Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60935
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48649
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42577
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid37006
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2021, 01:27 PM   #1
VitaMan
Premium Access
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,344
Encounters: 70
Default go for it Donald

Here is a better explanation of the lawsuit than just a link.



Former President Donald Trump sued Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google and their chief executives.

During his presidency, Trump used Twitter for everything from insulting rivals to major policy announcements, and he relied on Facebook especially to raise money from small-dollar donors.
VitaMan is online now   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 01:32 PM   #2
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,644
Encounters: 22
Default

Easy to see you only included about a third of the story!

Especially the part of suppression of speech
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 01:46 PM   #3
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

This might be fun. Should a privately owned newspaper (yeah,old school) be required to publish every letter to the editor?
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 02:02 PM   #4
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,644
Encounters: 22
Default

What kinda question is that? No point can be made!
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 02:23 PM   #5
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 7,892
Encounters: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951 View Post
This might be fun. Should a privately owned newspaper (yeah,old school) be required to publish every letter to the editor?
That’s kinda crazy, obviously a newspaper has only so much space. It’s apples to oranges too, since Facebook and Twitter present themselves as neutral platforms, not publishers, which gives them certain legal protections.

The quashing of the Hunter laptop story was them finally admitting their blatant bias IMO. Everything about it was legitimate and they censored it anyways.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 02:40 PM   #6
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

Not sure it's crazy, since a lot of law (and I'm not a lawyer) is based on precedent and new platforms are sometimes not a good fit. We all know that certain newspapers and other media have certain "leanings". Hence the "equal time" ruling by the FCC. I'll admit to being a "shit-stirrer", so expand this argument out...should Fox then be required to give equal time to Kamala Harris?

Freedom of the press is a double edged sword. I think the original intent was freedom from a government press and licensure for contradictory views....if you have a press.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 02:55 PM   #7
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

President Trump, your rent free room is ready!
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 03:04 PM   #8
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

He has a good choice of rentals as far as numbers go, although some of the vacancies have been over used and are rather shabby for lack of repair.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 03:49 PM   #9
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,047
Encounters: 41
Default

Fox best be careful. They will not be able to exclude advertisements they don’t like, which they have done a couple of times because it was “agitating” to their watchers for an ad to talk about trump lying or seeing capital police beaten.
1blackman1 is online now   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:02 PM   #10
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Fox best be careful. They will not be able to exclude advertisements they don’t like, which they have done a couple of times because it was “agitating” to their watchers for an ad to talk about trump lying or seeing capital police beaten.

is that your expert legal opinion? FOX can accept or decline any advertiser they want. so can CNN or MSNBC.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:24 PM   #11
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

1b1- What should Fox news 'be careful of" - DPST fascist government shut down? - as Your party has repeatedly advocated for One america News and fox - yet lets the russia lies and other misbehavior of the LSM go without criticism - because it fits your and DPST narrative????


easy - the left loves to shut down any different opinion from the marxit DPST fascist narrative POV!


or - is that now from the Xinn and LSM - that 'cancel culture' is just as 'Defund the Police" - a creation and advocacy of teh conservatives????
that would be typical of the LSM and fascist DPST party.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:32 PM   #12
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

Just saying, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Be careful what you wish for lest you get goosed.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:50 PM   #13
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 7,892
Encounters: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951 View Post
Not sure it's crazy, since a lot of law (and I'm not a lawyer) is based on precedent and new platforms are sometimes not a good fit. We all know that certain newspapers and other media have certain "leanings". Hence the "equal time" ruling by the FCC. I'll admit to being a "shit-stirrer", so expand this argument out...should Fox then be required to give equal time to Kamala Harris?
I don’t quite get that section 230 stuff either, or how it applies to social media. I guess we’re gonna find out.

I don’t think Fox should be required, but it’d be a good idea if they did.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:53 PM   #14
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951 View Post
Not sure it's crazy, since a lot of law (and I'm not a lawyer) is based on precedent and new platforms are sometimes not a good fit. We all know that certain newspapers and other media have certain "leanings". Hence the "equal time" ruling by the FCC. I'll admit to being a "shit-stirrer", so expand this argument out...should Fox then be required to give equal time to Kamala Harris?

Freedom of the press is a double edged sword. I think the original intent was freedom from a government press and licensure for contradictory views....if you have a press.

Equal time to Kamala harris - what has she even spoken or written since becoming VP - other than as 'Lady Haw Haw"!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2021, 04:57 PM   #15
Strokey_McDingDong
Account Frozen
 
Strokey_McDingDong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 8, 2020
Location: Ding Dong
Posts: 3,593
Default

Good to see people championing censorship, because private business.


Of course, a media business should be allowed to silence whoever they want at any time. They should be able to control what kind of information people get by censoring what they don't want them to see. That sounds like a completely normal thing to do.

I totally agree. More power to them.

O yea and TRUMPF FARTED LOL
Strokey_McDingDong is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved