Review or not to review? which is better?

[mssassy]

ok opinions here you guys? Providers do you prefer reviews and why? if you do prefer reviews do you fear too many reviews will make you a target for le? if you dont prefer reviews why ? guys your preferance reviews or not and why?

My personal thought: Reviews can go either way. A review revealing too much can make a provider a target too little reviews will make you guys question and not feel as safe.


With that said I am off to go work out more. Perhaps the pics of the new curves that will be out in jan will be deemed as fake by some and hopefully loved and played with by many .

[Lily Blair]

I think we had this conversation.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=10117

[sadie]

I knew you looked familiar. Hummm..not riding this rollercoaster baby girl.

[urhuckleberry]

Back on topic, a lot has changed in AR over the last 10 months. A legitimate question that should be discussed in light of new security concerns.


Huck

[Miss Dreams]

Lmao I swear to everything Lily I was going to post that. We had this discussion not too long back, BUT to someone wanting to know, that is a good question but look back Sassy...!!

[Lily Blair]

New security concerns that didn't exist ten months ago? Such as?

[guest071811-3]

Some of ya'll are freakin killing me!!

[guest031513-1]

I think that if those who had been busted were to chime in here that none of them would say it was over a review on eccie, but you never know.

[Lily Blair]

Exactly.

But I've never been arrested. Maybe someone who has been arrested several times knows better than I do.

[mssassy]

ok i am so sorry i posted that. life and time has changed in the hobby . things such as a review to be or not to be reviewed and the preceding questions should make be brought up often both for any new providers and for any new hobbyist. the topic of better screening tools, better computer software (for cells and computers) should also be discusssed as well .

Lily I agree those who have been busted more then once should chime in.

Sadie Im sure you think you recongize me but trust me I dont think you do. I may not play politics on here but I am a southern girl born and bred and that includes my temperament you know sweet charming, a lady and behind closed doors a hellcat lol

Huck can you please close this? This was a legimate topic that turned into something that it shouldnt have.

I do regret posting this

[sadie]

Originally Posted by mssassy

Sadie Im sure you think you recongize me but trust me I dont think you do.

Nope. I'm right. No need to close the thread... interested in hearing you're contribution in keeping everyone out of the pokey.

[shorty]

Damn!!!! Only been gone a week and the ladies aren't playing nice anymore!! LOL

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by Blond_Lily

New security concerns that didn't exist ten months ago? Such as?

For one, A well known hobbyist who turned over all his accounts and passwords(incluidng P411) rather than face prosecution...



A few more concerns that are still being watched...

But all that may have happened before in the good ole days.

Huck

[Lily Blair]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

For one, A well known hobbyist who turned over all his accounts and passwords(incluidng P411) rather than face prosecution...



A few more concerns that are still being watched...

But all that may have happened before in the good ole days.

Huck

The same thing happened a year and a half ago. Not a new phenomenon.

But like I said, maybe there is some rational explanation for how a review leaks personal information. I just haven't had any problems and don't know anyone else who has either except just to confirm that the provider is still working, which is already confirmed by ads.

[SouthernBorn]

Kind of raising that old screening argument again, doesn't it? The issue is not whether to screen, but how best to do it . . . . but, alas, I do not have the energy to kick that hornet's nest today.

-SB