Multiple threads on same subject

[dearhunter]

When did it become taboo to have "multiple threads on same subject"?

Does that mean we can lock all of the "where is the best place to stay" threADs?

Do we send cease and desist orders to all of the "which is better, bush or bare?" enquiries?

Is Fancy not allowed to grieve when another chihuahua kicks the bucket?

She does have 4 more to go...........inquiring minds want to know.

[oilfieldscum]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

When did it become taboo to have "multiple threads on same subject"?

Does that mean we can lock all of the "where is the best place to stay" threADs?

Does that mean we can lock all of the "NBA WTF ???" threADs?

Do we send cease and desist orders to all of the "which is better, bush or bare?" enquiries?

Is Fancy not allowed to grieve when another chihuahua kicks the bucket?

She does have 4 more to go...........inquiring minds want to know.

Would you like some cheese with all that wine?

Couldn't this been handled with a PM to your favorite mod?......inquiring minds want to know.

[Wakeup]

I didn't understand that reasoning either...and I see the "closed at the request of the OP" disease is back too...

[TexasGator]

I don't think you're gonna get their trigger happy attention without 3-4 more threads on the subject. Ijs

[Pistolero]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

I didn't understand that reasoning either...and I see the "closed at the request of the OP" disease is back too...

I am sorry, wu. You and DH are correct. It was late and I did not use a good reason. I should have said the thread had been off topic since post #10 and it looked like it was headed into continued name-calling and such. Usually, the threads are allowed to continue and the members will straighten it out and at least mention the topic in 43 posts. So, again, sorry for giving a bum reason.

#22 -
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

Since you were so obviously distraught, I felt compelled to honor your request to close the thread.

[dearhunter]

Just so we are clear........we do get to grieve the next dead dog.......right?

[Fancyinheels]

Feel free to visit me in person and express your "sympathetic thoughts," those of you sitting behind the keyboard blithely typing away without a care in the world. I'll give you REAL grief.

I did not start the last thread about my chihuahua, nor will I in the future. One of my clients was talking out of turn to Dallas, who meant well. The only response I made was to thank people. Mock me as you will, but I'm not playing this game further.

Gosh knows my wee wagging woofs are arguably more intelligent and DEFINITELY have better personalities than certain members of this board.

Inquiring minds want to know how you people find TIME to type all this trash? Get a life, or a dog, or a woman, or all 3.

[Wakeup]

Um...I didn't request that thread be closed...

Care to try again?

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Um...I didn't request that thread be closed...

Care to try again?

He was talking about the thread Dallas started genius.

[DEAR_JOHN]

To the moderators of Houston eccie. Please don't do your jobs and take a chance on upsetting the two most useless members of this board. After all, you wouldn't want to upset a couple of members with around 26,000 postings and no credible reviews.

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

He was talking about the thread Dallas started genius.

And this whole thread has nothing to do with the thread Dallas started...it was my thread that got locked with the "multiple threads are bad" comment...

Genius...

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

After all, you wouldn't want to upset a couple of members with around 26,000 postings and no credible reviews.

Or the guy with 2,000 posts and no credible reviews...

Genius...

[Guest050715-1]

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

And this whole thread has nothing to do with the thread Dallas started...genius...

You're being myopic and egocentric. Err'body in the room knows what Pisterelo was talking about the original thread. We can follow a chain of events:

· We can tell that you got butt fucking hurt because Pisterelo closed Dallas' original thread that you were what, having so much fun on?
· You tried to get the original thread opened back up. And when you failed you started your own thread.
· I’m speculating here, but I guess you didn’t feel you were getting enough attention and / or your thread wasn’t going as planned so you started yet another thread.
· Pisterelo closed both of them and dh started this one.

You look stupid with your stupid semantics. Again, you're the only one in the room that thinks you're winning / fooling anyone. Inside the wire like I said.

[Jusanotherdude]

Fun fact.

Dearhunter can Not be banned by the moderators in Houston, Dallas, Arkansas, or anywhere..... but he can issue points to said moderators if he so wished....... interesting, isn't it?

[Wakeup]

Oh my god...is she serious?

Both threads were open at the same time honey...I never tried to get them to open hers up because it was still open...I started the second thread to parrot Fancy's thread, and I requested it be closed...

DH started this thread because Pistolero's reason for closing mine was that "multiple threads weren't needed"...and DH is asking when that became a forum guideline violation...

Your so wrong it's almost astounding...get caught up, because we're not going to explain it to you again...