Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
396 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
278 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70793 | biomed1 | 63220 | Yssup Rider | 60906 | gman44 | 53294 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48645 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42560 | CryptKicker | 37215 | The_Waco_Kid | 36977 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
04-02-2015, 03:32 PM
|
#1
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
LOSIN' IN LAUSANNE......
The key negotiating points that Obama is caving on:
- No closing of facilities
- R&D will continue on Iran’s scientific schedule
- Enrichment will continue
- The heavy water at Arak will be modernized
- U.S. has completely caved on the Fordow concession (the Iranian underground bunker. Iranians would be allowed to keep centrifuges spinning inside the mountain.)
Other key point. The Iranians (along with the EU) are saying that sanctions will be terminated “simultaneously” with Iran implementing its obligations. Team Obama is saying something completely different.
Who do you think is the liar in this scenario?
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 04:56 PM
|
#2
|
2016 County by County Map
Join Date: Dec 13, 2009
Location: There now. Not here.
Posts: 4,378
|
All of them!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 05:06 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 30, 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 2,239
|
The first time Iran says "NO" to part of an agreement, such as denying inspections, nothing will be done. That's the problem with the Iranians knowing Obama is spineless, weak, and desperate to avoid confrontation for another year and a half.
|
|
Quote
| 4 users liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 05:55 PM
|
#4
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
PEACE IN OUR TIME! Thanks, Obama.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 06:44 PM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
PEACE IN OUR TIME! Thanks, Obama.
|
Mushroom clouds in our time more like !
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 07:49 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
PEACE IN OUR TIME! Thanks, Obama.
|
About the only difference in what has happenned today, and what happenned in 1937 is about 78 years.
The Mullas are all probably at the local bar as we speak, congratulating each other on putting it to the stupid, naive, US Commander in Chief.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 08:24 PM
|
#7
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
LMFAO x 100,000,000
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 08:42 PM
|
#8
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 284979
Join Date: Feb 22, 2015
Location: Guess
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
LMFAO x 100,000,000
|
Noticed your signature line quote: "No war is over till the enemy says it is over. We may think it is over, we may declare it over.but in fact the enemy gets a vote."
General James Mattis 2006
Guess you are saying you are the enemy?? By the way, I think you need to improve your "punctuation."
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 08:44 PM
|
#9
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeekingTruth
Guess you are saying you are the enemy??
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-02-2015, 11:40 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,906
|
KILL THEM!
Naw... I don't feel any smarter after that.
Carry on, wingnutz!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-03-2015, 06:32 AM
|
#11
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Kennedy stood up to Russia and kept nukes out of Cuba...........
Obama intends for us to acquiesce in, and facilitate the acquisition of, nuclear weapons by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mullahs have been at war with the United States since 1979, have a lot of American blood on their hands, and continue to call for “Death to America.”
Who in his right mind, with the best interests of the United States at heart, thinks that relenting in our opposition to the mullahs’ acquisition of nuclear weapons is a good idea?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-03-2015, 06:37 AM
|
#12
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-03-2015, 06:46 AM
|
#13
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
ABCNews is reporting it's Congress' next move on the deal. There's no deal. From what I can read, nothing is signed. There's a "framework". Congress doesn't approve "unsigned frameworks."
Two months from now will anything be signed or will it be renegotiated?
This wouldn't be happening if Secretary of State Clinton was still in office.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-03-2015, 06:55 AM
|
#14
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
You are correct. Even Iran is disputing yesterday's White House statement on what was agreed to. As is the EU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
ABCNews is reporting it's Congress' next move on the deal. There's no deal. From what I can read, nothing is signed. There's a "framework". Congress doesn't approve "unsigned frameworks."
Two months from now will anything be signed or will it be renegotiated?
This wouldn't be happening if Secretary of State Clinton was still in office.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-03-2015, 06:56 AM
|
#15
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Kennedy stood up to Russia and kept nukes out of Cuba...........
Obama intends for us to acquiesce in, and facilitate the acquisition of, nuclear weapons by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mullahs have been at war with the United States since 1979, have a lot of American blood on their hands, and continue to call for “Death to America.”
Who in his right mind, with the best interests of the United States at heart, thinks that relenting in our opposition to the mullahs’ acquisition of nuclear weapons is a good idea?
|
What is your third option ? All I have heard from the party of NO is no, but no third option. Unless you are really for military intervention.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|