Seems to an upsurge in attacks in London since the Right Honorable

[Cherie]

Sadiq Khan came into office. JMHO

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...l-people-mown/


What is the matter with the left, they kiss "the crazies" azz and "the crazies" shove their meathooks right back up the lefts azz.

The meaning of loony is doing the same thing over and over and getting the same results. Oh that's right, that's why their called Loony Liberals.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

His mere presence is fostering an atmosphere of hate. That is the left wing Trump theory.

[Jackie S]

When is the civilized world going to wake up?

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

When is the civilized world going to wake up?

When the Muslims take over and chop off the liberals heads.

[bamscram]

The PM isn't from the left.

[Jackie S]

Sadie Khan is the Mayor of London.

[bamscram]

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3179066.html

[The_Waco_Kid]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bamscram

The PM isn't from the left.

Well hopefully she reaches out to Trump, it certainly would be beneficial to both parties. First, my opinion is, England is in need of a "no bar holds " kind of government, like in "grow a set" PM Mays, ("I dare say "find a way to expedite the terminus of Sadiq Khan"). Who better to train from than our President Trump. Second, it would be a great visual for the rest of the world to see another alliance take place. Strength in numbers, we certainly (IMHO) have an alliance of sorts with many Arab countries.

When the Liberals see our President being looked up to despite all their BS and outright lies maybe then, they will back off on their propaganda and allow him get down to the business of running Washington DC.

WISHFUL THINKING??????????THINKING POSITIVE

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Strength in numbers, we certainly (IMHO) have an alliance of sorts with many Arab countries.

You talking about Saudi Arabia, the country where most of the 9/11 hijackers were from?

Question, were you in favor of the Iraq invasion of 2003? The one that cost us so much in both lives and money?

[The_Waco_Kid]

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by WTF

You talking about Saudi Arabia, the country where most of the 9/11 hijackers were from?

Question, were you in favor of the Iraq invasion of 2003? The one that cost us so much in both lives and money?

Of course she was. She is a Bush worshiper!

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by bamscram

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3179066.html

The links of mayoral hopeful Sadiq Khan’s former brother-in-law to one of the UK’s most notorious extremist organisations are revealed today.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by WTF

You talking about Saudi Arabia, the country where most of the 9/11 hijackers were from?

Question, were you in favor of the Iraq invasion of 2003? The one that cost us so much in both lives and money?

I don't believe I was a yay or nay at that time as it was more toward the beginning of my interest in the world around me, specifically world politics.

In hindsight however 2003 was certainly not the genesis of the world conflict with the Arab countries, the conflicts arose in Biblical times and just has continued and become more modern in nature i.e. weapons of mass destruction, chemical agents, soft targets etc.

http://voice-wilderness.com/biblical...east-conflict/

I digress back to modern hostilities between Arab countries and the Western world (do we need to take some blame for issues happening in the world around us, of course, we are all, after all humans and we do/did/have made many a faux pas along the way, in that we are a very greedy species and saw BLACK GOLD AKA OIL). In the twentieth century British/American (and when looked at further the Arab countries have been at conflict with the world since the beginning of the Quran) issues came into play with Arab countries:

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...vasion_of_iraq

Once again I digress but looking back at the 3/19/03 war , the Congress including Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer all voted to go to war based upon the Intelligence that they were given. Bush did not choose war in a vacuum.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I don't believe I was a yay or nay at that time as it was more toward the beginning of my interest in the world around me, specifically world politics.

In hindsight however 2003 was certainly not the genesis of the world conflict with the Arab countries, ...

Once again I digress but looking back at the 3/19/03 war , the Congress including Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer all voted to go to war based upon the Intelligence that they were given. Bush did not choose war in a vacuum.

Don't take the bait. That's all it is: bait. No substance.