Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
There is a huge difference between old Soviet era missile launchers and new modern US anti-aircraft missile launchers.
|
Yeah, except the ones that are referenced in my link aren't old Soviet era.....they went into service in 2004, are effective up to 11,000 feet and have the technology to defeat most modern anti-aircraft counter measures.
The point is:
1. The support Whirly'tard provides for the assertion is suspect. DiGenova is a partisan hack lawyer and inveterate publicity seeker. He provides no evidence at all that what he is saying has any basis in fact. No reputable news agency is reporting this story.
2. The article itself doesn't say that the mystery missiles were taken from the US embassy or any American facility. It just says "American" anti-aircraft missiles were taken "from Libya."
3. Even if it turns out the story is true, Libya has been awash with modern anti-aircraft missiles for years. Again, see my original link. The idea that there is a sudden, new danger posed by these missiles, that is linked to Bhengazi is nonsense.
The reality? More made-up bullshit to go along with the rest of the made-up bullshit about Benghazi. Benghazi is an industry now, a reliable knee-jerker that riles up the Obama-hating dumbasses. We'll hear about it endlessly from now until 2016 because the only way the Republicans can win the election is to make up fake scandals that they hope diverts attention away from their nonexistent policies and clown-like candidates.
400 SAMS LOOTED FROM BENGHAZI....
