I know that adding "bi" to a providers profile has been brought up before

[lovergrrl]

But it's been a couple of years (based on a search) and I was wondering if the powers that be will ever consider it? With the amount of single ladies (like myself) and couples entering this wonderful hobby increasing, it's time to add some info that helps folks like us narrow down our searches better...not to mention anyone interested in 3some activities.

[trey32]

And specify BIpolar and BIsexual

[lovergrrl]

Originally Posted by trey32

And specify BIpolar and BIsexual

Lol I assume that BiPolar is a given, but Bisexual is not

[SexyPlatinum]

The op is not longer around well I love the threesome scene.

[DakineOne777]

Originally Posted by SexyPlatinum

The op is not longer around well I love the threesome scene.

What happened to the OP?

[Simply Spice]

She left because she's a lesbian or bisexual, not entirely sure but she sees providers and see was told she would not be able to review them strictly because she's a female, even though she isn't a provider. So she left the site just like that.

[DakineOne777]

Thanks, Ms Spice.

Frankly I'm not very happy about that either. After I asked the question I found her goodby post on the other thread. That issue impacts me too - I usually see providers with my hubby, but I have seen a few all by myself as well. So my husband can post a review of our couples session or of his solo ones, but I can't? It does seem ridiculous.

I hope that they change that. It really isn't fair at all.

[down4fun]

Yep Spice is right on about that. I am with you Dakine the more we know the better off we are. I would love to know if a provider works good with a couple as that is what I do the most on here.

[DakineOne777]

Originally Posted by down4fun

Yep Spice is right on about that. I am with you Dakine the more we know the better off we are. I would love to know if a provider works good with a couple as that is what I do the most on here.

I'm realizing that unless the experience is standard vanilla boy/girl sex, this site isn't interested. So not much info for couples or to see if a provider is bisexual or not. It's like they are stuck in another era here.

I did go over to the other site and read a few of the OP's reviews...they are really well written and downright HOT! She writes a nice & informative review. It comes down simply as it's this site's loss and that other sites gain.

[MaxiMilyen]

Maybe they are proud of their Christian values and biased "good ole boy" attitudes or something? Not that an upstanding site owner of this type of community owes the likes of us peons, an explanation of the why's and how's of "their" site which all of us make it possible for them to profit from, if they even do so. By the amount of ads all over the place, they at least get paid per click? So there is that. And guys do love to click anything that guarantees "free" sex and easy sign up with no BS, right? Either that, or they are blatantly homophobic and feel threatened that some nice lady might steal their thunder in ROS by posting an accurate play by play?

I dunno, but it seems to me that without an audience, there is no site for them to be upstanding owners of, for our close knit community...right? hmmm Maybe that's the actual point? Slowly pushing fed up people over to other sites that are more up to date in their thinking and attitudes, so they can post the more lucrative ads or something?

[DakineOne777]

Originally Posted by MaxiMilyen

Either that, or they are blatantly homophobic and feel threatened that some nice lady might steal their thunder in ROS by posting an accurate play by play?

I think you nailed it, Ms Milyen.
Nothing is more threatening to an insecure man than a confident woman who not only doesn't need him, but can best him.

What better way to marginalize those that dare question the status quo than with silence? No muss, no fuss, no bother.

First they ignore you
Then they laugh at you
Then they fight you
Then you win.