Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Kelly TNT · 12-19-2009, 11:44 PM

I saw this on another website. The question was asked a little differently. Mine has a little more Cream Filling.

What do you think is more Acceptable?

Being an Escort?

~OR~
Having Been "With" an Escort?

~Kelly TNT

ithyphallicus · 12-20-2009, 12:30 AM

Is this a loaded question?

Kelly TNT · 12-20-2009, 12:46 AM

LOL....

It wasn't meant to be. I just thought it was interesting. Different. You know...Aaaawkwaaard!

Nah, I just thought it might bring out some interesting opinions. We'll see!

~Kelly TNT

Guest050911 · 12-20-2009, 01:13 AM

Honestly, being with. More acceptable to have paid than being paid. IMHO

1thatgotaway · 12-20-2009, 01:26 AM

6 of one, half dozen of the other....

TexTushHog · 12-20-2009, 03:05 AM

Being with. Part of the old sexist American double standard.

CoHorn · 12-20-2009, 08:36 AM

I keep trying to join the ranks of the providers, but I haven't had any calls on my $10 specials (Sorry, ladies only).

Since I have only been on the "seen an escort" side of the equation, I will have to go with that side until a lady allows me to cross over to the dark side

Guest012211-3 · 12-20-2009, 09:00 AM

That depends, is it my husband who has been with the escort? LOL, just kidding...I would never get married

I hate to say it, but it's more acceptable to pay for it

KohanaKoa · 12-20-2009, 09:50 AM

Within our still chauvinistic society it would have to be "with".

mikahranae · 12-20-2009, 10:16 AM

Sorry this is off the subject, but I had to comment on Nicole's avatar. It's so damn hot. I'm used to seeing her avatar on ASPD, so I had to take a double look. Whoa!!!!

Carrie Hillcrest · 12-21-2009, 04:00 PM

I guess you're double-damned if you've done both, huh?

chipper · 12-21-2009, 04:12 PM

It certainly depends on your audience. I think most of us are pretty qccepting of each other. In other company I would expect it to be about the same. However, I haven't seen Tiger's ladies criticized nearly as much as he has been.

vnurse · 12-21-2009, 04:42 PM

chipper, you make a VERY good point! It is surprising how little has been said about the ladies in all that mess!

I feel like society would be a little more okay with the guys "participating" than the ladies because they would more than likely chalk it up to: "boys will be boys" sort of thing.

Torito · 12-21-2009, 06:13 PM

Both are OK. For me the truly only acceptable condition associated with your question is, "being with an escort." "Been with," past tense is not acceptable. Leads to a currently horny condition. Present is highly preferred. For example for me been with last night. Horny today. LOL

Seriously, in society it seems obvious that been with is more accepted. I am not sure why. Both did the same thing. One for a living, sometimes to support family or others. The other person has only the justification that he wanted to have fun. How screwed up is that thinking. Personally, the fact that a woman is or has been a provider neither increases nor decreases my respect for her as a woman. I have dated providers (indy to AMP)from time to time over the last 20+ years. The reasons that it did not work out had nothing to do with her business.

BTW TNT, sorry about our missed connection.

Torito

ithyphallicus · 12-21-2009, 08:52 PM

I guess it depends on who you are. Who came out looking better in the Eliot Spitzer imbroglio? Surely it's debatable, but Spitzer didn't fare well at all and his "mistress" seems to have parlayed her interest into something positive: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/wash...tzer-no-9.html