Why a no review policy?

[ss4699]

As one of the new mods reminded us (in the review section of course!) any lady who advertises must allow reviews. So why would any lady who chooses to do an ad here NOT want a review written. Unless of course the reveiw would be bad? Why a no review policy for any provider advertising or not?
Any one care to share?

[JayceeRivers]

For me personally it comes down to privacy intimacy and connection. What I might do with one I may not do with another and vise versa.

Example: I may feel comfortable letting one client dominate me but not the other. Or perhaps one particular day I am in the mood for greek. Or Maybe one lucky guy gets a extra hour at no cost because i have the time to spare.

Ect...

The other reason is generally I build a fantasy around each person. His and mine combined and it kind of shatters the illusion to see it written up in detail someplace.

Though I have never said NO REVIEWS. I have always gently discouraged them. For me the worst would be pressured into something I am not comfortable with or dissapointing a hopeful client.

Anyway those are my reasons hope it helps shed some light

[The DarkSide]

Wow Greek, extra time and any secret fantasy OMG please let me get lucky and I click with Jaycee

Originally Posted by JayceeRivers

For me personally it comes down to privacy intimacy and connection. What I might do with one I may not do with another and vise versa.

Example: I may feel comfortable letting one client dominate me but not the other. Or perhaps one particular day I am in the mood for greek. Or Maybe one lucky guy gets a extra hour at no cost because i have the time to spare.

Ect...

The other reason is generally I build a fantasy around each person. His and mine combined and it kind of shatters the illusion to see it written up in detail someplace.

Though I have never said NO REVIEWS. I have always gently discouraged them. For me the worst would be pressured into something I am not comfortable with or dissapointing a hopeful client.

Anyway those are my reasons hope it helps shed some light

[Lil Oral Annie]

I have asked one man to not write a review of me, because he is very, very detailed and what I perceive as mean in his reviews. I think it's just a personal thing, and he agreed to not write a review in order to see me.

Eccie policy though, is that if you advertise here, you can't have a no review policy.

I just look at it on a case-by-case basis.

[JayceeRivers]

Originally Posted by The DarkSide

Wow Greek, extra time and any secret fantasy OMG please let me get lucky and I click with Jaycee

The greek is more of a combination of mood...size and comfort levels.

[Guest052813-01]

I did some consultation with the other mods of the board. The policy of ECCIE is that any provider who has an "internet presence" may have a review posted of their encounter in the appropriate review forum.

As I stated in the thread referenced by NTT, it is a "gentleman's agreement" between the provider and the client as to whether a review is to be posted or not. I would be of the opinion that if a hobbyist wanted to post a review of a provider that has a "no review" policy, that hobbyist may not be able to see that provider again.

However, unless it is a security issue, or the reviewer asks for the review to be pulled, the review is fraudulent or the provider reviewed is truly UTR (no ads or intenet) and asks for the review to be pulled, the review will remain. There are exceptions to every rule, of course, and there are DNR sticky notes at the front of every forum, especially in the Spa forum. But any provider who has advertised via their own website, on BP, in the provider ads forums, or as part of their signature line, is eligible for review.

[Guest121212]

Originally Posted by fritz3552

I did some consultation with the other mods of the board. The policy of ECCIE is that any provider who has an "internet presence" may have a review posted of their encounter in the appropriate review forum. [...]

[...]But any provider who has advertised via their own website, on BP, in the provider ads forums, or as part of their signature line, is eligible for review.

Um, NO!

That is completely contrary to the stated rule and the policy of ECCIE as outlined by the owners - FROM DAY ONE.

The stated rule of ECCIE has always been that a verified provider may elect AT THE TIME OF HER JOINING THE SITE (or thereafter if she agrees to certain limitations) a blanket no review policy which remains in effect (indefinitely) as long as she 1) does not place an ad (formally) in the threads specified for such - such as the "Weekend Line-up", etc. and 2) She does not create a showcase.

I think we'll need Chris or T-bone to chime in on this one as you plainly and simply didn't read the stated rules of the very Website you volunteered to assist in moderating . . . and the mods you "checked with" are patently incorrect. If there was a policy change regarding NRP/DNR (no review policy / do not review) here on ECCIE it would have been plainly communicated to those Escorts and providers that elected such when they joined the community (as I did). It has not, and the rule is still published.

AS EVIDENCE OF SUCH - From the ECCIE rules: RULE #29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board.

Additionally, as CaptainKaos (a former moderator here in KC) can attest (after lengthy discussion and FORMAL interpretation of the rule[s] in question by St Chris), a listing of availability in a signature line is NOT considered to be an advertisement in violation of the NRP/DNR exception.

Also from that discussion (of which have a copy) . . . Signature lines containing tour dates are acceptable for ladies with NRP/DNR status, mentioning rates or services in a signature line is not allowed. ALSO, contact information (such as a phone number) is allowed and does not violate the rule as it was clarified last year by St. Chris himself via PM. ThreADs too are allowed for ANY member regardless of NRP/DNR status - and linking to an external Website is perfectly okay . . . Having a presence anywhere else on the Internet or a lady advertising on Backpage does NOT negate her policy here on ECCIE. It hasn't since the site began . . .

I clarified every word and aspect of the rule prior to joining this site with both Becky and T-bone. They both said THE RULE IS VERY SPECIFIC and the totality of the policy is contained within rule #29.

- Jackie Devlin

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by Jackie Devlin

Um, NO!

That is completely contrary to the stated rule and the policy of ECCIE as outlined by the owners - FROM DAY ONE.

The stated rule of ECCIE has always been that a verified provider may elect AT THE TIME OF HER JOINING THE SITE (or thereafter if she agrees to certain limitations) a blanket no review policy which remains in effect (indefinitely) as long as she 1) does not place an ad (formally) in the threads specified for such - such as the "Weekend Line-up", etc. and 2) She does not create a showcase.

I think we'll need Chris or T-bone to chime in on this one as you plainly and simply didn't read the stated rules of the very Website you volunteered to assist in moderating . . . and the mods you "checked with" are patently incorrect. If there was a policy change regarding NRP/DNR (no review policy / do not review) here on ECCIE it would have been plainly communicated to those Escorts and providers that elected such when they joined the community (as I did). It has not, and the rule is still published.

AS EVIDENCE OF SUCH - From the ECCIE rules: RULE #29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board.

Additionally, as CaptainKaos (a former moderator here in KC) can attest (after lengthy discussion and FORMAL interpretation of the rule[s] in question by St Chris), a listing of availability in a signature line is NOT considered to be an advertisement in violation of the NRP/DNR exception.

Also from that discussion (of which have a copy) . . . Signature lines containing tour dates are acceptable for ladies with NRP/DNR status, mentioning rates or services in a signature line is not allowed. ALSO, contact information (such as a phone number) is allowed and does not violate the rule as it was clarified last year by St. Chris himself via PM. ThreADs too are allowed for ANY member regardless of NRP/DNR status - and linking to an external Website is perfectly okay . . . Having a presence anywhere else on the Internet or a lady advertising on Backpage does NOT negate her policy here on ECCIE. It hasn't since the site began . . .

I clarified every word and aspect of the rule prior to joining this site with both Becky and T-bone. They both said THE RULE IS VERY SPECIFIC and the totality of the policy is contained within rule #29.

- Jackie Devlin

OK, Jackie. I will confirm with St. C and T-Bone.

[Guest121212]

Confirm away - all you needed to do was read the STATED RULE. How can you moderate a Website when you haven't read the rules? Seriously - honest question - as I have to believe, if you had read them, you would have known rule #29 and you would not have been offered poor advice from others (who also obviously have not read the stated rules - which is a bit frightening). It is plainly there, I have not embellished it. This seems to be a RECURRING issue every single time we get new mods (for some reason especially in KC).

Also, the OP was BAIT (if you haven't figured that out by now) by a disgruntled member (who is a moderator on a separate, competing board) WHOM WILL NEVER MAKE MOD HERE, although he chases it like a dog chases cars on a lonely country road.

There are NUMEROUS THREADS AND DISCUSSIONS that may be found here on ECCIE supporting every word of my posting. If the owners have changed the policy, they haven't changed the rule formally nor communicated such to those that have elected the policy.

By the way, if you could please be so kind, I edited my post after you quoted me, could you please update the quote if you are forwarding my post (for accuracy)? Thanks in advance.

[Guest030824]

I always ask the provider after the session if she wants me to write a review. Only one time did the provider and I decide to not write a review. The provider was great and she did her best BUT we did not click. It was no ones fault it just was. I noticed five or six clocks on the wall as I was getting a BJ and started laughing so hard that nothing would help.

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by Jackie Devlin

By the way, if you could please be so kind, I edited my post after you quoted me, could you please update the quote if you are forwarding my post (for accuracy)? Thanks in advance.

Um, NO!

[Guest121212]

Originally Posted by fritz3552

Um, NO!

That was expected . . . they chose a real winner with you, huh?? I bet you last as long as BBD. So much for polite (or impartial) moderation.

I forwarded a link to the entire thread myself to St. C - that way he'll be sure to read the post in its entirety.

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by Jackie Devlin

That was expected . . . they chose a real winner with you, huh?? I bet you last as long as BBD. So much for polite (or impartial) moderation.

I forwarded a link to the entire thread myself to St. C - that way he'll be sure to read the post in its entirety.

Actually, I just couldn't find the text that changed from between the time I quoted you and the time you revised the text, as it was so detalied, long-winded and confusing. I just went ahead and used cut and paste from your updated text.

BTW - if you are correct and I am wrong, I will admit it after I get my response back. I am fine with you forwarding this thread to St. C. If he says that I am incorrect in my interpretation, by all means, accept my apologies. I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV and I didn't stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, so if I don't remember all the rules or know where they all are, then I ask questions and rely on the responses. And I am very polite and understanding as many of those with whom I have corresponded since being promoted to this position can attest. You just need to be polite as well,

[Guest121212]

Originally Posted by fritz3552

Actually, I just couldn't find the text that changed from between the time I quoted you and the time you revised the text, as it was so detalied, long-winded and confusing. I just went ahead and used cut and paste from your updated text.

BTW - if you are correct and I am wrong, I will admit it after I get my response back. I am fine with you forwarding this thread to St. C. If he says that I am incorrect in my interpretation, by all means, accept my apologies. I am not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV and I didn't stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, so if I don't remember all the rules or know where they all are, then I ask questions and rely on the responses. And I am very polite and understanding as many of those with whom I have corresponded with since being promoted to this position can attest. You just need to be polite as well,

The only thing confusing was your fallacious statement re: no review policies.

And, I fail to see how my asking you with a "please" and thanking you in advance was anything other than polite. I believe you may have assumed much connotation from my post that wasn't there . . . In both this thread and a few others.

[BigDeal]

DING! There went my popcorn...be right back!