HILLARY CLINTON "KEPT THE ANTI-TERRORIST UNIT OUT OF THE BENGHAZI LOOP"

[Whirlaway]

To keep the Benghazi cover up contained, the Obama lies intact, and not jeopardize Obama's re-election chances..............


Fucking Democrats are despicable...........Americans died and Obama and Clinton lied.


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...it-Out-of-Loop

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

To keep the Benghazi cover up contained, the Obama lies intact, and not jeopardize Obama's re-election chances..............


Fucking Democrats are despicable...........Americans died and Obama and Clinton lied.


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...it-Out-of-Loop

Common theme... Bush lied and then Americans died.

Which is worse....

[Whirlaway]

Don't play stupid WTF, Bush didn't lie; everyone believed there were WMDs in Iraq.......most everyone agreed that Hussein would use (or hand to terrorists) those WMDs...........big difference.

[JD Barleycorn]

He's not playing.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Don't play stupid WTF, Bush didn't lie; everyone believed there were WMDs in Iraq.......most everyone agreed that Hussein would use (or hand to terrorists) those WMDs...........big difference.

Everyone believed his cherry picked lie...

Big difference.

They wanted intel to justify invasion. Not intel and then decide what best for this country...they had their minds made up. Anybody that gave a differing fact was push aside.

If you do not understand how much worse that is, have another glass of kool-aid my friend.

[Whirlaway]

Nope, at the time everyone went on record telling Americans that it was a slam dunk that Iraq had WMDs.......................... ........

Here is the list of all the Democrats and what they said; notably Gore, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Kerry, Madeline Albright, et al......

Quotes from Democrats about WMD

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

Quoted on CNN

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." — President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Quoted on CNN

Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." — Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Transcript of remarks made at a Town Hall meeting in Columbus, Ohio — from USIA

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." — Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb 18, 1998

Transcript of remarks made at a Town Hall Meeting in Columbus, Ohio — From USIA

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." — Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry (D — MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998

See letter to Clinton by Levin, Daschle, Kerry and others

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." — Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Statement by Rep. Nancy Pelosi — House of Representatives website

"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

Answer to a question at the Chicago Council of Foreign Affairs

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." — Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

Letter to President George W. Bush signed by 9 Congressmen, including Democrats Harold Ford, Jr., Joseph Lieberman, and Benjamin Gilman.

" We should be hell bent on getting those weapons of mass destruction, hell bent on having a credible approach to them, but we should try to do it in a way which keeps the world together and that achieves our goal which is removing the... defanging Saddam.." — Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Dec. 9, 2002

Online with Jim Lehrer — Public Broadcasting Service

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Transcript of Gore's speech, printed in USA Today

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Transcript of Gore's speech, printed in USA Today

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

U.S. Senate — Ted Kennedy

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

Congressional Record — Robert Byrd

"When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region. I will vote yes because I believe it is the best way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable." —Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John F. Kerry

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." — Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Jay Rockefeller

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" — Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Rep. Henry Waxman

"In 1998, the United States also changed its underlying policy toward Iraq from containment to regime change and began to examine options to effect such a change, including support for Iraqi opposition leaders within the country and abroad. In the 4 years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaida members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

"It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein wiill continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East which, as we know all too well, affects American security."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Hillary Clinton

"The Joint Chiefs should provide Congress with casualty estimates for a war in Iraq as they have done in advance of every past conflict. These estimates should consider Saddam's possible use of chemical or biological weapons against our troops.

"Unlike the gulf war, many experts believe Saddam would resort to chemical and biological weapons against our troops in a desperate -attempt to save his regime if he believes he and his regime are ultimately threatened."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) Oct. 8, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Ted Kennedy

"There is one thing we agree upon, and that is that Saddam Hussein is an evil man. He is a tyrant. He has used chemical and biological weapons on his own people. He has disregarded United Nations resolutions calling for inspections of his capabilities and research and development programs. His forces regularly fire on American and British jet pilots enforcing the no-fly zones in the north and south of his country. And he has the potential to develop and deploy nuclear weapons... — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Bob Graham

But inspectors have had a hard time getting truthful information from the Iraqis they interview. Saddam Hussein terrorizes his people, including his weapons scientists, so effectively that they are afraid to be interviewed in private, let alone outside the country. They know that even the appearance of cooperation could be a death sentence for themselves or their families.

"To overcome this obstacle, and to discover and dismantle Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, UNMOVIC and the IAEA must interview relevant persons securely and with their families protected, even if they protest publicly against this treatment. Hans Blix may dislike running ''a defection agency,' but that could be the only way to obtain truthful information about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction — Sen. Joseph Biden

Congressional Record — Sen. Joseph Biden

"With respect to Saddam Hussein and the threat he presents, we must ask ourselves a simple question: Why? Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don't even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits? Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents?
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), October 9, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John F. Kerry

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.

"Iraq has continued to seek nuclear weapons and develop its arsenal in defiance of the collective will of the international community, as expressed through the United Nations Security Council. It is violating the terms of the 1991 cease-fire that ended the Gulf war and as many as 16 Security Council resolutions, including 11 resolutions concerning Iraq's efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction. — Sen. John Edwards, October 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John Edwards

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/mostert/040816

[WTF]

Bush took us to war with his lies...not Clinton or Gore or Kerry but GW Bush. That is what you base crimes on, actions not 'we think'.... Bush acted. He is the one responsible, he called the shots. Four thousand dead soldiers dead and you Tea tards cry about one border agent and four state department deaths like they were millions. I'm not buying it being anything but politics, just admit it.

[CJ7]

funny how much control the dems had over Bush isn't it

[JD Barleycorn]

You might as well forget history and logic, WTF has a mental illness. You could show him and he won't see, you can tell him and he can't hear, you can appeal to logic but he just can't think. He walks the night searching for souls to eat, he is an Obamzombie.



I suppose we'll put that on WTF's tombstone, "Fuck the four and the border patrol agents (plus the 400 dead Mexicans, the hundreds in Chicago, the needless dead in Afghanistan) I just feel good about having Obama inside me." It will be a large tombstone.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You might as well forget history and logic, WTF has a mental illness. You could show him and he won't see, you can tell him and he can't hear, you can appeal to logic but he just can't think. He walks the night searching for souls to eat, he is an Obamzombie.



I suppose we'll put that on WTF's tombstone, "Fuck the four and the border patrol agents (plus the 400 dead Mexicans, the hundreds in Chicago, the needless dead in Afghanistan) I just feel good about having Obama inside me." It will be a large tombstone.

We can put "Fuc the four thousand plus soldiers that Bush sent to die" on your circle jerk of a tombstone. We will bury you face up and mouth open so your Navy mates can cum dump one last load for old times sake...

[Yssup Rider]

What the fuck is this, Whineaway? Antique (source) Road Show? You've got nothing in your whining a less than a decade old. Nothing that occurred since your LORD AND SAVIOR, George W. Tapdancing Christ Bush was in office (did we REALLY do that? Did you shitbreaths really re-elect that toad?).


Are you sure the Founding Fucking Framers didn't have an opinion on this? How about the fucking Bible? or Breitbart?


Rube!

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You might as well forget history and logic, WTF has a mental illness. You could show him and he won't see, you can tell him and he can't hear, you can appeal to logic but he just can't think. He walks the night searching for souls to eat, he is an Obamzombie.



I suppose we'll put that on WTF's tombstone, "Fuck the four and the border patrol agents (plus the 400 dead Mexicans, the hundreds in Chicago, the needless dead in Afghanistan) I just feel good about having Obama inside me." It will be a large tombstone.

Is a Obazombie as dumb as a Beckazoid?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Is a Obazombie as dumb as a Beckazoid?

I'd like to stick my dick in one of those Fox News Bengazizoids bitchs! I'd start with Megan Kelly...

[JCM800]

Originally Posted by WTF

I'd like to stick my dick in one of those Fox News Bengazizoids bitchs! I'd start with Megan Kelly...

hell yeah...

mk.JPG

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by JCM800

hell yeah...

Attachment 214800

Good Luck WTF...Johnny