Georgia Election Fraud - The Story:

[Salty Again]

... G'day Truthers,

... After the 2020 election, a Risk Limiting Audit (RLA)
was completed by the GA Secretary of State Office (SoS).
The result of the audit confirmed the 2020 election results.

However, thanks to the efforts of Joseph Rossi, a number
of ERRORS were revealed in the Fulton County data in the
report posted on the "SoS" website.

Mr. Rossi brought forth the errors in the data - and
after being turned down several times, he was finally
able to get his findings in front of members from
Governour Kemp's office.

... As a result of his work, the GA State Elections Board (SEB)
initiated a good investigation into Fulton County and
their RLA (Risk Limiting Audit) - this investigation
is labeled #SEB2021-181.

Eventually, the SEB surely identified violations and
errors in the recounts of the 2020 election in Fulton County.

... And in me next report - I'll show some o' them!

#### Salty

[1blackman1]

Wackadoodle bullshit.

[Yssup Rider]

I'll be on the edge of me seat.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Wackadoodle bullshit.

... Really?

... Your links - to show that it's "bullshit"...??

#### Salty

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... G'day Truthers,

... After the 2020 election, a Risk Limiting Audit (RLA)
was completed by the GA Secretary of State Office (SoS).
The result of the audit confirmed the 2020 election results.

However, thanks to the efforts of Joseph Rossi, a number
of ERRORS were revealed in the Fulton County data in the
report posted on the "SoS" website.

Mr. Rossi brought forth the errors in the data - and
after being turned down several times, he was finally
able to get his findings in front of members from
Governour Kemp's office.

... As a result of his work, the GA State Elections Board (SEB)
initiated a good investigation into Fulton County and
their RLA (Risk Limiting Audit) - this investigation
is labeled #SEB2021-181.

Eventually, the SEB surely identified violations and
errors in the recounts of the 2020 election in Fulton County.

... And in me next report - I'll show some o' them!

#### Salty

Salty, This is an excellent example of incompetence in a county run by Democrats. It never would have happened where I live. It sounds like this may have resulted in Biden being awarded 1000+ more votes than he actually won. However the mistakes apparently wouldn't have affected the outcome of the election in Georgia, let alone the United States. At the state level, Georgia is run by Republicans, and if there had been fraud, they would have figured it out.

Or at least that's what I'm getting from these links I Googled,

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFi...mpressed_1.pdf

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/tr...on-fraud-spin/

Thanks for highlighting this. It sounds like Fulton County’s controls on vote counting could stand to be improved. A lot.

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Wackadoodle bullshit.

WTF? Six likes for "Wackadoodle bullshit"? You've written some educational and persuasive passages here that I've "liked". This is not one of them.

[Salty Again]

... I mentioned earlier that Mr. Rossi found a number of errors
with the SoS's report of Fulton County. He reached a fellow
from Governour Kemp's office - Gabriel Sterling - who then
looked at Rossi's findings and surely admitted that Fulton Co.
made data entry errors. ... Guv Kemp's office agreed with
Rossi that the RLA report posted on the Sec. of State's
website IS WRONG and has a number of errors.
Brian Kemp's own words were "It's sloppy and inconsistent"...
... Kemp was also quick (maybe a bit too quick) to point out
that the Fulton County errors did not dispute the outcome
of the 2020 election.

In other words, just because Fulton County seemed to make
vote-counting errors and they favoured Joe Biden, it didn't
hurt anything 'cause Biden still won the presidency.

... Some o' those "inconsistencies" were machine scanners
counting duplicates... Scanners re-counting the same ballot
groups and results... For example, a group would show Biden
getting 44 votes and Trump got 8 - and this same group was
counted 2 or 3 times. .. Which surely resulted in Joe Biden
receiving 4081 "extra votes" or "false Absentee ballots".

... So Joe Biden was credited with over four thousand (4,000)
extra votes in Fulton County due to machine error and simply
counting wrongly.

... Which surely begs the question: How many other swing-state
countys also have errors like these??

... A few other facts to pondour: Georgia rushed to Certify
their elections 3 days after the election... Trump has a HUGE
200,000 vote lead election night before the pause - and somehow
Biden made that up and "won" by a little under 12,000 votes.

Fulton County has now admitted to "over-counting" some 4,000
"extra votes" for Biden - and THIS all has NOTHING to do
with me case of "fraudulent ballots" being held and not shown.

... More evidence coming out every day... I'll start looking
at how Raffensperger and his mates have been trying like
Jack-the-Lad to cover things up.

### Salty

[Salty Again]

... Surely appreciate yer comments there, Tiny.
Actually, in THIS case it's over 4,000 "extra" votes
for Biden due to the errors - either in mis-counting
by the machine equipment or somebody adding figures wrongly.
OR BOTH.

... And as I mentioned - THIS has nothing to do with
Fulton County's "show the so-called Fraudulent ballots" dispute.
That one has to do with 145,000 ballots.

... Some o' me research for this came from a good article
from the Gateway Pundit... They actually show Kemps's letters
about this - to the Fulton County elections people and
what-not. ... And he knows this is a DISASTER.

... You also need to remember, mate - that they Certified
their election QUICKLY just days after the election.

And when Trump and others wanted a Judge to pause things
before the 6th Jan Certification - Raffensperger surely
stalled things and didn't want any investigation.
Because they just might find something like THIS.
And a Judge might order a HALT in Georgia.

Which of course Kemp and Raffensperger didn't want THAT.

#### Salty

[Lucas McCain]

Thanks for the fantastic intel, Salty. Your insiders seem to really be on top of things as usual. Just out of morbid curiosity, do your "insiders" also compare Trump to Jesus like you do?

Edit for below: Salty, I indirectly addressed your thread. If I directly addressed it, it pretty much would have been the same as the 2nd post in this thread and I didn't want to waste any additional bandwidth with redundancy so instead, I (apparently along with 5 other people) simply gave him a like on his post for thinking the exact same thing as him.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

Thanks for the fantastic intel, Salty. Your insiders seem to really be on top of things as usual. Just out of morbid curiosity, do your "insiders" also compare Trump to Jesus like you do?

... COMPARE?? ... I surely reckon some o' me "Insider" mates
might think that Trump IS Jesus!

Not that yer comment got anthing to do with the thread topic,
but sometimes it is nice to hear from you, mate.

#### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... COMPARE?? ... I surely reckon some o' me "Insider" mates
might think that Trump IS Jesus!

Not that yer comment got anthing to do with the thread topic,
but sometimes it is nice to hear from you, mate.

#### Salty

Insider what? Insider whackadoodle? Do people even call it that anymore?

Still looking for some underlined blue type in your “evidence,” Salty.

People shoveling the Georgia conspiracy bullstuff are getting smacked pretty hard themselves.

https://ordinary-times.com/2023/11/2...f-finding-out/

No wonder our pals from the MAGAnificent Mile aren’t comfortable citing the source of their panic du jour.
LOLLING

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Surely appreciate yer comments there, Tiny.
Actually, in THIS case it's over 4,000 "extra" votes
for Biden due to the errors - either in mis-counting
by the machine equipment or somebody adding figures wrongly.
OR BOTH.

Salty, I believe I was mistaken. If I'm understanding the FactCheck article, and if they're right, the 3,000 to 4,000 extra votes weren't ever included in the official tally. The initial vote count showed Biden winning by 12,670 votes. A machine recount resulted in a Biden winning by 11,779 votes, and that was the final, certified result. So, if I understand correctly, if the erroneous audit results had been incorporated into the total, Biden would have been shown to have won by around 15,000 votes. I'm not sure though as they're also saying "the overall count in the audit was close to the official machine results."

So I’ll stick with the same conclusion - This is an example of ineptitude in a county run by Democrats.

[farmstud60]

The simple fact of the matter is unless there is actual voter ID laws in place the fraud is harder to detect. Most of the voting law changes based on " covid " did not follow laws and how to change them. Court cases never heard the actual arguments and never ruled on them. The news media declared Biden won when remaining ballots to count and margins of victory so small for automatic recounts that the call wasn't accurate.


Was there fraud in the 2020 presidential election? Absolutely
Was the fraud enough to change the election outcome? Probably
Is there an easy way to prove the fraud? No, simple rules that would provide confidence in the election such as voter ID were not in place.

[1blackman1]

Voter ID. The fix to a non-existent problem.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Salty, I believe I was mistaken. If I'm understanding the FactCheck article, and if they're right, the 3,000 to 4,000 extra votes weren't ever included in the official tally. The initial vote count showed Biden winning by 12,670 votes. A machine recount resulted in a Biden winning by 11,779 votes, and that was the final, certified result. So, if I understand correctly, if the erroneous audit results had been incorporated into the total, Biden would have been shown to have won by around 15,000 votes. I'm not sure though as they're also saying "the overall count in the audit was close to the official machine results."

So I’ll stick with the same conclusion - This is an example of ineptitude in a county run by Democrats.

... Nope, they WERE counted... Which was the problem.
They may've changed the official tally AFTER THE FACT
- but they all saw the problem once they saw Rossi's
figures - and Kemp may have had the SoS office change
the "Official Tally" - if that was ever correct or
even correct now.

... These so-called "Fact checks" are obvious creative shams
to distort the impact of these findings... As the Georgia
Officials surely wouldn't want anybody thinking that
their-own elections are not true and honest.

Raffensperger would prolly tell you there were NO mistakes!

#### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Making excuses for non existent circumstances not being brought to light.

You've entered a new zone here, Salty.

Thanks!