In January, nearly half believed that things were going well for the U.S. in Iraq; now that figure has dropped to 39 percent."

The numbers on the Iraq war come on the five-year anniversary of President Bush's "mission accomplished" moment onboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, when Bush proclaimed that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

The record low support for the war in a CNN poll could be one reason behind the president's unpopularity, but it probably is not the only one.

"Support for the war, the assessment of the economy and approval of Mr. Bush are all about the same - bad," Schneider said.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted by telephone from Monday through Wednesday, with 1,008 adult Americans questioned. The poll's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com. ..odern-history/

[bojulay]

That took some guts, good for her.

[I B Hankering]

This "point in time" comparison, BigKoTex: the BUTTer Bar ASShat, is as valid as your "point in time" comparison.


A NATION CHALLENGED; A Snapshot Gives Bush 90% Approval
Published: September 24, 2001

WASHINGTON, Sept. 23— Ninety percent of Americans approve of the way President Bush is handling his job after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the highest rating for a president ever recorded by the Gallup polling group, USA Today and CNN reported today.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/24/us...-approval.html


Meanwhile, BigKoTex: the BUTTer Bar ASShat, W's overall average approval rating remains higher than your beauty queen Odumbo's.

[LordBeaverbrook]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This "point in time" comparison, BigKoTex: the BUTTer Bar ASShat, is as valid as your "point in time" comparison.


A NATION CHALLENGED; A Snapshot Gives Bush 90% Approval
Published: September 24, 2001

WASHINGTON, Sept. 23— Ninety percent of Americans approve of the way President Bush is handling his job after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the highest rating for a president ever recorded by the Gallup polling group, USA Today and CNN reported today.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/24/us...-approval.html


Meanwhile, BigKoTex: the BUTTer Bar ASShat, W's overall average approval rating remains higher than your beauty queen Odumbo's.

Meh, who cares? You are talking a popularity contest (how did that work out for the winners in high school - what did they turn out to be?) among an American public where a significant percentage believes in angels and that the earth is flat.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...sh-among-worst

Of course you have to factor in the known liberal bias of those who know actual facts about history so maybe that shouldn't be a valid measure of significance.

"Consider the following: Of the last 10 presidents only four were re-elected. And of those four, one resigned in disgrace; one was impeached; and one left office with one of the lowest approval ratings for a president in his last month in office since such polling began (Bush 43), having led American into its second worst depression.

Only one, Ronald Reagan, left with any degree of dignity."

And he was by then senile and mentally incompetent (a match for Bush 43 during his entire Presidency).

[LordBeaverbrook]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Maybe you missed it but we won in Iraq despite the democratic blocking efforts. Then again, it was all politics by Barack and Hillary. Now Barack lost the peace.

Ha! You call that a win? Keep 'em comin'

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by LordBeaverbrook

Meh, who cares? You are talking a popularity contest (how did that work out for the winners in high school - what did they turn out to be?) among an American public where a significant percentage believes in angels and that the earth is flat.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...sh-among-worst

Of course you have to factor in the known liberal bias of those who know actual facts about history so maybe that shouldn't be a valid measure of significance.

"Consider the following: Of the last 10 presidents only four were re-elected. And of those four, one resigned in disgrace; one was impeached; and one left office with one of the lowest approval ratings for a president in his last month in office since such polling began (Bush 43), having led American into its second worst depression.

Only one, Ronald Reagan, left with any degree of dignity."

And he was by then senile and mentally incompetent (a match for Bush 43 during his entire Presidency).

You are addressing a rebuttal, LawdBieberBabble; hopefully, it was the tint in your Kool Aid glasses and not some genetic, cognitive defect that caused you to miss the "popularity contest" posts of the initiator at:

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055054787&postcount=7

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055057801&postcount=10


BTW, LawdBieberBabble, here's a four month -- not years -- old poll that places Odumbo as the biggest failure.

http://today.yougov.com/news/2013/11...ts-presidents/