Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
396 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
279 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70795 | biomed1 | 63272 | Yssup Rider | 61003 | gman44 | 53295 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48665 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42664 | CryptKicker | 37220 | The_Waco_Kid | 37066 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
06-28-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,860
|
Fox News Shows Just How Biased They Are
Fox News did not even bother to read the entire opinion, they just started making up stuff after reading a few lines. From the Huffington:
CNN and Fox News were left with egg on their faces on Thursday, as they got the Supreme Court's ruling on President Obama's health care law wrong — and even managed to make Obama initially think his health care law had been partially overturned.
The trouble started early for CNN. Congressional correspondent Kate Boulduan read out part of the Court's ruling, which said that the individual mandate could not be upheld using the Commerce Clause. Disastrously, though, it failed to pick up the other part of the ruling, which said that it could be upheld as a tax.
"Wow, that's a dramatic moment," Wolf Blitzer said, as a chyron saying "SUPREME CT. KILLS INDIVIDUAL MANDATE" flashed on the screen.
"The Justices have just gutted, Wolf, the centerpiece provision of the health care law," John King said, adding that it was a "direct blow to President Obama."
The network addressed the error in a statement. A spokesperson explained how it happened and said, "CNN regrets that it didn't wait to report out the full and complete opinion regarding the mandate
No shit Sherlock. And people wonder why Fox News can't get a license in Canada.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:18 PM
|
#2
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLouie
Fox News did not even bother to read the entire opinion, they just started making up stuff after reading a few lines. From the Huffington:
CNN and Fox News were left with egg on their faces on Thursday, as they got the Supreme Court's ruling on President Obama's health care law wrong — and even managed to make Obama initially think his health care law had been partially overturned.
The trouble started early for CNN. Congressional correspondent Kate Boulduan read out part of the Court's ruling, which said that the individual mandate could not be upheld using the Commerce Clause. Disastrously, though, it failed to pick up the other part of the ruling, which said that it could be upheld as a tax.
"Wow, that's a dramatic moment," Wolf Blitzer said, as a chyron saying "SUPREME CT. KILLS INDIVIDUAL MANDATE" flashed on the screen.
"The Justices have just gutted, Wolf, the centerpiece provision of the health care law," John King said, adding that it was a "direct blow to President Obama."
The network addressed the error in a statement. A spokesperson explained how it happened and said, "CNN regrets that it didn't wait to report out the full and complete opinion regarding the mandate
No shit Sherlock. And people wonder why Fox News can't get a license in Canada.
|
Louise, you spray piss like a punkass cat. It's very annoying.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:18 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,860
|
It also lead to this classic photo redo
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:24 PM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Louie, what you posted was critical of CNN for not reading the opinion. Where does it talk about what Fox reported?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:32 PM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 30, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,648
|
Fox anchor Bill Hemmer told viewers the individual mandate was ruled unconstitutional while a banner across the TV screen declared, “Supreme Court Finds Healthcare Individual Mandate Unconstitutional.” Fox didn’t offer up a mea culpa. “We gave our viewers the news as it happened,” said Fox’s Michael Clemente, according to the Associated Press — which correctly reported on the ruling. “Fox reported the facts, as they came in.”
but you knew that already CoG
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:40 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
BigLouise used an article critical of CNN to bash Fox. I just want to know what his point really was.
By the way, I think all the networks were fooled, since no one expected the mandate to be upheld as a tax. When the Court announced that the individual mandate was unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause, they ran with it. It was after that when the Court announced that it was Constitutional as a tax. Fox wasn't alone in that. As Louise's article shows.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-28-2012, 10:51 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
|
The real reason Fox News is kept out of Canada is because of a political bias against conservatives. The official reason is that Fox News isn't sufficiently truthful.
Al Jazeera, a defender of terrorism, is allowed to broadcast in Canada. Russia Today is a shameless propagandist for the radical left and is also allowed to broadcast in Canada. If Fox News was banned over a concern for truthfullness, Al Jazeera and Russia Today would be banned.
I'm pretty sure you can't get Fox News in Cuba or Venezuela either.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 12:35 AM
|
#9
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
BigLouise used an article critical of CNN to bash Fox. I just want to know what his point really was.
By the way, I think all the networks were fooled, since no one expected the mandate to be upheld as a tax. When the Court announced that the individual mandate was unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause, they ran with it. It was after that when the Court announced that it was Constitutional as a tax. Fox wasn't alone in that. As Louise's article shows.
|
What do you expect from an intellectually dishonest troll?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 12:44 AM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I just thought he had info about Fox News bias, but the only company described in his post is CNN. Come on, Big Louise, clear this up!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 05:05 AM
|
#11
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I just thought he had info about Fox News bias, but the only company described in his post is CNN. Come on, Big Louise, clear this up!
|
Look Chicken Little...he said Fox News was not allowed in Canada.
He then proceeded to explain one reason why he thought so. Which was both Fox and CNN got it wrong at first. Only CNN admitted as much.
Is that to hard a point to understand?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 06:06 AM
|
#12
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I just thought he had info about Fox News bias, but the only company described in his post is CNN. Come on, Big Louise, clear this up!
|
If you don't watch T V it is hard to keep up.Both CNN and Fox reported it wrong.Sorry
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 06:06 AM
|
#13
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Is that to hard a point to understand?
|
Apparently so! That's why he is a StupidOldFart!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 08:12 AM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Look Chicken Little...he said Fox News was not allowed in Canada.
He then proceeded to explain one reason why he thought so. Which was both Fox and CNN got it wrong at first. Only CNN admitted as much.
Is that to hard a point to understand?
|
He says that all the time. The article he used to support it didn't. Why is it that CNN and Fox both got it wrong, but only Fox is biased?
Yeah, hard to understand.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-29-2012, 10:18 AM
|
#15
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 126013
Join Date: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Rocking in my rocking chair on my porch..
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekim008
If you don't watch T V it is hard to keep up.Both CNN and Fox reported it wrong.Sorry
|
This was hilarious yesterday, I had my TV set with 3 channels on it.. and Fox,CNN,and MSNBC were all on. As I watched it I did a double take because 2 were reporting it was shot down, and MSNBC reported it had been upheld.
It says a lot when you see the right leaning media reporting things wrong and not taking the time to get things right. They are only interested in pushing their right wing propaganda and misinforming their viewers. Truth is beyond them...
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|