Great question and thanks for the input ladies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDMcGee
I agree, and .......
I think physical deception is a huge no-no in this arena... Since you have to be attracted....to enjoy your time.
....... I do have a pretty face :-P
|
DD, I think most guys have a hard time looking you in the face with those nice breasts to stare at.... LOL.
Physical attraction is a huge thing for men and you are right, men will either be attracted to a "type" or not.....
Physical DECEPTION is unacceptable, in my book. I have no issue with a lady fudging a few years about her age..... especially if she doesn't look it.
Katy Segal is HOT and she is 58 years old (Sons of Anarchy)... does not look her age.
I have no issue with minor "details" being changed, faces blurred, tattoo's blurred, etc. on a current pic. I saw pics of a lady that were clearly maked that they were recent, but had been taken BEFORE she got a new tattoo. She also had pics of her after her tattoo. Again, a complete picture and a "full disclosure".
One of the Austin adorables used a stock photo of a nude blonde taken from behind, as an avatar for a while. While it was NOT her, it looked very much like her from behind. When she was complimented on it, she was clear to tell people it was not actually her. (However, IMO, as it was a very good REPRESENTATION of her, I had no issue with it).
Posting a 10 year old pic of yourself is, IMO, unacceptable. Plain and simple. (Unless you want to clearly state that "this is 10 year old pic").
I saw a BP lady one time, her pics were beautiful, however, they were taken years ago, were taken before her baby and had been digitally altered. Shameful, but expected on BP.
Unacceptable on ECCIE.
My .02
Respectfully,
OldSarge