Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Uh, my guess is the cop is to blame.
|
Think about that for a minute.
A cop pulls a person over for a traffic stop. The person does not own the car, tells the cop he doesn't have the paperwork, or something to that affect.
The cop does what all cops do, runs a check for warrants or wants. The guy suddenly takes off.
The cop now has to make a decision. Just let him go, or pursue. After all, most people who have done nothing wrong just decide to take off during a traffic stop.
A scuffle results, the cop does not know what he was dealing with. The taser failed. The man is still trying to get away.
The cop then makes a fatal decision. He shoots.
This all started when Walter Scott decided to run.
On Orielly tonight, Hiraldo Rivera made a good case that the State will make a big mistake if they charge the cop with murder, rather than manslaughter. The case might not meet the requirements of murder.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/geraldo-d...d-with-murder/
Of course, it makes no difference to the cop. His life is over. His wife and kids, who he supported, (contrary to Mr Scott), will live in poverty.
All because Walter Scott, by his fleeing, put an Officer in a terrible position where he made a horrible decision.
So, I go back to my initial question. Why did Walter Scott run, and who is responsible for putting men into a position where they fear contact with the police to that degree to compell them to run from any encounter.
And in doing so, escalates the situation to the extent that results in the needless death of a man.