Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70798
biomed163388
Yssup Rider61077
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48710
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42878
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-13-2012, 06:58 AM   #1
mastermind238
Valued Poster
 
mastermind238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 10, 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,000
Encounters: 37
Default Harvard Law Prof Alan Dershowitz, on Zimmerman's arrest

"Most affidavits of probable cause are very thin. This is so thin that it won’t make it past a judge on a second degree murder charge,” Dershowitz said. “There’s simply nothing in there that would justify second degree murder.”

Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law School

See this brief clip of the interview with Prof Dershowitz:
http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2...unethical.html


Everybody hailed the decision by this prosecutor to by-pass the grand jury and sign the charging documents herself as a great victory for justice. I see it as an admission that no grand jury would indict if presented with the evidence she has. And can't most prosecutors convince most grand juries to indict a ham sandwich?

This is the same ELECTED prosecutor who has brought adult first degree murder charges against a 12 year old.

Here's a not-too-flattering article on the prosecutor - not from Fox News, but from the ABAJournal - that's ABA as in American Bar Association.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...n_election_af/

Zimmerman is in jail now for one reason only: racial politics and the need to pander to the race hustlers.
mastermind238 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 09:08 AM   #2
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Dershowitz is an unusual liberal. He actually makes sense on occation. I got a very bad feeling listening to the special prosecutor's remarks to the press when she announced the charges against Zimmerman. Right at the start she referred to talking to Trayvon's "sweet parents" and the "search for justice for Trayvon". If Trayvon was the agressor and Zimmerman was acting completely in self defence then there is no justice required for Trayvon. In that scenario, justice has already been accomplished. By saying that she's seeking "justice for Trayvon" she's telling us the fix is in.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 09:13 AM   #3
TheDaliLama
Valued Poster
 
TheDaliLama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,097
Default

Fair trial and hangin...

2 less votes for BO.

Folks get turned off when they see Sharpton and Jackson on TV.
TheDaliLama is online now   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 09:19 AM   #4
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

He will not get 2nd degree.

He may walk...let the jury decide.

Oh and Fuc Alan D
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 09:44 AM   #5
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

WTF, I am shocked, shocked I tell you. You can't even write Dershowitz when he doesn't support your position. We all agree that as a liberal you are a closet anti-semitic. My estimation of the liberal Dershowitz has gone up in the last few years because it seems that he really cares about the law and it is not a situation belief. Like Joe Lieberman, Dershowitz is an honest liberal. The mere fact that it can be pointed out should demonstrate how rare an honest liberal is.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:02 AM   #6
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
We all agree that as a liberal you are a closet anti-semitic. .
Just because I care for this country more than Israel does not make me antic-semitic.

I suggest you move there if you care for it so much. Just like assholes suggested that TTH move to France if he liked it so much.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:11 AM   #7
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

A Prosecutors job, regardless of all the tripe they expound in public, is to get a conviction.

It is the job of the Defense Attorneys to get a 'not guilty' verdict. Not guilty does not mean innocent.

It's the Jury's job to impart justice.

Dershowitz has already been proven wrong, the Judge did see probable cause to let the 2d degree murder charge stand.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 11:39 AM   #8
Don't Be Daft!
Valued Poster
 
Don't Be Daft!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 20, 2012
Location: DFW, Manchester U.K. , Tel Aviv
Posts: 1,171
Encounters: 15
Default

I quite fancy Alan D. I saw a lecture from him at University College London. He is quite clever I might add.
Don't Be Daft! is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:52 PM   #9
Sexyeccentric1
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 126013
Join Date: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Rocking in my rocking chair on my porch..
Posts: 654
Default

From what I got they didn't want to over charge with first degree murder because that would be much harder to prove. They apparently found enough evidence to bring the 2nd degree murder charge. With 2nd degree murder if convicted he could get life in prison.

I actually liked the special prosecutor and was impressed how she handled the press. She also did a fair amount of butt chewing with some of the press asking the same questions over and over that she had already answered.

She looks to be all business and no bones about it type. She was not going to talk badly about the prior prosecutor or the police department and I think that was the right thing to do.

I think Zimmerman will get a fair trial. I am glad that Al Sharpton and others got involved and brought this case to light because had they not this guy would have gotten away without ever haven been investigated or arrested.
Sexyeccentric1 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 01:42 PM   #10
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liberaldevil View Post
I quite fancy Alan D. I saw a lecture from him at University College London. He is quite clever I might add.
I would love to see Norm Finkelstien debate Alan!



Norman Finkelstein
{{MainMain|Dershowitz-Finkelstein affair} Shortly after the publication of Dershowitz's The Case for Israel (2003), Norman Finkelstein of DePaul University said the book contained plagiarism.[38] He offered several examples, one of which was a quote from Mark Twain appearing on pages 23–24 of The Case for Israel, which he said was the same as one on pages 159–160 of From Time Immemorial by Joan Peters, including with the ellipses in the same place.[39] Dershowitz said the quote was taken from Mark Twain, to whom he gave credit. Harvard's president, Derek Bok, investigated the allegation and determined that no plagiarism had occurred.[40]
In early 2004 it was announced that Dr Finkelstein would publish a study rebutting Professor Alan Dershowitz’s The Case for Israel and documenting that extensive passages in his book had been plagiarized. Dershowitz and his attorneys entered into a protracted correspondence with the publisher, originally New Press and subsequently University of California Press also involving Governor Schwarzenegger. [41] Dershowitz had pressured the publishers suppressing the release of Beyond Chutzpah, yet refused to release his correspondence – indeed, falsely claiming that he had released it. Later in 2007 a California Public Records Act (CPRA) request was made to the University of California Press and the letters were released.[42][43]
In October 2006, Dershowitz wrote to DePaul University faculty members to lobby against Finkelstein's application for tenure. The university's Liberal Arts and Sciences faculty voted to send a letter of complaint to Harvard University.[44] In June 2007, DePaul University denied Finkelstein tenure.[45]
[edit] Mearsheimer and Walt

{{MainMain|The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy} In March 2006, John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, Professor of International Affairs at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, co-wrote a paper entitled "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," published in The London Review of Books.[46] Mearsheimer and Walt criticized what they described as "the Israel lobby" for influencing U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East in a direction away from U.S. interests and toward Israel's interests. They referred to Dershowitz specifically as an "apologist" for the Israel lobby. In an interview in March 2006 for The Harvard Crimson, Dershowitz called the article "one-sided" and its authors "liars" and "bigots."[47] The following day on MSNBC's Scarborough Country, he suggested the paper had been taken from various hate sites: "every paragraph virtually is copied from a neo-Nazi Web site, from a radical Islamic Web site, from David Duke’s Web site."[48] Dershowitz subsequently wrote a report challenging the paper, arguing that it contained "three types of major errors: quotations are wrenched out of context, important facts are misstated or omitted, and embarrassingly weak logic is employed."[49] In a letter in the London Review of Books in May 2006, Mearsheimer and Walt denied that they had used any racist sources for their article, writing that Dershowitz had offered no evidence to support what they said was his false claim.[50]
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 01:52 PM   #11
mastermind238
Valued Poster
 
mastermind238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 10, 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,000
Encounters: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
A Prosecutors job, regardless of all the tripe they expound in public, is to get a conviction.
True, but there is more to it than that. There are rules governing the conduct of ANY prosecutor. Such as that the bills of indictment MUST contain evidence that is favorable to the accused. Dershowitz's point here is that THIS prosecutor failed to do her duty, and in fact has handled this case unethically.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
Dershowitz has already been proven wrong, the Judge did see probable cause to let the 2d degree murder charge stand.
You are WRONG. Zimmerman was arraigned, that's all. Yeah, the arraignment was in front of a judge, but the defense isn't exactly allowed to put on its case there. At an arraignment, it's only the prosecutor asking a judge to sanction the arrest. The preliminary hearing to which Prof Dershowitz referred, is scheduled for May 29. At THAT time a judge, after carefully examining all evidence submitted, and after reading/hearing the arguments from the defense, might very well dismiss. At THAT time, you may declare Prof. Dershowitz an imbecile if the judge allows this case to proceed to trial, but not before.
mastermind238 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 02:16 PM   #12
mastermind238
Valued Poster
 
mastermind238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 10, 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,000
Encounters: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
... Harvard's president, Derek Bok, investigated the allegation and determined that no plagiarism had occurred.[40]
So ... citing a Wiki article that covers various controversies involving Dershowitz somehow proves that Dershowitz is unqualified to state a professional opinion about a prosecutor's conduct? Interesting.

The specific controversy you bring up has to do with Israel and public/foreign policy issues. Nothing whatsoever to do with criminal defense. Nothing whatsoever that would cause an intelligent person to question Prof Dershowitz's opinion of the Zimmerman prosecutor's unethical conduct.

So you think character assassination is sufficient to win your argument? If so, I'm a little confused about what your argument IS. But let me give it a try.

WTF thinks Zimmerman must be guilty because Dershowitz is a scumbag.

There. Did I accurately state your argument? I hope so, because that's the only argument that could be made with the "evidence" you presented from that Wiki article.

You seem to be a fan of Wiki. But could you clarify something in the timeline for me, Kemosabe? Dershowitz's book appeared in 2003, and Finkelstein's charges shortly thereafter. But Larry Summers was president of Harvard from 2001 to 2006. If Derek Bok investigated and declared that there was no plagiarism, he must have done so while we was a private citizen and NOT while president of Harvard. His first tour was 1971 - 1991, and his second tour lasted 2006 - 2007. I think the investigation written about in this Wiki article that you copied so generously from MUST have taken place BEFORE Bok took over as acting president.

Not that it matters. Dershowitz would make mincemeat of Finkelstein in the debate you long for.
mastermind238 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 03:43 PM   #13
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

WTF cares about this country? He's already said he sees the disaster coming, but isn't willing to do anything about it. Then he criticizes Alan Dershowitz? I don't always agree with Dershowitz, but he is a straight shooter, and I respect that. He should be on the Supreme Court.

And there he goes with that junior high cheerleader "fuc". No credibility, he can't even keep his stories straight.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 03:58 PM   #14
mastermind238
Valued Poster
 
mastermind238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 10, 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,000
Encounters: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
[Dershowitz] should be on the Supreme Court
Yikes!! What a thought!

I will give you this: Dershowitz is STRONGLY pro gun control, but at least he has made it clear that repeal of the second amendment is necessary to accomplish what he wants. He does not believe in creative reading of the clear language. The amendment is there, and it says what it says. If you don't like it, you MUST REPEAL IT. So says Alan Dershowitz, and for that I'd at least say he deserved to be considered for SCOTUS.
mastermind238 is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 05:22 PM   #15
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

I am on my phone but I never said what either u or cuteoldliar said I said.lol
WTF is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved