Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
646 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Jon Bon |
396 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| Starscream66 |
279 |
| George Spelvin |
265 |
| sharkman29 |
255 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 70795 | | biomed1 | 63272 | | Yssup Rider | 61003 | | gman44 | 53295 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 48665 | | WTF | 48267 | | pyramider | 46370 | | bambino | 42668 | | CryptKicker | 37220 | | The_Waco_Kid | 37067 | | Mokoa | 36496 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
01-18-2012, 01:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 29, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 138
|
NO PIPELINE! Thanks Mr. President
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 01:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Canada will sell that oil to somebody.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 02:16 PM
|
#3
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 701
|
Canada said it would run the pipeline straight west and sell the oil to Japan and China. Just another reason why the speachafier in chief needs to go.....
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 02:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Obama has made many stupid, irrational decisions. This is just one of them. Why he is turning down instant jobs during our depression is beyond me. We've discussed this before. Truly insane.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#5
|
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 6814
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 2,502
My ECCIE Reviews
|
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#6
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Shame,but there was a lot of heat from residents of some states the line would run through.Like Nebraska,wanted to protect the aquifer.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 03:38 PM
|
#7
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
|
Yeah, FUCK safe water in our aquifers. Money is more important than clean air and water. We can always make gas masks out of petroleum and buy water from T Boone and other water rights barons.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 03:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
We have thousands of miles of pipeline in the US which cause NO problem. This one wouldn't either. It's just President Obama sending more resources and jobs to China. Thanks, Mr. President!
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 04:25 PM
|
#9
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,060
|
We literally have thousands of miles of existing pipelines.
Not one of them has ever contaminated a aquifer.
This project has already been studied to death.
This is pure Eco-Fascism.
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 05:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
When gas is $4.00 this summer and unemployment is still 8% the President is going to have his ass handed to him.
Libs get your argument straight, its not the aquifer, its the oil sands. Jeez. Canada also pulled out of Kyoto.
Ride your unicorn to the polls in Nov.
|
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 05:59 PM
|
#11
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: United States of California
Posts: 1,706
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
We have thousands of miles of pipeline in the US which cause NO problem. This one wouldn't either. It's just President Obama sending more resources and jobs to China. Thanks, Mr. President!
|
Really? Maybe you use the wrong search engine?
Or maybe thousands is right, but what about the other MILLIONS of miles?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 07:39 PM
|
#12
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
We have thousands of miles of pipeline in the US which cause NO problem. This one wouldn't either. It's just President Obama sending more resources and jobs to China. Thanks, Mr. President!
|
So the Keystone Pipeline is going to be run to China? LMAO
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
We literally have thousands of miles of existing pipelines.
Not one of them has ever contaminated a aquifer. BULLSHIT! You don't understand aquifer or you don't research well.
This project has already been studied to death.
This is pure Eco-Fascism.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
When gas is $4.00 this summer and unemployment is still 8% the President is going to have his ass handed to him.
Libs get your argument straight, its not the aquifer, its the oil sands. Jeez. Canada also pulled out of Kyoto.
Ride your unicorn to the polls in Nov.
|
Are you saying that a leaking pipeline cannot contaminate an aquifer? Are you saying they are going to pump the oil SANDS through the pipeline? Back to school, gnadfly! It has never been the liberals who are complaining about this who need a better education.
And pulling out of Kyoto means what - climate change is a hoax or that the greedy are on a collision course to destroy the planet?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 08:09 PM
|
#13
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Stupid shit, your reading comprehension is worse than WTF's.
The US went to Canada with concerns that the production from oil sands produced more CO2 and had more environmental impact than normal oil production. Canada told them to mind their own business. Canada admitted when they backed out of Kyoto in part because their CO2 footprint was growing due to the oil sands production.
This is the "talking point" that Obama is pissed off about because he has no control over Canada and cannot appease the eviro-nazis on this issue. It has nothing to do with the aquifer. My understanding is there's an oil pipeline already running thru the aquifer.
Have fun riding your unicorn to the polls. Hope your alarm clock is powered by Solyndra energy.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 09:36 PM
|
#14
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Stevie, you are truly an idiot. The backup plan is for Canada to pipe the oil to British Columbia, where it will be loaded on Chinese tankers. Do you try to be this stupid, or does it come naturally to you?
And Wave, please let me know where the last three major pipeline leaks occurred, and the what the consequences were. Thank you.
|
|
|
Quote
| 4 users liked this post |
|
01-18-2012, 09:50 PM
|
#15
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 12, 2010
Location: allen, texas
Posts: 6,044
|
I actually think the President is wrong on this one I think the gains are greater than the risks.
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
