Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
645 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
258 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70654 | biomed1 | 62203 | Yssup Rider | 60189 | gman44 | 53192 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48309 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41212 | CryptKicker | 37165 | Mokoa | 36490 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35624 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
07-15-2024, 09:27 AM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Judge Cannon Dismisses Jack Smith’s Documents Case Against Trump
Federal District Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the case against Former President Trump brought by what appears to be an illegal appointed US Prosecutor, Jack Smith.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/polit...non/index.html
The link speaks for it’s self.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 09:29 AM
|
#2
|
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,116
|
District Judge Aileen Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution
Well I guess we all know how that ruling went now... lol.
Whos opinion isn't worth shit now?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 10:09 AM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper
District Judge Aileen Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution
Well I guess we all know how that ruling went now... lol.
Whos opinion isn't worth shit now?
|
Trump should now bring a lawsuit to recoup all costs, plus more, against Merrick Garland’s vJustice Department for an illegal and malicious prosecution against a private citizen.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 10:15 AM
|
#4
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,563
|
Hmm?mmmm
She was strategically appointed by trumpf.
Her ruling is not based on law.
Good grief.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 3 users liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 10:19 AM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 2,989
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie
Hmm?mmmm
She was strategically appointed by trumpf.
Her ruling is not based on law.
Good grief.
|
LOL, her ruling was based on law, the case wasn't.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 11:08 AM
|
#6
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmstud60
LOL, her ruling was based on law, the case wasn't.
|
Rigged. Biased judge
If another judge ruled against trumpf the tune here would be different hey'
Her ruling was payback for trumpf appointing her
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 11:08 AM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 6, 2014
Location: san antonio
Posts: 649
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie
Hmm?mmmm
She was strategically appointed by trumpf.
Her ruling is not based on law.
Good grief.
|
What law school did you graduate from WD?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 03:25 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,574
|
I’ve been skeptical of the idea that Aileen Cannon was biased for Trump. I didn’t like some of her rulings and I thought that she was stalling the case but I didn’t really think that she would scuttle the case. How naive I was.
Judge Cannon ignored decades of institutional precedent, years of recent rulings on Mueller and Smith, and pretty much the entire premise of the special counsel regulations.
I’m not sure you can get a more biased judgement from the court than this.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-15-2024, 03:36 PM
|
#9
|
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,116
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
I’m not sure you can get a more biased judgement from the court than this.
|
Alvin Bragg would like a word...
LOL... well looks like we have a ruling on the Constitutionality of Smiths appointment. Lets see DOJ defend it now...
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-16-2024, 08:38 AM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 29, 2018
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 562
|
It's time for her to be dismissed
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-16-2024, 08:38 AM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 29, 2018
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 562
|
It's time for her to be dismissed
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-16-2024, 09:15 AM
|
#12
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,563
|
Investigations are needed into this corrupt judges ruling. Total bs
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
07-17-2024, 06:32 AM
|
#13
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,250
|
Eileen Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, has made several controversial decisions while handling the case, all in Trump's favor. I think the case was too big for her and she wanted out.
Her latest ruling breaks precedence. The ruling will be appealed and in the opinion of many in the legal system will be overturned. The ruling in no way indicates Trump is innocent of the charges. It is a mere technicality but the ruling is important because the case now has no chance of coming to trial before the election.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
07-21-2024, 05:05 PM
|
#14
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 14,511
|
When are all dem magas going to yell their approval of Hunny B lawyers using this argument to get his charges dropped.
We're waiting.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
07-22-2024, 06:31 AM
|
#15
|
Chasing a Cowgirl
Join Date: Oct 19, 2013
Location: West Kansas
Posts: 30,863
|
Geeze....
US Constitution:
Article II, Section 2
... He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments....
So yes, Federal prosecutors must be confirmed by the senate.
The only remaining question is why didn't one of the Florida Federal prosecutors, that has been confirmed by the senate, file the charges and show up in court?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|