Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
263 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70687 | biomed1 | 62390 | Yssup Rider | 60220 | gman44 | 53217 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48392 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41270 | CryptKicker | 37179 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35684 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
03-24-2022, 10:53 AM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
What is your definition of "woman"?
Emerged from the womb with a vagina, who was not afflicted with Rokitansky syndrome.
Quote:
Rokitansky syndrome: It is a congenital malformation which occurs during pregnancy, and results in the birth of girls who do not develop, or incipiently develop the tubes of the uterus, neck and vagina. The ovaries, on the other hand, are present and functional.
|
I saw a video the other day of a WOMAN telling another spectator of the "infamous swim meet" in which a MAN beat the WOMEN in the swimming race ...
... who asked her if she is a "biologist"! She answered:
No, and I'm not a vet either, but I know what a dog is. (NOT A QUOTE!*)
*I just wanted to inform the petty, immature brain-dead loudmouths on here that it was not my intention to portray what I posted as a "direct quote"! That will hopefully avoid 100's of stupid pictures and "headlines" subsequently.
Now, should a United States Supreme Court Justice be able to define "woman"?
We already have one who can't count and also can't tell the truth. Do we need another one who doesn't know what a vagina is and also can't tell the truth?
Note: Wiki Quote:
Quote:
In 1996, Jackson married surgeon Patrick Graves Jackson, whose family is considered Boston Brahmins. Through her marriage, she is related to former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.[99] Patrick Jackson is descended from Jonathan Jackson, a delegate to the Continental Congress, and is related to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.[100][unreliable source?] The couple have two daughters.[101] Jackson is a non-denominational Protestant.[102]
|
Academic/rhetorical question: How do they know they are "daughters"?
Or did Wiki take a peak?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 11:53 AM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,495
|
Female - XX chromosomes
Male - XY chromosomes
Note: with these definitions Bruce/Katelyn Jenner is still a boy. That also means that Chaz Bono is still a girl. She doesn't look like a girl anymore though.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 11:59 AM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
Female - XX chromosomes
Male - XY chromosomes
Note: with these definitions Bruce/Katelyn Jenner is still a boy. That also means that Chaz Bono is still a girl. She doesn't look like a girl anymore though.
|
I bet “Katelyn” can still beat “her” meat.
Bono went from being a fat ugly girl to looking like a fat ugly guy.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 12:43 PM
|
#4
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
Female - XX chromosomes
Male - XY chromosomes
Note: with these definitions Bruce/Katelyn Jenner is still a boy. That also means that Chaz Bono is still a girl. She doesn't look like a girl anymore though.
|
It's called Gender Identity Disorder. Someone who is born as one gender but aspires to live their lives as the opposite gender they were born as has Gender Identity Disorder. It's a psychlogical anomaly pure and simple. These people can't help it and there is no need to applaud them.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 12:46 PM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
the question is a valid legal question
as various protections and fundings are made based upon the definition
for example there are at least 8 laws protecting women in the workplace
it is strange that a supreme court nominee cant provide even a layman's definition of woman
well cant isnt the right word, wont is likely the word
why wont she? well several reasons, including potentially angering others of her same world view
or looking the fool before americans in the glaring light of her nomination process should she be true to the leftists
another reason might be found in how she will decide cases that might come before her, cases brought by "women" not fitting the biological definition of woman
her answer was a pitiful, "i'm not a biologist", which made her look the fool, but not quite the same fool if she had stated the definition or non-definition the left clings to
well that deferring makes no sense on several fronts, but suffice it to say that if it requires a biologist to answer, the answer would then seemingly be based on biology
but dont dig into that any deeper, for then her logic will fail completely
just add this to a long list of other anti-scientific positions of the left and their redefining words to fit their desires and the conundrums it foists upon society
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 12:53 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
...
just add this to a long list of other anti-scientific positions of the left and their redefining words to fit their desires
|
which includes that last duffus installed on THE COURT who announced in the recent, well-publicized appellate hearing before THE COURT that 100,000 children had died from Covid ...
... is that also "their redefining words to fit their desires"?
Or was Sotomayer smooth-ass LYING? Like the latest installation is.
Both of those unintellectual, affirmative action appointees need extracting!
Skin color and gender is NOT in the least bit satisfactory for job selection to a life-appointed, life-changing, final-decision government job!
At least this POS we can toss to the curb in four years, if not sooner!
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 01:01 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
The Retards who implemented affirmative action voting in 2020 are responsible.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 01:10 PM
|
#8
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
the question is a valid legal question
as various protections and fundings are made based upon the definition
for example there are at least 8 laws protecting women in the workplace
it is strange that a supreme court nominee cant provide even a layman's definition of woman
well cant isnt the right word, wont is likely the word
why wont she? well several reasons, including potentially angering others of her same world view
or looking the fool before americans in the glaring light of her nomination process should she be true to the leftists
another reason might be found in how she will decide cases that might come before her, cases brought by "women" not fitting the biological definition of woman
her answer was a pitiful, "i'm not a biologist", which made her look the fool, but not quite the same fool if she had stated the definition or non-definition the left clings to
well that deferring makes no sense on several fronts, but suffice it to say that if it requires a biologist to answer, the answer would then seemingly be based on biology
but dont dig into that any deeper, for then her logic will fail completely
just add this to a long list of other anti-scientific positions of the left and their redefining words to fit their desires and the conundrums it foists upon society
|
She can give an accurate definition of what a women is. Any adult is capable of that, it doesn't require a Biology degree. The reason she made that off the wall statement is because of the Transgender community and some of these other clowns who make up alternative gender definitions that defy biological and psychological factors of gender, example "Gender Fluidity". This is how society is destroyed by pandering to this kind of bullshit.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 01:51 PM
|
#9
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17
It's called Gender Identity Disorder. Someone who is born as one gender but aspires to live their lives as the opposite gender they were born as has Gender Identity Disorder. It's a psychlogical anomaly pure and simple. These people can't help it and there is no need to applaud them.
|
...nor condemn them
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 01:55 PM
|
#10
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
What is your definition of "woman"?
|
From your wish washy emotional posts....I'd define your inner self as a little bitch. No matter your chromosomal content.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 3 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 02:02 PM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
At least this POS we can toss to the curb in four years, if not sooner!
![](https://i.imgflip.com/5d775g.png)
|
LL, didn't you post that Kamala Harris was fuckable three years ago? ![Yes](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/yes.gif) You don't like her now that she is Vice President?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 02:15 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
LL, didn't you post that Kamala Harris was fuckable three years ago? ![Yes](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/yes.gif) You don't like her now that she is Vice President?
|
I've known probably more "fuckable" ladies than you, but I don't recall any who were VPOTUS material. There's a difference, but I can understand why folks who voted for Bitten & Kackles don't know the qualities and characteristics required to be POTUS & VPOTUS. It shows daily in this country and is on full blast right now.
You've probably forgotten her "approval rating" (if that's what one would call it) when she dropped out of the running for POTUS. The Dumbocrats didn't even want her! But she qualified for the Skin-Gender Test!
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 02:20 PM
|
#13
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
...nor condemn them
|
I condemn anyone who pretends to be something they are not, ok Mr. Righteous.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 4 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 07:36 PM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,169
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17
It's called Gender Identity Disorder. Someone who is born as one gender but aspires to live their lives as the opposite gender they were born as has Gender Identity Disorder. It's a psychlogical anomaly pure and simple. These people can't help it and there is no need to applaud them.
|
no wonder mtg is so ugly
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-24-2022, 07:43 PM
|
#15
|
AKA ULTRA MAGA Gurl
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,684
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matchingtroll
|
.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|