Encounter: no to khloelove

[Justformeand]

Date: 08/21
Name: khloelove777
Phone: 479
Email Address: -
URL / Website: -
City: fayetteville
State: Arkansas
Address: Fayetteville motel
Activities: Na
Hair Length and Color: Blonde
Age: 27
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Pretty face but loose skin all over. Not a good sight.
Recommendation: No

[austin88998833]

http://gif.co/VkXH.gif

[Exchequer]

Thanks very nice useless review! Appreciate it

[Baconman]

Umm, very interesting! You would think with a lackluster encounter there would be more information!

[scotchgus]

Seems to be the norm in all of the other reviews generated by OP. I've not seen the provider but doesn't exactly deter me from doing so either.

[Tocroc10]

My experience with her was disappointing. She remarked, on our visit, that she has clients that only want her company.

[arealone]

Originally Posted by Tocroc10

My experience with her was disappointing. She remarked, on our visit, that she has clients that only want her company.

I was looking for your review and couldn't find it?

[Arboater]

That's disappointing. Thanks for the intel.

[Looker201]

Is this her?
https://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=460545

[Baconman]

Was this a review or some disgruntled boyfriend or someone trying to make Khloe look bad. The OP doing his usual vague encounter review. I'm surprised it's still up! I haven't seen Khloe but this review wouldn't stop me from seeing her because it sounded like someone had an axe to grind.

[Exchequer]

Originally Posted by Baconman

Was this a review or some disgruntled boyfriend or someone trying to make Khloe look bad. The OP doing his usual vague encounter review. I'm surprised it's still up! I haven't seen Khloe but this review wouldn't stop me from seeing her because it sounded like someone had an axe to grind.

+1

[austin88998833]

After being on the board it seems for the better part of 24 hours the reference or accusation of illicit pharmaceuticals is removed. I wrote a review on 7-16 that contained a cryptic statement referencing 420 in a recreational sense. I’ll give the mod credit he picked up on it pretty fast and removed it. My goal was for it to be so cryptic that no one would understand what the hell I was talking about. But our mod is a sharp cookie. This one is more puzzling bc it wasn’t cryptic at all and stayed up considerably longer. I want honest reviews and not something if an OP has an axe to grind with a certain provider. If it’s all true, it’s all true but if not, how much damage could that unjustly do to a providers reputation? Now I’m just an outsider looking in and I’ve never met either party in this encounter. But unbiased truth is paramount in order to maintain the integrity of the encounter reviews. PA credit notwithstanding, half assed reviews like this should be taken completely down off the board IMHO. THeY are of no use to anyone.

[arealone]

The reviewer obviously has not taken the advice given to him on his 3 previous reviews, all referencing the link of how to do a review. Makes me wonder if this, or any other encounter he has reported on, actually happened. I agree with Austin in this regard. This totally uninformative review should be removed.

[Parttimehobbyist]

Originally Posted by Baconman

Was this a review or some disgruntled boyfriend or someone trying to make Khloe look bad. The OP doing his usual vague encounter review. I'm surprised it's still up! I haven't seen Khloe but this review wouldn't stop me from seeing her because it sounded like someone had an axe to grind.

+1

[Justformeand]

Is there a way for me to remove this review.