Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
|
do you actually read the links you post or do you google for anything that is negative for Trump and Republicans? do you just search for "AOC is kool" and post it anyway without even comprehending what it says?
let me help ya out here grasshamster
your link from the Hill ....
Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) slammed Amazon's announcement that it's building a headquarters in New York City, but touted the fact that it will not receive any financial incentives from the local or state government.
“Won’t you look at that: Amazon is coming to NYC anyway - *without* requiring the public to finance shady deals, helipad handouts for
Jeff Bezos, & corporate giveaways,” she tweeted
“Maybe the Trump admin should focus more on cutting public assistance to billionaires instead of poor families.”
Won’t you look at that: Amazon is coming to NYC anyway - *without* requiring the public to finance shady deals, helipad handouts for Jeff Bezos, & corporate giveaways.
Maybe the Trump admin should focus more on cutting public assistance to billionaires instead of poor families. https://t.co/BbqhXbB9MM
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 6, 2019
The comments come after
The Wall Street Journal reported that the tech giant has agreed to take new office space in Manhattan, a reversal from February
when it announced it would not open a second headquarters in New York City.
Amazon said it had signed a new lease for a 335,000 square-foot space on Manhattan’s West Side, where it will take on more than 1,500 employees; yet in a silver lining for progressives, the move will not be accompanied by any special tax credits or other financial incentives.
Ocasio-Cortez was one of the leading opponents to Amazon’s move to the city, arguing that the city would shell out billions in incentives to attract the company and that the move would raise real estate prices beyond the means of local residents, forcing many to move.
The New York progressive claimed victory Friday, citing criticism she got for pushing against the move, which Amazon supporters said would attract thousands of jobs.
Me waiting on the haters to apologize after we were proven right on Amazon and saved the public billions https://t.co/AC64pG0nZI pic.twitter.com/xzCepkX4AV
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 6, 2019
Amazon cited pressure from lawmakers and activists in their announcement earlier this year that they were scrapping their plans to move to the city.
"While polls show that 70 percent of New Yorkers support our plans and investment, a number of state and local politicians have made it clear that they oppose our presence and will not work with us to build the type of relationships that are required to go forward with the project we and many others envisioned in Long Island City," the company said in a statement.
this is NOT the big Amazon deal that dumb-ass cunt nuked. ara ya with me so far? this deal is only 1,500 jobs. it's not big enough for tax breaks .. do you and that cunt get that???
THIS is the deal that fucktard nuked because she's too fucking stupid to understand that the tax breaks only last a few years yet the revenue stream into the NYC economy lasts for decades.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/n...n-hq2-nyc.html
Why the Amazon Deal Collapsed: A Tech Giant Stumbles in N.Y.’s Raucous Political Arena
"On Thursday,
Amazon abruptly announced that it was canceling the deal,
under which the company had promised to create more than 25,000 jobs on a new campus in Long Island City, Queens, in return for nearly $3 billion in government incentives."
so you and that cunt crow that Amazon is bringing a lousy 1,500 jobs without breaks .. when in fact breaks aren't warranted for such a small deal ... when for only 3 billion in short term breaks NYC could have gotten 25,000 high paying jobs worth up to 90 BILLION of 3 decades??
GOTDAM BOI U IS STUPID
BAHHHHAHAHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
and while you are acting all smartypants why don't you help out ecky9.5k in this link and explain why this post doesn't show what he thinks it does .. i'll wait ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
The world will never know as long as lenders, agribusiness and insurers know there is a safety net that keeps them from finding out when they "can't make it in the competitive market place".
https://www.investopedia.com/article...al-bailout.asp
It seems that way to a prejudicial point of view. Check out Wyoming, Vermont, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Montana, Idaho, Hawaii and Alaska. Don't forget the disabled and elderly. You can call me a bleeding heart. I'll call you a heartless miser.
Poverty Rate by Race/Ethnicity
https://www.kff.org/other/state-indi...2:%22asc%22%7D
Poor little, little crying fuckin' hypocrite. |
let me give ya both a hint ....
Relative Standard Error
The standard error is an absolute gauge between the sample survey and the total population. The relative standard error shows if the standard error is large relative to the results; large relative standard errors suggest the results are not
significant. The formula for relative standard error is:
Relative Standard Error=Standard ErrorEstimate×100where:Standar d Error=standard deviation of the mean sampleEstimate=mean of the sample\begin{aligned} &\text{Relative Standard Error} = \frac { \text{Standard Error} }{ \text{Estimate} } \times 100 \\ &\textbf{where:} \\ &\text{Standard Error} = \text{standard deviation of the mean sample} \\ &\text{Estimate} = \text{mean of the sample} \\ \end{aligned}Relative Standard Error=Estimate
Standard Error×100where:Standard Error=standard deviation of the mean sampleEstimate=mean of the sample
can ya figure it out?
N/A: Estimates with relative standard errors greater than 30% are not provided.
another hint ... has to do with demographics and statistical sample sets ...
Wyoming, Vermont, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Montana, Idaho, Hawaii and Alaska.
i'll let you two braininess bois ponder this while the two games finish up. if you haven't figured it out by then i'll be happy to show why that list DOES NOT show what ecky9.5k thinks it does ...
BAHHHAHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Amazon and AOC
