I usually like snopes, as it often gets legitimate cites/references. As for the article on crown tattoos, wtf?
"Moreover,
crown tattoos are a popular choice among the inked. We found no evidence that crown tattoos were linked to sex trafficking before 7 September 2015; however, we located a number of proudly-displayed, intentionally-chosen crown tattoo examples"
They searched twitter for the words "crown tattoos" and that constitutes definitive research. Twitter has made the users of it dumb, even snopes. If you search "dick tattoos" on twitter, it brings up some images of Moby Dick tattoos. That doesn't mean I am going to use that combination of words to access literary fans.